04/09/2026
A recent Western Cape High Court judgment has provided important guidance on the role of alternative accommodation in eviction proceedings.
The case involved 161 people unlawfully occupying Transnet-owned properties in Woodstock and Salt River, where evidence linked the properties to serious criminal activity in the surrounding area. The Court found that the absence of alternative accommodation did not, on its own, prevent an eviction from being just and equitable.
Importantly, this does not mean property owners can simply evict unlawful occupiers where no alternative accommodation is available. Eviction applications remain highly fact-specific, and courts must consider factors including the circumstances of the occupiers, their conduct, the nature and duration of the occupation, meaningful engagement and available municipal resources.
💡 The judgment reinforces an important principle: alternative accommodation is a significant consideration in an eviction, but it is not an automatic barrier to an eviction order.