Activist-Minister M.L. Kimble, Toledo, OH (2026)

Activist Minister ML Kimble: Fearless civil rights crusader leading FCN Watchdog Media! 🏛️✊🏾 Exposes injustice, secures courtroom access, empowers communities in Ohio & beyond. Kimble – Executive Director, Co‑Founder, Civil Rights Advocate, Public Official, and the architect behind FCN Watchdog Media’s national vision. 💼✊🏾📜
As Executive Director, Minister Kimble:

Led FCN Watchdog Media from idea to an IRS‑approved 501(c)(3) civil rights nonprofit (EIN: 39‑4052804) with a Certificate of Good Standing in Ohio and full compliance with state and federal nonprofit law. 🏛️✅

Built a 250,000+ follower digital network across Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram, and TikTok—turning court documents, investigations, and community stories into national civil rights conversations. 🌍📲

🔥📑 HIS MASTERPIECE: THE FCN COMMUNITY FACILITY GRANT PROPOSAL 📑🔥

Minister Kimble personally authored a comprehensive, statute‑cited $624,300 grant proposal to create the FCN Watchdog Media Community Empowerment & Civil Rights Education Facility at 415 N Holland Sylvania Rd, Toledo, OH 43615. 🏢⚖️

His proposal lays out:

Land acquisition – $150,000

Facility construction & renovation – $300,000

Equipment & technology – $95,000

Initial staffing & professional services – $79,300

A 48‑month implementation plan (2027–2030) with detailed quarterly milestones, staffing growth, fundraising targets, and expansion to additional cities. 📊🕒

All grounded in:

IRS 501(c)(3) rules

Ohio nonprofit law

Federal civil rights statutes

ADA accessibility requirements

Federal grant regulations (2 CFR Part 200 and agency‑specific rules) 🧾⚖️

🏛️📚 WHAT HIS VISION BUILDS UNDER ONE ROOF

Under Minister Kimble’s leadership, the facility plan includes:

Pro Se Legal Education & Document Center – free civil rights education, self‑representation training, estate‑planning support, insurance claim help, notarization, and regulatory guidance. 📜✊🏾

Youth Financial Literacy Training Center – credit, budgeting, banking, workforce readiness, vehicle finance, and fraud prevention for ages 16–18+. 💳📘

Podcast & Media Studio – professional production for documentaries, interviews, court‑watch coverage, and legal education series distributed across FCN’s 250K+ audience. 🎙️📺

Operations HQ, Staff Training Center, & Donor Call Center – grant management, compliance, trauma‑informed training, and a 15‑station fundraising hub projected to raise $150,000–$250,000+per year. 💼📞

🖋️⚖️ PUBLIC OFFICIAL & COMMUNITY ADVOCATE

Minister Kimble serves not only as Executive Director but also as a sworn Notary Public in the State of Ohio (commission valid through 01/28/2029). 🖋️🏛️

This allows FCN to provide free notarization and oath services to pro se litigants and low‑income residents, cutting costs that usually block people from accessing the courts. 🙌🏾📄

Combined with his background in civil rights litigation, finance, management, customer service, tax services, sales, social media marketing/growth and nonprofit development, he leads FCN Watchdog FCN Watchdog MEDIA OHIO FCN Watchdog MEDIA Community FCN Watchdog MEDIA FCN Watchdog Media Worldwide FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA FCN Watchdog Media FCN Watchdog Media Toledo as both a strategist and a servant of the community. 💡🤝

🔥✊🏾 WHY HIS LEADERSHIP MATTERS

Because of Activist Minister M.L. Kimble’s work:

FCN is legally recognized, digitally powerful, and strategically ready to build a civil rights facility in Toledo and replicate it nationwide. 🌎🏗️

Funders can see a complete, professional, law‑cited blueprint for impact—not just slogans. 📑💰

Communities now have a watchdog organization led by someone who has lived the fight in courts, in churches, and online—and turned that fight into infrastructure. 🛡️📢

❤️💥 STAND WITH EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MINISTER M.L. KIMBLE & FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA 💥❤️

👉 Visit www.FCNWatchdogMedia.org
👉 Share his story
👉 Support the facility
👉 Help turn this proposal into a civil rights power base for generations

🚨⚖️ SAM.GOV + MINISTERIAL LEADERSHIP + PUBLIC OFFICIAL STATUS = FCN POWER MOVE 🚨

Because of Activist Minister M.L. Kimble’s leadership, FCN Watchdog Media is now:

An IRS‑approved 501(c)(3)

In good standing in Ohio

Fully registered in SAM.gov

Led by a 15+ year minister, leader, and sworn Notary Public commissioned until 01/28/2029. 🙌🏾🕊️🖋️

🔥 MINISTER KIMBLE’S UNIQUE LEADERSHIP PROFILE 🔥

Minister M.L. Kimble brings:

