09/10/2026
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made it easier than ever to find information about almost any legal question. With a few sentences, you can ask AI about a contract, a dispute, your legal rights or whether you may have a claim and within seconds, you have an answer that sounds remarkably convincing.
But there is one important distinction to remember: Legal information is not the same as legal advice.
AI can be a useful starting point. It can explain legal terminology, provide general information and help you identify questions or issues that may need further investigation. The problem starts when an AI-generated answer is treated as though it were advice from a qualified legal practitioner.
Our law is complex and very fact-specific. The answer to a legal question may depend on the precise wording of a contract, the applicable legislation and regulations, court rules, common-law principles and relevant case law not to mention the particular facts and circumstances of YOUR matter.
AI can also get things wrong. It may misunderstand the facts you provide, overlook an important exception, rely on outdated legislation or case law or confidently refer to a case or legal principle that simply does not exist.
Contracts are a good example. You might ask AI whether a contract is enforceable, whether a particular clause is valid or whether you have the right to cancel an agreement. The answer may sound reasonable, but the outcome could depend on the exact wording of the agreement, how and why it was concluded, what has happened since and the legal principles that apply.
That is where context and experience matter. AI can help you find information. An attorney must determine how the law applies to your specific circumstances.
So, by all means, ask Advocate ChatGPT. Use AI to learn, to understand and to help you formulate questions to ask your attorney.
But perhaps what you really need isn’t another ChatGPT chat, it’s someone who knows what to do with the answer.
Reach out and let us chat instead: [email protected]