What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 5:30pm Tuesday 8am - 5:30pm Wednesday 8am - 5:30pm Thursday 8am - 5:30pm Friday 8:30am - 1pm

The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC

Home
United States
Virginia Beach, VA
The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC

Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC, Lawyer & Law Firm, 397 Little Neck Road , Bldg. 3300 S. , Ste. 206, Virginia Beach, VA.

Established in Virginia Beach, our firm delivers rigorous legal representation across multiple practice areas including Family Law, Criminal Defense, and Civil Litigation.

08/31/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the asylum applicant omitted from his first application that he killed three people in El Salvador, his second application wasn’t much more transparent and only fully confessed to the murders and gang membership when he testified before an immigration judge, the Board of Immigration Appeals did not err when it found that he lacked cred...

Where the asylum applicant omitted from his first application that he killed three people in El Salvador, his second application wasn’t much more transparent and only fully confessed to the murders and gang membership when he testified before an immigration judge, the Board of Immigration Appeals ...

08/24/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where two defendants challenged their convictions related to a spree of armed robberies, but the evidence establishing one defendant’s guilt was “crushing” and a “mountain of evidence” established the other defendant’s guilt, their convictions were affirmed.

Where two defendants challenged their convictions related to a spree of armed robberies, but the evidence establishing one defendant’s guilt was “crushing” and a “mountain of evidence” established the other defendant’s guilt, their convictions were affirmed.

08/17/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the defendant argued that the Second Amendment renders 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4), which imposes a lifetime ban on those who have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution from purchasing or possessing a fi***rm, facially unconstitutional, this challenge failed.

Where the defendant argued that the Second Amendment renders 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4), which imposes a lifetime ban on those who have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution from purchasing or possessing a fi***rm, facially unconstitutional, this challenge failed.

08/10/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the district court did not err when it instructed the jury on the relevant elements of S*x Offender Registration and Notification Act, the defendant’s conviction was affirmed.

Where the district court did not err when it instructed the jury on the relevant elements of S*x Offender Registration and Notification Act, the defendant’s conviction was affirmed.

08/03/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the defendant argued that the district court did not adequately explain why it denied his motion for compassionate release, but the record showed otherwise, the district court’s order was affirmed.

Where the defendant argued that the district court did not adequately explain why it denied his motion for compassionate release, but the record showed otherwise, the district court’s order was affirmed.

07/27/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the plaintiff argued a law enforcement officer searched his Facebook and Gmail accounts in retaliation for his community advocacy, but he failed to plead facts making it plausible the officer did not have probable cause to search the accounts, the suit was dismissed.

Where the plaintiff argued a law enforcement officer searched his Facebook and Gmail accounts in retaliation for his community advocacy, but he failed to plead facts making it plausible the officer did not have probable cause to search the accounts, the suit was dismissed.

07/20/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the record supported a man’s convictions for abduction, abduction with intent to defile and possession of child po*******hy, they were affirmed.

Where the record supported a man’s convictions for abduction, abduction with intent to defile and possession of child po*******hy, they were affirmed.

07/13/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the circuit court rules on a defendant’s timely motion for a sentence modification under Code § 19.2-303, but, by the time this court rules on the appeal, more than 60 days have passed since the defendant’s transfer to the Department of Corrections, the appeal is moot.

Where the circuit court rules on a defendant’s timely motion for a sentence modification under Code § 19.2-303, but, by the time this court rules on the appeal, more than 60 days have passed since the defendant’s transfer to the Department of Corrections, the appeal is moot.

07/06/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where a fi***rm was located within arm’s reach of the defendant when he was sitting in the driver’s seat, and he was the driver and purported owner of the vehicle, there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for possessing a fi***rm as a convicted felon.

Where a fi***rm was located within arm’s reach of the defendant when he was sitting in the driver’s seat, and he was the driver and purported owner of the vehicle, there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for possessing a fi***rm as a convicted felon.

06/29/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where a man charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) argued the statute violated the Second Amendment, this challenge failed. The statute is consistent with three different founding-era regulatory traditions: (1) restrictions on the interstate transportation of fi***rms and mu*****ns; (2) disarming persons under felony indictment and (3) b...

Where a man charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) argued the statute violated the Second Amendment, this challenge failed. The statute is consistent with three different founding-era regulatory traditions: (1) restrictions on the interstate transportation of fi***rms and mu*****ns; (2) disarmin...

Address

397 Little Neck Road , Bldg. 3300 S. , Ste. 206
Virginia Beach, VA
23452

Opening Hours

Monday	8am - 5:30pm
Tuesday	8am - 5:30pm
Wednesday	8am - 5:30pm
Thursday	8am - 5:30pm
Friday	8:30am - 1pm

Telephone

+17574569070

Website

http://www.wbparkhurstlaw.com/, https://linktr.ee/wbplaw

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC:

Want your business to be the top-listed Law Practice in Virginia Beach?