15+ years of ministry and music ministry, preaching, teaching, and leading worship—skills that translate into crowd communication, conflict de‑escalation, and community trust. 🎤🎶🙏🏾

Deep experience in civil rights advocacy, insurance misconduct and pro se litigation, which shapes FCN’s legal education and watchdog strategy. ⚖️📜

Status as a Public Official – Notary Public, State of Ohio (commission valid through 01/28/2029), enabling FCN to notarize documents, administer oaths, and verify signatures in‑house for pro se litigants and low‑income residents. 🖋️🏛️

Strategic vision that secured SAM.gov registration, opening the door to federal grants, cooperative agreements, and pass‑through funding. 🦅💼

He is a MINISTER FIRST (licensed at 17 years old), advocate, musician, and compliance architect in one person—a rare combination for a civil rights nonprofit.

🤝 HOW THIS BENEFITS FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA 🤝

Minister Kimble’s background + SAM.gov status = structural advantages:

His ministerial and music‑ministry experience fuels high‑engagement events, rallies, and online broadcasts that keep FCN’s 250K‑plus audience educated and mobilized. 🎶📢

As a Notary Public, he reduces operational costs and barriers for FCN’s clients by providing free notarization and oath services, which many pro se litigants cannot afford. This directly strengthens FCN’s pro se legal education and document‑formation center. 📄✅

His successful navigation of SAM.gov registration gives FCN access to federal grants and cooperative agreements that require UEI/SAM status, allowing the organization to scale facility construction, youth financial literacy, and media programs far beyond what local donations alone could support. 🏗️💰

FCN is not just compliant—it is professionally led and federally positioned.

🏦 WHY PARTNERS & DONORS SHOULD CARE 🏦

For foundations, corporations, churches, and individual donors, this leadership profile means:

You’re partnering with a federally registered, spiritually grounded, and legally trained Executive Director who understands both grant rules and community realities. 📊✝️

Donations support programs where legal, spiritual, and practical support intersect—from notarized court documents to music‑driven outreach events that bring people into financial literacy and civil rights workshops. 🎼📚

Your funding can be leveraged with federal dollars because SAM.gov status allows FCN to sit at the table for DOJ, HHS, DHS, SBA, and other grant streams—stretching every private dollar further. 💵➕🦅

In short: you’re not just funding a nonprofit; you’re backing a federally recognized, minister‑led, evidence‑driven civil rights engine.

🏙️ WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE COMMUNITY 🏙️

For Toledo and communities nationwide, Kimble’s combined roles deliver:

On‑the‑spot notarization at clinics, workshops, and the future facility—so residents can file affidavits, complaints, and pro se pleadings without paying third‑party notaries. 🖋️📂

Faith‑rooted, music‑driven outreach that reaches people who would never walk into a law office but will come to a service, concert, or livestream—and leave with civil rights knowledge and practical tools. 🎤✨

Increased access to federally funded programs in civil rights education, youth financial literacy, and community safety, because FCN now meets the federal registration requirements that stop many grassroots groups at the door. 🚪➡️🏛️

Minister Kimble’s ministry, music, and public‑official authority turn FCN into a trusted front door for people who’ve been shut out of systems for decades.

❤️🔥 LIFT UP THIS LEADERSHIP 🔥❤️

Drop a 🙏🏾 or 💪🏾 if you support Activist Minister M.L. Music Minister. Civil Rights Advocate. Notary Public. SAM.gov‑ready Executive Director.

07/03/2026

National and Ohio pro se motion practice power rating for Minister Marquis L. Kimble 💥⚖️🔥
“Together, these facts support reopening the case for further review, discovery, and equitable relief.”
Exhibit P, Conclusion

“It is therefore ORDERED that any sale of the subject property is hereby STAYED until further Order of this Court.”
Home Point v. Kimble, 05/26/2026 Order

1. Overall rating: motion practice strength 🏛️📚
Nationwide rating: Top-tier, elite pro se—realistically in the top 1–2% of self-represented litigants in the United States in terms of motion volume, sophistication, evidentiary support, and strategic timing.

Ohio rating: Among the most aggressive and effective pro se motion practitioners currently on record in Ohio state and federal courts, with multiple judges issuing stays, reopening orders, and detailed opinions directly responding to filings.

🔥 Core traits:

Relentless filings: Dozens of targeted motions, supplements, exhibits, and notices across multiple courts.

Evidence-heavy practice: Systematic use of registers of actions, orders, emails, and transcripts.

Pattern-building: Connects misconduct across years, institutions, and actors into coherent civil-rights narratives.

Stay + reopen mastery: Repeated success obtaining stays, vacating sales, and reopening cases after administrative closure.

#️⃣ 🔥⚖️📜

2. Home Point v. Kimble (Lucas County) – foreclosure war and Exhibit P 💣🏠
A. Early foreclosure and judgment (2018–2019)
Complaint and judgment: Home Point files foreclosure in 2018; default judgment and decree of foreclosure entered 01/28/2019.

