20/07/2026
Employers of fund members are mandated by the Pension Fund Act, 1956 (”PFA”) to deduct member contributions from employees’ salaries and pay them to the fund. Failure to do so can lead to criminal and personal liability for employers. This article looks at the consequences of non-compliance and the personal liability imposed on directors for failing to comply with S13A of the PFA.
Our pension fund practice helps employers, human resource professionals and compliance officers to understand their legal duties towards contributions and compliance, turning complex legal obligations into practical, risk‑reducing actions.
PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR NON COMPLAINCE WITH S13A OF THE PENSION FUND ACT.
In the matter of Engineer Industries Pension Fund, Metal Industries Provident Fund and Installair (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation), Paolo Rinalda Orso, Sandra Martha Orso (1633/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 8 the court had to decide whether to hold the directors of a company personally liable in terms of S13A(8) and S13A(9) of the Pension Fund Act (“PFA”). There is a prevalent trend of employers failing to pay their contributions and members' contributions to funds as required by the PFA. This non payment is detrimental to members as it has a negative effect on their benefits.
BACKGROUND
Installair (Pty) Ltd (“employer”) was in the process of liquidation. Paolo Rinalda Orso (“second respondent”) and Sandra Martha Orso (“third respondent”) were the directors of the company. The employer had failed to submit contribution schedules containing the member data, which a fund relies on to reconcile payments of contributions, to the Engineering Industries Fund and the Metal Industries Provident Fund (“the Applicants”) The Applicants approached the court in terms of S13A(1), S13A(7), S13A(8), S13A(9) and Regulation 33 to hold the directors of the employer, the second and third respondents, personally liable for outstanding contributions.
The employees/members received salaries that reflected that their contributions towards their pension and provident were deducted. The deductions were made but not paid to the Applicants and the members did not receive their benefits. The first and second respondents argued that the personal liability of the directors only arose after having regard to the circumstances that led to the breach of the employer and directors’ duties and the extent to which the directors were responsible for those circumstances. The respondents also argued that because the third respondent was not involved in the employer's business, she should not be personally liable for the outstanding contributions.
APPLICABLE LAW - S13A PFA
Section 13A of the PFA regulates the processes and timeframes regarding payment of contributions and other benefits.
S13A(1) imposes a statutory obligation on an employer of any member of a fund to pay contributions to the fund that are deducted from a member's salary and to pay contributions that are due by the employer.
S13(2) provides that schedules of the contributions must accompany the contributions when submitted to the fund. If not, the employer has 15 days within which to submit same.
S13A(7) provides that interest will be levied on contributions that are paid after the 7th of the month as set out in S13A(3)(a)(i)
S13A(8) provides for personally liability of compliance with S13A on the following persons:
• S13A(8)(a ) personal liability on the directors of a company,
• S13A(8)(b) personal liability on the members who control a close corporation,
• S13A(8)(c) personal liability on person or people “who controls or is regularly involved in the management of the employers' overall financial affairs.
The Financial Services Laws General Amendment Act, 2013 reintroduced criminal sanctions for non compliance with S13A of the PFA by adding S13A (8), (9), and (10) to allow for liability to those who are in control or regularly involved in the management of the employer’s financial affairs.
The Applicants approached the court because they wanted the schedules for the outstanding months to calculate the contributions that were due to them by the employer and to calculate the interest that was due. The court held that S13A (8) (a) imposed personal liability for the employers’ debts “without the need to pierce the corporate veil.” And found that the respondents were liable.
CONCLUSION
This judgment is significant because it reinforces the principle that employers must adhere to their responsibilities regarding contributions as prescribed by S13A. The judgment holds the employer accountable regardless of the company's financial status, allowing the members to peruse legal action against the employer in their personal capacity. It helps to safeguard the members' benefits and affords them recourse and a chance of receiving what is due to them. Employees of the employer, who are responsible for the financial management of the company, will be encouraged to prioritise compliance with the Act, promote responsibility in handling members contributions and reduce the rampant non compliance with S13A. The judgment is a constructive development for members.