Brian Ross Criminal Defence Lawyer

07/21/2026

Can the Crown forfeit seized assets after criminal charges are stayed? The Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in R. v. Nguyen explains when forfeiture remains possible and the strict legal limits the Crown must follow. Read the full article and contact our criminal defence team for trusted legal guidance - https://shorturl.at/cY2pV

06/18/2026

Limits of After-The-Fact Conduct in Homicide Cases

The Ontario Court of Appeal reaffirmed that evidence such as fleeing, failing to help, or making false statements must only support specific and rational inferences. Speak with our experienced lawyers today for strategic criminal defence representation - https://shorturl.at/8Vp2A

06/12/2026

Guide to Cannabis Car Searches and Legal Rights

The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in R. v. McGowan-Morris clarifies when Charter rights apply during roadside cannabis searches and what drivers should know. Read more to understand your legal protections - https://shorturl.at/K7VGe

Police searching your car for cannabis must follow strict Charter rules and legal standards. Learn when searches are lawful and understand your rights clearly.

06/04/2026

Limits of Browne v Dunn Tenor in Cross Exam

Examine the Ontario Court of Appeal’s analysis in R. v. McDonald, including the flexibility of Browne v. Dunn, the importance of fairness, and the risks of overly restrictive jury instructions. Read more to better understand this significant criminal law decision - https://shorturl.at/HAYKk

05/01/2026

Shielding Accused from Prejudicial Criminal Records

See how R. v. Hussein, 2026 SCC 2 reshapes Corbett applications, limits prejudicial criminal records, and adds social context protections for accused persons. The ruling rejects outdated credibility assumptions tied to violent offences and youth records while strengthening fair trial rights. Explore these important legal changes today now - https://shorturl.at/PBEKu

04/03/2026

What is the Air of Reality Test in Criminal Law?

What does “air of reality” mean for included offences in criminal trials? The SCC in R. v. Pan clarifies when juries must consider lesser offences and limits a judge’s role in weighing evidence. Understand how this ruling strengthens defence strategies and jury fairness—explore the implications and discover how it can impact your cases - https://shorturl.at/Ebt4Y

The “air of reality” test determines when a jury can consider included offences in a criminal trial. Learn how courts apply this standard & limit judicial discretion.

02/06/2026

Arrests in Ontario: Your Rights & Legal Remedies

Ontario law places limits on searches incidental to arrest to prevent abuse of authority. This guide explains what is allowed, what is not, and the legal consequences of overreach. Understand your protections and discover your remedies by reading further - https://shorturl.at/6Xal7

01/15/2026

Detention in Ontario: Grounds, Rights, and Excluding Evidence

This article explains psychological detention, police limits during street encounters, and when Charter protections apply. It also outlines powerful remedies available when rights are breached. Stay informed and speak with a criminal defence lawyer to protect your interests - https://shorturl.at/tHPFB

Police detentions require objective, reasonable suspicion and activate your right to counsel. Explore how Ontario law defines detention and protects your rights.

10/13/2025

Can Your Actions After an Offence Be Used in Court?

Can post-offence behaviour prove intent or guilt? Courts rely on strict safeguards before drawing such conclusions. Judges must exclude all other possibilities first. Read how this legal principle helps ensure justice and prevents wrongful findings of guilt. Learn the reasoning behind this rule in evidence law - https://tinyurl.com/bdfkcxuj

What you do after an offence can be used as evidence in court, shaping the strength of your case. Discover how post-offence actions may influence legal outcomes.

08/28/2025

Admissibility & Necessity of Expert Testimony

When is expert testimony truly required in criminal trials? Judges apply strict rules to prevent unnecessary influence. See how necessity is assessed, why helpfulness alone isn’t enough, and what recent court decisions reveal about admissibility. If you need clarity about your case, connect with a skilled criminal defence lawyer today - https://shorturl.at/AVBkc