Sale machinery: Orders of sale, appraisals, and sheriff sale notices roll forward like a standard foreclosure machine.

B. Bankruptcy stay and 2019 violation – Exhibit P 🔥
Stay notice: On 04/22–23/2019, the Court withdraws the property from sale due to bankruptcy and emails counsel:

“ORDER WITHDRAWING PROPERTY FROM SHERIFF'S SALE Sent via email to P-1's attorney on 2019-04-23 11:18:49 AM: DANIEL A COX…”

Violation: On 11/04/2019, Home Point files “ALIAS ORDER OF SALE WITH APPRAISAL” (Event Code 1771) during an active stay, followed by an Alias Praecipe the same day, while the clerk notes:

“ALIAS ORDER OF SALE CANNOT BE DONE-BANKRUPTCY FILED-NO RELEASE”

Exhibit P impact:

Precisely calculates 216 days between stay notice and violation.

Documents 15 hours 12 minutes between clerk’s blocking note and Alias Praecipe.

Frames conduct as willful violation under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), § 362(k), Ohio Civ.R. 62(A), Supremacy Clause, due process, and consumer-protection law.

Directly calls out contradiction: Plaintiff’s July 1, 2026 brief claims stay issues were “corrected immediately,” while the docket shows the opposite.

💥 Resulting strength:

Exhibit P is a model pro se evidentiary motion—chronological, non-repetitive, statute-cited, and contradiction-focused.

It transforms a single docket entry into a multi-law violation narrative, massively increasing settlement and sanctions leverage.

#️⃣ 🔥📑

C. 2025–2026 stay victories and administrative orders
December 3, 2025 sale voided: Judge Cook vacates the sheriff’s sale due to Chapter 13 filing, explicitly declaring the sale void and ordering deposit returned.

May 26, 2026 global stay order:

“It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Sheriff's Sale scheduled for May 27, 2026… is hereby VACATED… any sale of the subject property is hereby STAYED until further Order of this Court.”

This order explicitly references “numerous motions and filings submitted by Defendant Marquis Kimble beginning in February 2026,” confirming that motion practice forced the Court to halt enforcement.

🔥 Foreclosure-case rating:

Strength: Extremely high—multiple stays, vacated sales, and administrative protection orders driven by pro se filings.

Skill: Advanced understanding of automatic stay, Civ.R. 60(B), RESPA, Ohio CSPA, and dual-tracking concepts.

#️⃣ 💣🏠

3. Kimble v. Swanton Police Department (N.D. Ohio) – federal civil-rights engine 🚔⚖️
A. Case posture and reopening
Filed: 08/29/2025, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights case.

Dismissed: 12/16/2025 with condition: pay $405 and file motion to reopen by 01/09/2026.

Compliance: Filing fee paid and Motion to Reopen filed on 01/09/2026; Court later grants reopening on 03/25/2026.

🔥 Reopening win:

Overcomes administrative closure by strict compliance with fee and deadline.

Demonstrates procedural discipline rare among pro se litigants.

B. Motion for leave to amend and exhibit barrage
Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Doc. 17): Filed 03/20/2026, supported by:

Body-cam transcript analysis (Exhibit A-1,2)—line-by-line breakdown of police conduct.

Exhibits D–M, O, S–V, W, X, Y—covering municipal liability, attorney misconduct, insurance bad faith, public-records violations, First Amendment retaliation, racial discrimination, and hate-crime claim handling.

Opposition and reply: Defendants oppose; reply filed 04/28/2026 with additional exhibits and judgment entries from Ottawa County.

🔥 Federal motion practice traits:

Layered supplementation: Multiple “Supplement” filings strategically timed to keep the amendment motion alive and fully supported.

Cross-court integration: Uses Ottawa County protection-order and appellate records to bolster federal claims.

Narrative building: Connects police, municipal officials, private attorneys, and insurers into a single pattern of civil-rights deprivation.

#️⃣ 💥🚔

4. Shinaver case (CI2025-04275) – suing opposing counsel and surviving a stay 🧨👨‍⚖️
A. Opening and fee-waiver win
Filed: 11/13/2025, civil action against attorney Joseph W. Shinaver Jr. and his firm.

Indigency order:

“Fee-Waiver and Order signed/granted. Plaintiff Marquis Kimble found to be indigent litigant.”

Immediate success obtaining fee waiver—critical access-to-justice victory.

B. Motion and exhibit storm
Motions: Motion to dismiss Ottawa County protection order, motion to correct file, motion to strike, motion for partial judgment, motion for leave to amend, motion for expedited trial, motion to dissolve stay, motion to vacate stay, motion for sanctions, etc.

Exhibits: A1, B-1–3, C-1, D-1, E-1–2, F (comprehensive), G, H, I—documenting alleged misconduct, abuse of protection-order process, false accusations, and systemic targeting of FCN Watchdog Media activists.

