07/24/2020
Guardianship and Conservatorships
PARENS PATRIAE POWERS
In a guardianship or a conservatorship proceeding, the state, through the court system, exercises powers known as parens patria, literally “country as father.” Traditionally when someone with an estate was a chronological adult, but lacked the maturity to manage his/her own affairs, the courts could be asked to intervene and appoint an adult to continue to function as the parent and manage the estate on his/her behalf. The Court appointee was the “guardian” or the “conservator,” and the person whose estate was under such management was the “ward (now referred to an incapacitated person).”
The current statute in Massachusetts provides for guardianship/conservatorship when the incapacitated person’s ability to manage his/her personal and financial affairs is substantially compromised by mental illness, by developmental disabilities, or by physical incapacity. Physical incapacity may include conditions ranging from coma to the after-effects of a stroke. When the incapacitated person’s incapacity only involves his/her ability to manage their financial affairs, a conservator is appointed to manage the estate. The estate includes income, assets, and debts. When the incapacitated person’s incapacity involves the ability to manage his/her personal affairs, such as medical treatment, then a guardian is appointed to make those decisions. There is also a procedure that can be used when the parent(s) or a child under the age of eighteen (18) are unfit to care for the child, so that the court can appoint a suitable adult as the guardian.
The court-appointed guardian or conservator is charged with managing the incapacitated person’s personal and/or financial affairs on behalf of the incapacitated person, and making decisions that are in the his/her best interest. They are accountable to the court for the discharge of their duties.
The Court utilizes several different mechanisms to ensure that the guardian or conservator is fulfilling his/her obligations faithfully. Those mechanisms include bonds, guardianship plans, and accounts. In addition, mechanisms exist to discharge a guardian when one is no longer needed, or to remove a guardian for neglect or abuse of his/her duties. Finally, there are inherent limitations on the powers of the guardian or conservator.
MODERN LIMITATIONS TO GUARDIANSHIP
Parents are often required to make decisions that their children do not like, such as getting a vaccination from the pediatrician. Similarly, guardians and conservators often have to make decisions that their incapacitated person’s dislike, such as limiting their spending money or applying to a state agency for specialized services. While the incapacitated person expressed preference should be taken into consideration when the guardian or conservator is making a decision, that preference is not determinative of what is in the incapacitated person’s best interest. Indeed, it is the incapacitated person’s very inability to determine his or her own best interest that prompts the Court to appoint a guardian or conservator in the first place.
Extraordinary Medical Treatment
A guardian does not have the right to make decisions about what the courts consider to be “extraordinary medical treatment.” The courts have delineated a few areas that qualify as extraordinary medical treatment:
Life prolonging treatment: Guardians have the authority, even the obligation, to consent to life-saving treatment. They lack the authority to consent to (or to decline) life-prolonging treatment, such as keeping a patient on a respirator. Of course, many times there is no decision to be made, because there is a unanimous medical consensus about the utility or the futility of such treatment. However, when there is no medical consensus, when the incapacitated person is able to express an opinion that is contrary to that consensus, or when involved family members are not in agreement with that consensus, the Court needs to be asked to make the decision. An emergency petition can be filed in the Probate and Family Court seeking a determination of the incapacitated person “substituted judgment.”
Sterilization or abortion: Because these decisions have irreversible consequences bearing on the incapacitated person’s right to procreate, a guardian cannot consent to either abortion or to sterilization. Instead, a petition must be brought seeking a determination of the incapacitated person’s “substituted judgment.”
Anti-psychotic medication: In a physical emergency, doctors at a hospital have the authority to involuntarily administer anti-psychotic medication to prevent harm. In a psychiatric emergency, doctors at a hospital have the authority to initiate ongoing treatment with anti-psychotic medication on an involuntary basis “on the way to court.” Any ongoing involuntary treatment with anti-psychotic medication can only be done with court approval. Psychiatric facilities may procure such authorization for the length of an involuntary commitment as part of the civil commitment process in District Court. Otherwise, that authority can only be granted by the Probate and Family Court with the adjudication of a “Rogers” petition.
Case law and certain regulations require that the treating physician have voluntary, informed consent for medical treatment. Where the patient has a court-appointed guardian, it is unlikely that the incapacitated person’s consent to treatment with anti-psychotic medication is truly voluntary and informed. As a practical matter, most physicians and facilities do not worry about informed consent for short-term treatment, such as a brief psychiatric hospitalization. But any long-term treatment with anti-psychotic medication should lead to a Rogers petition.
