19/10/2026
âď¸ Case Study Part 3: Why the Dismissal Didn't Stand.
A serious allegation doesn't automatically justify dismissal. Without sufficient evidence, even a seemingly straightforward misconduct case can fall apart.
In the final part of our PRASA v CCMA and Others case study, we unpack why the Labour Court dismissed PRASA's review application and upheld the CCMA's finding of substantive unfairness.
The problem? Gaps in evidence, unanswered questions and inconsistent disciplinary treatment.
đ The lesson for employers?
Before dismissing an employee, make sure you can:
âď¸ Establish what actually happened.
âď¸ Identify who was responsible.
âď¸ Support allegations with credible evidence.
âď¸ Consult relevant witnesses.
âď¸ Demonstrate consistency in disciplinary decisions.
At PeopleSync, we help businesses navigate disciplinary processes with confidence, ensuring decisions are supported by evidence and fair procedures.
đĄ Remember: Suspicion isn't proof, and certainty isn't evidence.
đ Follow us for more real Labour Court cases and practical workplace lessons.
đ www.peoplesync.co.za