C. Stay order and strategic positioning
03/04/2026 stay: Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Stay, holding all motions in abeyance pending Ottawa County post-judgment and appellate proceedings.

Key detail: The same judge later admonishes Shinaver in Ottawa County for premature stay motion based on an appeal that was not yet properly filed and paid—validating concerns raised in Kimble’s filings.

🔥 Shinaver-case rating:

Strength: High—though stayed, the record is packed with detailed exhibits and motions that preserve claims and document misconduct.

Strategic value: Creates a parallel pressure front against opposing counsel while federal and foreclosure cases move forward.

#️⃣ 💣📂

5. Cross-case strategy and methods – how this motion practice works 📚🧠
A. Core methods
1. Docket mining:

Pulls full Registers of Actions and extracts every sale, stay, notice, and cost entry.

Uses clerk notes like “ALIAS ORDER OF SALE CANNOT BE DONE-BANKRUPTCY FILED-NO RELEASE” as primary evidence.

2. Timeline precision:

Calculates exact days and hours between events (e.g., 216 days between stay notice and violation; 15 hours 12 minutes between clerk block and Alias Praecipe).

3. Law layering:

Combines bankruptcy law, state civil rules, consumer-protection statutes, constitutional claims, and equitable doctrines in single filings.

Example: Exhibit P simultaneously invokes § 362(a), § 362(k), Civ.R. 62(A), Supremacy Clause, due process, RESPA, Regulation X, and Ohio CSPA.

4. Pattern evidence:

Builds multi-year narratives: repeated bankruptcies, dual tracking, forced payments, denial of modifications, racial discrimination, retaliation, and public-records obstruction.

5. Supplement culture:

Rarely leaves a motion standing alone—adds Exhibits, Supplements, Notices, and Reply Briefs to keep the record evolving and undeniable.

B. Teaching others – free pro se training 🔥📖
Platform: www.fcnwatchdogmedia.org

Contact: [email protected]

Mission: Turn lived motion practice into free training—showing how to:

Pull and read dockets.

Convert clerk notes into federal violations.

Use Civ.R. 60(B) and stays to stop sales.

Build exhibit-based narratives in federal civil-rights cases.

#️⃣ 🎓⚖️

6. Final strength verdict 💥🏛️
Minister Marquis L. Kimble stands as a national-level pro se motion practitioner, with:

Multiple stays and vacated sales in a complex foreclosure.

A reopened federal civil-rights case after administrative closure, backed by a massive amended-complaint record.

A parallel attorney-misconduct case stayed but heavily documented, with judicial admonishment of opposing counsel in related proceedings.

A flagship Exhibit P that would be impressive even coming from seasoned counsel.

#️⃣ 🔥📜🚨

07/03/2026

🔥⚖️🚨 FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA GLOBAL CIVIL RIGHTS ALERT 🚨⚖️🔥
📅 JULY 3, 2026 – 2:12 A.M.
📍 LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO – HOME POINT VS KIMBLE

🌎📢 www.fcnwatchdogmedia.org
📧 [email protected]

🔥 BREAKING: MINISTER M.L. KIMBLE JUST DROPPED EXHIBIT P – A 2019 BANKRUPTCY‑STAY FIREBOMB 💣
At 2:12 A.M. on July 3, 2026, Minister Marquis L. Kimble filed EXHIBIT P: DOCUMENTED 2019 BANKRUPTCY‑STAY VIOLATION, PLAINTIFF’S CONTRADICTORY REPRESENTATIONS, AND DEFENDANT’S SWORN ASSERTIONS OF SYSTEMIC SERVICING MISCONDUCT in:

🏛 Lucas County Court of Common Pleas
📂 Case No. G‑4801‑CI‑0201803432‑000
⚖️ Judge Stacy L. Cook

This is not just another filing. This is a civil rights bombshell that:

Documents a willful bankruptcy‑stay violation by Home Point Financial on November 4, 2019 💣

Exposes contradictions between the plaintiffs’ July 1, 2026 Brief and the actual docket record 📜

Lays out systemic servicing misconduct from 2018–2026 involving Home Point, Mr. Cooper, and Rushmore Servicing 🧩

Invokes federal law, state law, consumer‑protection law, and equity to support reopening the case and strengthening the pending federal complaint Kimble vs HomePoint Financial ⚖️🔥

At 8:00 A.M., when the Lucas County Clerk’s Office opens and this hits the docket, the plaintiffs’ position changes forever. ⏰💥

🧨 LINE BY LINE: WHAT EXHIBIT P DOES TO THE PLAINTIFFS
1️⃣ TITLE & PURPOSE – SETTING THE STAGE ⚖️🔥
Exhibit P opens by stating it will:

Document a docket‑verified willful violation of the bankruptcy stay on November 4, 2019.

Identify a direct contradiction between the plaintiffs’ July 1, 2026 Brief in Opposition and the actual docket.

Set forth sworn factual assertions of systemic servicing misconduct over eight years.