Procedures: The procedures for securing court authority for extraordinary treatment include the appointment of an attorney to represent the incapacitated person and the requirement of an evidentiary hearing in any case where the attorney does not agree that it is the substituted judgment of the ward to accept the proposed treatment. Hence, it is crucial for the guardian to be represented by a lawyer in any such proceeding in order to ensure that the judge hears both sides of the evidence and makes a decision that is in the best interest of the incapacitated person.
Other Civil Liberties Issues
A guardian cannot consent to voluntary or involuntary psychiatric hospitalization of his/her incapacitated person. The incapacitated person may be involuntarily hospitalized under the same procedures applicable to any other adult: pursuant to a “pink paper,” signed by a designated physician, for an initial three-day period, or by order of the District Court for a similar period. Alternatively, the guardian can seek specific permission from the Probate and Family Court for a particular involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. In any event, the standard is the same: whether failure to hospitalize the ward would likely result in physical harm, to the ward or to others, because of mental illness. The Probate and Family Court procedure is similar to that of the civil commitment statute. A court-appointed attorney will represent the ward at an evidentiary hearing.
Occasionally, a guardianship is limited by the Court in order to permit the ward to exercise civil rights that she/he would otherwise be denied. This should be standard procedure, as long as the ward has the capacity to make those decisions. Indeed, unless a guardianship is limited, the ward lacks the ability to enter into marriage or to vote in an election.
TYPES OF GUARDIANSHIP
PERMANENT GUARDIANSHIP/CONSERVATORSHIP
The permanent guardian/conservator of a incapacitated person is charged with managing the personal and financial affairs of the incapacitated person, subject to any limitations imposed by the Court. For a discussion of limitations, see below. Personal affairs include the choice of the residence and consent to medical treatment or social services. Financial affairs include the incapacitated persons assets, debts, income and expenditures.
The permanent guardian is charged with managing only the personal, non-financial, affairs of the incapacitated person. This is typical when the incapacitated person has no significant assets or income to manage, or when his/her only income is from a state or federal agency who has appointed a representative payee for those funds.
The permanent conservator is charged with managing the incapacitated person’s financial estate: his/her assets, liabilities, income and expenditures.
A guardian is appointed after the filing of a petition; the issuance and service of a citation from the Court; and a hearing before a Judge to determine that the incapacitated person is incompetent to manage his/her own affairs and that the proposed guardian is suitable.
The term “permanent” means that a guardian shall continue to serve until the death of the guardian, until the death of the incapacitated person, or until further order of the Court. The Court may remove a guardian for failure to fulfill his/her duties, may discharge a guardian if the incapacitated person becomes competent to manage his/her own affairs, or may approve the resignation of guardian.
TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP/CONSERVATORSHIP
The entire process for appointing a permanent guardian or conservator can take anywhere from six weeks to 9 months, depending upon the length of the docket of the local court and the need for a full-fledged trial in the event of a contested case. Very often, the incapacitated person has needs that are more immediate, and his/her welfare may suffer without interim assistance from a temporary guardian or conservator. Examples of this need include providing needed medical treatment, enabling hospital discharge to a new living situation (such as a nursing home), or paying overdue bills.
In such cases, the petitioner may file a motion for temporary guardianship or conservatorship. After a hearing regarding the immediate need, the Judge may appoint a temporary guardian or a temporary conservator. Such an appointment is limited in two ways. First, it expires after ninety (90) days, absent a motion to extend. Second, the authority of the temporary guardian or conservator is limited to dealing with the emergency.
LIMITED GUARDIANSHIP
Even a permanent guardianship decree may be limited by the Court, if the Judge finds that the incapacitated person’s incompetence extends to some, but not all, areas of his/her life. For example, a paranoid person may be incapable of trusting a doctor enough to consent to medical treatment, but be perfectly capable of deciding where he/she will live, or of voting for President. In such a case, limiting the guardianship to medical treatment decisions may be appropriate. If a guardianship decree contains any such limitation, the guardian should be careful not to overstep the bounds of his/her authority by trying to manage matters that the Court intended to leave to the discretion of the ward.