S.R.MIR

S.R.MIR Lawyer | Columnist | President (Kashmir University)| J&K Apni Student Union| Member of KWA Page is created to help students

24/11/2025

Justice Surya Kant takes oat as 53rd Chief Justice Of India

UPSC has announced multiplelegal vacancies!If you're aiming to work with CBI, SFIO,Ministry of Finance, Corporate Affair...
22/11/2025

UPSC has announced multiple
legal vacancies!
If you're aiming to work with CBI, SFIO,
Ministry of Finance, Corporate Affairs and
more--this is your chance.
check eligibility from below mentioned site.
🌐 Official Website: www.upsc.gov.in

🧑‍⚖️Justice Pankaj Mithal’s remark — “Reservation should be given only to the first generation, not after that” — has re...
18/11/2025

🧑‍⚖️Justice Pankaj Mithal’s remark — “Reservation should be given only to the first generation, not after that” — has reignited a powerful conversation about how India defines equality, upliftment, and long-term social justice. ⚖️ His statement points to a genuine concern: reservation was designed as a support system to help those historically pushed to the margins, not as a permanent advantage passed down endlessly. Once a family attains educational and economic stability, continuing the same benefits for future generations may reduce opportunities for those who are still struggling at the bottom. This perspective argues that reservation should act as a stepping stone — empowering one generation so the next can progress without dependence, creating space for merit, confidence, and self-reliance.
However, the counterargument emphasizes that India’s deep-rooted social inequalities do not vanish in a single generation. Even if families rise economically, caste-based discrimination and systemic barriers often continue in subtle but real forms. Removing reservation too early could undo the progress achieved, as true equality requires consistent support across generations, not just one moment of upliftment.
Justice Mithal’s comment therefore raises a crucial question: should reservation be generationally restricted, or should it be linked to actual, measurable disadvantage? The balanced approach may lie in reform — ensuring that reservation continues for those who genuinely need it, while gradually phasing it out where upliftment is visibly complete. What remains undeniable is that the discussion sparked by his statement is necessary, timely, and vital for shaping a fairer India.

All great changes are preceded by chaos .Ruhullah Mehdi
27/10/2025

All great changes are preceded by chaos .

Ruhullah Mehdi

Senior JKAS Officer Sent to Jail for Defying Court Orders in South KashmirSrinagar, October 09 :- Jammu and Kashmir Poli...
10/10/2025

Senior JKAS Officer Sent to Jail for Defying Court Orders in South Kashmir

Srinagar, October 09 :- Jammu and Kashmir Police have taken physical custody of a senior JKAS officer, who is holding the charge of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Verinag Development Authority, following directives from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anantnag. Acting on the order passed by the Court of Sub-Judge Anantnag, Feroz Ahmad Khan, a copy of which is in the possession of news agency Kashmir Dot Com (KDC), police have taken custody of senior JKAS officer M. Rouf Rehman, who is holding the charge of CEO, Verinag Development Authority.

The Sub-Judge, while hearing Ex*****on Petition No. 147/EP (Case No. 133/2023) titled Hamidullah Bawani vs Union Territory of J&K and Others, ordered the Superintendent of District Jail, Anantnag, and the SHO Anantnag to take the officer, identified as M. Rouf Rehman, son of Haji Abdur Rehman Ganaie, into judicial custody till October 15, 2025, which is the next date of hearing in the case. The court directed the police to produce the officer before it via video conferencing on the next date of hearing.

Sources told Kashmir Dot Com that the police subsequently took custody of the officer and escorted him to a local hospital for a medical examination before lodging him as per procedure.

Earlier, on September 9, the court, while expressing displeasure over non-compliance, noted that the CEO, listed as Judgment Debtor No. 4, had “not even bothered to reply to the show cause notice issued by virtue of order dated 04.03.2025.” The order further stated, “Despite service of order dated 04.03.2025, no cause has been furnished by Judgment Debtor No. 4, which implies that he has no cause to show as to why he shall not be arrested and detained in a civil prison.”

The decree holder, Hamidullah Bawani, a resident of Mir Maidan, Doru, through Advocate Fayaz Ahmad Sodagar, had sought ex*****on of the award dated March 14, 2015, passed in the National Lok Adalat, and enforcement of a subsequent order dated November 17, 2018.

During proceedings last month, counsel for the Deputy Commissioner and Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag, appearing as Judgment Debtors No. 2 and 3, submitted that “it is Judgment Debtor No. 4 who has to deposit/make the payment as per the decree passed by this court.” Taking note of the submissions, the court held that “it is Judgment Debtor No. 4 who has to deposit/make the payment to the decree holder as provided under the judgment and decree.”

Finding continued non-compliance, the court in September ordered attachment of the Treasury account (Head No. SN.72) operated by the Verinag Development Authority with the Treasury, Dooru, directing that “the Treasury Officer, Dooru, shall not entertain any bill of Judgment Debtor No. 4 in respect of the above-said account head.”

In addition, the court had issued a bailable warrant of arrest to the tune of ₹50,000 against the CEO, directing the Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station Verinag, to execute the same “for its ex*****on and early return.”

20/05/2025
07/04/2025

FIR Registration Under BNSS vs. CrPC

The Supreme Court, in Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat (2025), recently highlighted a crucial change in India's criminal procedure law.

Under the old CrPC, if information disclosed a cognizable offence, the police were mandatorily required to register an FIR-no questions asked, no preliminary inquiry allowed (Lalita Kumari v. U.P.).

But under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), Section 173(3) introduces a significant exception:

If the offence is punishable with 3 to less than 7 years, police can, with permission from a senior officer, conduct a preliminary inquiry to assess whether a prima facie case exists before registering an FIR.

This shift aims to curb frivolous cases, prevent misuse of criminal law, and protect individual rights-especially in sensitive matters involving speech and expression.

The judgment serves as a reminder of how procedural safeguards can evolve to balance law enforcement with civil liberties.

29/08/2024

SRINAGAR: Distinguished Kashmir expert, author, political commentator and lawyer Abdul Ghafoor Majeed Noorani, popularly known as AG Noorani has passed away at his Mumbai residence. He was 94. [caption id=

19/04/2024

Ram vs Rahim, the main aim of rioter is to adopt the governance of foreign Invader, 'sever the unity' ... Vote For The Best

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when S.R.MIR posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Law Practice?

Share