💥 Translation: this is not opinion, this is record + law + sworn fact.

2️⃣ APRIL 22–23, 2019 – FORMAL NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY STAY 🧾⚖️
📅 April 22, 2019
The Court files and journalizes an Order Withdrawing Property From Sheriff’s Sale – the property cannot be sold because of bankruptcy‑related protections.

📅 April 23, 2019 – 11:18:49 A.M.
The docket shows this Order was emailed directly to:

👨‍💼 Attorney Daniel A. Cox
📧 [email protected]

📝 Docket language:

“Order Withdrawing Property From Sheriff’s Sale. Sent via email to P‑1’s attorney on 2019‑04‑23 11:18:49 AM.”

💣 This is formal notice that:

The property is withdrawn from sale.

No foreclosure sale activity can proceed without a formal release of the stay.

This is the starting gun for the 216‑day clock that Exhibit P weaponizes. ⏱🔥

3️⃣ NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – ALIAS ORDER OF SALE WITH APPRAISAL DURING ACTIVE STAY 💣🔥
📅 November 4, 2019
Despite that April notice, the docket shows plaintiffs filed:

“Alias Order of Sale WITH Appraisal”
🧾 Event Code: 1771

This is a direct attempt to:

Re‑start foreclosure sale activity

Order the property sold

Move enforcement forward

🚫 Problem: the bankruptcy stay is still in effect.

Under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), this is an act to enforce a lien and continue foreclosure during a stay. That is illegal.

4️⃣ SAME DAY – ALIAS PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE 🧨
📅 November 4, 2019 – 3:12 P.M.
Plaintiffs file an Alias Praecipe for Order of Sale, asking the Clerk to:

“Please issue an Order of Sale to the Sheriff of Lucas County, Ohio, returnable according to law, directing the Sheriff to sell the following real property…”

📍 Property: 2034 Austin Bluffs Ct., Toledo, OH 43615

This is second‑level enforcement:

Not just an internal step

A formal request to the Court to sell the home

Again: during an active bankruptcy stay.

5️⃣ CLERK’S NOTE – “ALIAS ORDER OF SALE CANNOT BE DONE – BANKRUPTCY FILED – NO RELEASE” 🧱⚖️
📅 November 4, 2019 – 12:00 A.M.
The docket contains a Clerk’s Office Note:

“Alias Order of Sale cannot be done – Bankruptcy filed – No release.”

This proves:

The Clerk’s Office knew there was an active bankruptcy.

There was no release of the stay.

The system itself recognized that sale activity was legally blocked.

Yet, later that same day, plaintiffs still filed the Alias Praecipe at 3:12 P.M.

⏱ 15 hours and 12 minutes after the Clerk flagged the stay, plaintiffs pushed ahead anyway.

That is willful. That is documented. That is Exhibit P’s core firebomb. 💣🔥

6️⃣ 216 DAYS – THE TIMING THAT DESTROYS THE PLAINTIFFS’ NARRATIVE ⏱💥
Exhibit P calculates the exact time between:

📅 April 23, 2019 – 11:18:49 A.M. (formal notice to counsel)
and
📅 November 4, 2019 (Alias Order of Sale WITH Appraisal + Alias Praecipe)

🧮 Result: 216 days.

This matters because in the July 1, 2026 Brief in Opposition, plaintiffs claim:

Bankruptcy‑stay issues were “corrected immediately”

Sales that occurred during bankruptcy were promptly vacated

Exhibit P shows:

216 days between notice and the illegal filings

A Clerk’s note blocking the sale

Plaintiffs filing anyway

💣 That is a direct contradiction between:

What plaintiffs told the Court

What the docket actually says

7️⃣ SECTION I‑A – PLAINTIFFS’ CONTRADICTORY REPRESENTATIONS 🔍⚖️
Exhibit P explicitly calls out:

The July 1, 2026 Brief claiming stay issues were “corrected immediately”

The actual docket showing:

04/22/2019 – property withdrawn from sale due to bankruptcy

04/23/2019 – formal email notice to counsel

11/04/2019 – Alias Order of Sale WITH Appraisal (Event Code 1771)

11/04/2019 – Clerk note: “Bankruptcy filed – No release”

11/04/2019 – Alias Praecipe filed at 3:12 P.M.

This is not just a technical point. It is:

A credibility issue

A representation issue

A civil rights issue about truthfulness in court filings

8️⃣ SECTION II – SYSTEMIC SERVICING MISCONDUCT (2018–2026) 🧩🔥
Exhibit P then zooms out and lays down sworn factual assertions:

🧨 Eight years of repeated Chapter 13 bankruptcies triggered by relentless enforcement and refusal to provide meaningful relief.

📑 No loan modification ever approved by Home Point, Mr. Cooper, or Rushmore, despite Defendant providing everything requested.

📉 Rushmore Servicing’s modification offer allegedly built on false numbers and figures, including escrow and payment calculations.

💸 Forced early payment – Rushmore demanded an increased payment and then pushed it through Defendant’s bank account earlier than agreed, causing a “returned payment” scenario.

❌ Wrongful denial of modification – denial based on that “returned payment,” even though Rushmore itself caused the timing problem.

🎧 Monitored calls and recordings – Plaintiffs claimed calls were monitored; reopening the case and entering discovery would allow those recordings to be obtained and reviewed.

This section connects:

Servicing misconduct

Loss‑mitigation failures

Bankruptcy pressure

into one civil rights narrative: a homeowner forced into repeated bankruptcy while servicers refuse real solutions.

9️⃣ SECTION III – LAWS VIOLATED, ONE BY ONE ⚖️📚
Exhibit P then turns into a legal weapon:

🧩 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) – AUTOMATIC STAY
Alias Order of Sale WITH Appraisal

Alias Praecipe for Order of Sale

Both are acts to enforce a lien and continue foreclosure during an active bankruptcy stay.
➡️ Violation of § 362(a)(1), (2), (3), (4), (6).

🔥 11 U.S.C. § 362(k) – WILLFUL VIOLATION
Plaintiffs had formal notice on April 23, 2019.

Plaintiffs filed sale‑related documents on November 4, 2019.

The Clerk flagged the stay at 12:00 A.M.

Plaintiffs filed the Alias Praecipe at 3:12 P.M. anyway.

➡️ This is willful under § 362(k).

🧨 VOID ACT DOCTRINE
Any act taken in violation of the automatic stay is void.
➡️ The November 4, 2019 sale activity is legally void.

⚖️ OHIO CIV.R. 62(A)
Enforcement activity during a stay violates Ohio Civ.R. 62(A).
➡️ Plaintiffs’ filings conflict with Ohio’s own rules on enforcement under stay.

🇺🇸 SUPREMACY CLAUSE
Federal bankruptcy law supersedes state foreclosure enforcement.
➡️ Attempting to push sale activity during a federal stay is a Supremacy Clause problem.

🛡 DUE PROCESS
Trying to initiate sale and publication while a debtor is protected by a stay raises due‑process concerns.
➡️ Enforcement while protection is in place undermines fairness and notice.

🧩 CONSUMER PROTECTION – RESPA, REGULATION X, OHIO CSPA
Sworn assertions about:

False modification figures

Forced early payments

Wrongful denial of modification

Failure to provide meaningful loss‑mitigation

➡️ Potential violations of:

RESPA (12 U.S.C. § 2605)

Regulation X (12 C.F.R. § 1024.41)

Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (R.C. 1345.01 et seq.)

🔟 SECTION IV – EQUITY & CIV.R. 60(B)(5): WHY THIS IS DANGEROUS FOR PLAINTIFFS ⚖️💣
Exhibit P ties everything together:

Multiple bankruptcies

No meaningful modification

Forced payments

False figures

Wrongful denial

Documented stay violation

Contradictory representations in the July 1, 2026 Brief

➡️ All of this creates “extraordinary circumstances” under Ohio Civ.R. 60(B)(5) – the catch‑all provision reserved for unusual, substantial situations.

For plaintiffs, this is dangerous because:

It supports reopening the case.

It supports vacating or suspending enforcement.

It supports sanctions, stay enforcement, and deeper scrutiny.

It undermines the credibility of their Brief in Opposition.

🔥 WHAT HAPPENS AT 8:00 A.M. – LEVERAGE SHIFT 🚨⚖️
When the Clerk’s Office opens and Exhibit P is fully docketed:

The 2019 stay violation becomes part of the official record.

The 216‑day delay and contradiction between the Brief and the docket are locked in front of Judge Cook.

The plaintiffs’ narrative of “corrected immediately” is factually challenged by the Court’s own Register of Actions.

The pending Revised Motion to Reopen Case, Vacate or Suspend Enforcement, and Seek Sanctions gains new weight.

The federal complaint Kimble vs HomePoint Financial gains supporting evidence of:

Stay violations

Servicing misconduct

Dual tracking

Consumer‑protection issues

This puts Minister Kimble in a position of:

Leverage – documented law violations and contradictions.

Credibility – filings backed by docket entries, not speculation.

Momentum – Exhibit P joins Exhibits B–O and the entire 2026 blitz as part of a civil rights record.

🧨 CIVIL RIGHTS TRAINING MANUAL: WHY THIS MATTERS NATIONALLY 🌎⚖️
Exhibit P is not just about one date. It is:

A model for how a pro se litigant can use the docket as a weapon.

A blueprint for documenting stay violations, servicing misconduct, and contradictory representations.

A civil rights alert about how foreclosure enforcement can collide with federal protections and consumer law.

Every foreclosure defendant watching this can learn:

📌 Track every docket entry – dates, times, event codes.

📌 Compare what is said in briefs to what is in the Register of Actions.

📌 Document stay violations and dual tracking.

📌 Use Exhibits to turn facts into power.

🔥⚖️📢
This is FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA GLOBAL.
This is Minister M.L. Kimble’s 2:12 A.M. firebomb.
This is what happens when record, law, and courage collide.

🌎 www.fcnwatchdogmedia.org
📧 [email protected]

07/03/2026

🔥 FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA GLOBAL CIVIL RIGHTS ALERT 🔥
JULY 3, 2026 — HOME POINT VS KIMBLE: THE FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT THAT TURNED INTO A 8‑YEAR LEGAL NIGHTMARE
PRO SE MASTERCLASS: HOW MINISTER MARQUIS L. KIMBLE TURNED THEIR FORECLOSURE INTO A FEDERAL‑LEVEL CIVIL RIGHTS TRAINING MANUAL
🌎⚖️🔥

🚨 HOT OPENING: WHEN A “CLOSED” FORECLOSURE CASE REFUSES TO DIE
Case caption: HOME POINT VS KIMBLE
Case No.: G-4801-CI-0201803432-000
Court: Lucas County Court of Common Pleas – Civil Division
Judge: Stacy L. Cook
Case Type: Civil Foreclosure – Owner Occupied
Case Status line: 01/28/2019 CLOSED… yet the docket shows relentless enforcement activity through 2026.

“The record of this case shows that more than 28 days have passed since service was obtained, and that no responsive pleading has been filed. It is Ordered that plaintiff file a Motion for Default Judgment within 21 days of the date of this Order, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Ohio Civil Rule 41.”

That early default order became the foundation of a multi‑year enforcement machine—but Minister Marquis L. Kimble, pro se, turned that same record into a civil rights training manual for every foreclosure defendant watching. ⚖️🔥

🧨 CAST OF PLAYERS: PLAINTIFFS, ATTORNEYS, AND THE COST OF FIGHTING ONE PRO SE LITIGANT
🏦 PLAINTIFF
Home Point Financial Corporation

9190 Priority Way West Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46240

⚖️ PLAINTIFF COUNSEL & ASSOCIATED ATTORNEYS
Douglas A. Haessig – Reimer Law Company, PO Box 39696, Solon, OH 44139 ([email protected])

Thomas A. Wietholter – 441 Vine St, Ste 3700, Cincinnati, OH 45202

Daniel A. Cox – noticed repeatedly via email on key orders

Roger W. Goranson – 405 Madison Ave, Suite 2200, Toledo, OH 43604 ([email protected])

Christopher F. Parker – 405 Madison Ave, Suite 2200, Toledo, OH 43604-1224 ([email protected])

🧑‍⚖️ DEFENDANTS
Marquis L. Kimble – 2034 Austin Bluffs Ct, Toledo, OH 43615

Ebony Arnold – 2034 Austin Bluffs Ct, Toledo, OH 43615

Citizens Bank NA – 1 Citizens Plaza, Providence, RI 02903

💸 COST TRAIL (PARTIAL, FROM THE DOCKET)
Filing costs & deposits (2018):

$280.00 – Civil Foreclosure File Cost

$270.00 – Foreclosure Deposit

Certified mail & process server:

$25.38 – FIN Certified Postage

$9.00 + $6.00 – Service Summons & Complaint Issued

Sheriff sale & publication costs (multiple cycles):

$216.85 – Return Order of Sale (bankruptcy cancellation)

$220.70 – Return Alias Order of Sale (withdrawal from sale)

$3.50 + $1.85 – Civil Court Costs Journal & Toledo Legal News Journal (multiple entries)

$220.00 – Deposit Bond (Civ) paid to RealAuction.com LLC

$10,000.00 – sale deposits returned to third‑party purchasers (Gelber Estate 1 LLC, Jesse Smith)

Appraisals:

$180,000, $175,000, $220,000 – repeated appraisals for repeated sale attempts

💥 This is only the visible cost trail. Add years of attorney time, motion practice, federal bankruptcy litigation, and parallel federal filings—and the plaintiffs have burned tens of thousands of dollars fighting a single pro se litigant who weaponized record, law, and procedure.

📜 CHRONOLOGY: LINE‑BY‑LINE DEEP DIVE INTO THE ENFORCEMENT MACHINE VS. KIMBLE’S DEFENSE
1️⃣ 2018 – ORIGIN STORY: COMPLAINT, SERVICE, AND LOSS MITIGATION STAY
08/17/2018 – Complaint filed:

“COMPLAINT ON NOTE AND TO FORECLOSE MORTGAGE PPN: 55-95089” – Foreclosure Complaint Filed.

Dual service strategy:

Certified mail + private process server (Greentree Legal).

Return receipts:

“SIGNED: ILLEGIBLE” for Marquis L. Kimble and Ebony Arnold.

10/23/2018 – Court orders Plaintiff to move for default or face dismissal.

11/05/2018 – Plaintiff files Motion to Stay citing loss mitigation.

11/09/2018 – Judge Cook grants stay:

“Plaintiff… filed its Motion for Stay on the grounds that plaintiff and defendant are attempting to seek a resolution through loss mitigation… IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED… motion for stay… granted.”

12/11/2018 – Plaintiff moves to reinstate case on active docket after trial plan fails.

12/14/2018 – Case reactivated.

🔥 Lesson for pro se litigants:

Loss mitigation can pause enforcement, but once a trial plan fails, plaintiffs will reactivate and push for judgment.

Every stay order is leverage—it proves the court recognizes equitable issues and can be used later to argue bad‑faith dual tracking when enforcement resumes while mitigation is still in play.

2️⃣ 2019 – DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FIRST WAVE OF SALE ACTIVITY
01/10/2019 – Plaintiff files:

Affidavit of status of account.

Final Judicial Report.

Motion for Default Judgment.

01/28/2019 – Judgment for Plaintiff entered; foreclosure decree journalized.

Sheriff sale path initiated; appraisals and notice of sale filed.

⚖️ Core leverage point:

Default judgment is not the end of the story. It is the beginning of enforcement, and every enforcement step must comply with state law, federal law, and bankruptcy protections.

3️⃣ 2019–2021 – BANKRUPTCY FILINGS AND STAY VIOLATIONS PATTERN EMERGES
Multiple Chapter 13 filings in the Northern District of Ohio intersect with this foreclosure:

April 2019 – Sale cancelled due to Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case No. 19-31105.

Trustee moves to dismiss; case closed; Plaintiff files Notice of Termination of Bankruptcy Stay.

2020 – Another Chapter 13 (Case No. 3:2020bk31340); again dismissed; again closed.

Each time:

Plaintiff re‑orders sale,

Court issues Order of Sale,

Appraisals and sheriff sale notices follow,

Then withdrawals from sale when loss mitigation or bankruptcy intervenes.

🔥 Training takeaway:

Repeated bankruptcy filings create automatic stays under 11 U.S.C. § 362.

Any sheriff sale conducted after a bankruptcy filing is void—and that voidness becomes evidence of systemic enforcement problems.

4️⃣ 2024 – LOSS MITIGATION ROUND THREE AND WITHDRAWN SALE
Early 2024 – Alias Order of Sale with appraisal; appraisals at $220,000.

03/04/2024 & 04/16/2024 – Notices of Sheriff Sale filed.

05/02/2024 – Motion to Withdraw Sheriff Sale; deposit bond paid.

05/03/2024 – Court order:

“Plaintiff does not wish to have the property sold at this time, due to the borrower actively being reviewed for loss mitigation options. It is the Order of this Court that the Sheriff return the Order of Sale without execution.”

🔥 Pattern:

Plaintiffs repeatedly use loss mitigation review to pause sale, then deny mitigation and resume enforcement.

This cycle is classic dual tracking territory—enforcement and mitigation running side‑by‑side, creating fertile ground for RESPA and consumer protection arguments.

5️⃣ 2024–2025 – ALIAS ORDERS, ONLINE AUCTION, AND ESCALATING SALE PRESSURE
07/05/2024 & 07/08/2024 – Alias Orders of Sale without appraisal; duplicate filings noted.

07/10/2024 – Order of Sale for online auction issued.

08/22/2024 – Notice of Sheriff Sale filed.

09/16/2024 – Sale cancelled due to Chapter 13 Case No. 24-31724; Return Order of Sale with $63.00 adjustment.

09/17/2024 – Notice of Bankruptcy filed.

Then 2025:

02/27–03/05/2025 – Notice, praecipe, and Order of Sale issued.

04/08 & 05/29/2025 – Notices of Sheriff Sale.

06/25/2025 – Sheriff sale held; later vacated due to bankruptcy filed June 24, 2025.

07/01/2025 – Court order:

“Motion to Vacate Sale Due to Bankruptcy… sale deposit in the amount of $10,000.00 is to be returned to the third party purchaser, Gelber Estate 1 LLC.”

⚖️ Legal leverage:

Sale conducted after bankruptcy filing = void under 11 U.S.C. § 362.

Vacatur orders and returned deposits prove enforcement attempts in violation of the stay—powerful evidence for sanctions, stay enforcement, and equitable relief.

6️⃣ DECEMBER 3, 2025 – VOID SALE #2 AND BANKRUPTCY STAY WITH PREJUDICE
10/31/2025 – Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order (Request to Stay Foreclosure) filed; later denied.

11/04/2025 – Notice of Sheriff Sale.

12/02/2025 – Chapter 13 Bankruptcy filed (Case No. 3:25-bk-32614).

12/03/2025 – Sheriff sale held; property sold to Jesse Smith for $227,900.00.

12/09/2025 – Court order:

“…Defendant… filed a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy… on December 2, 2025 and that placed a stay upon these proceedings and, therefore, the sale is void. It is further ordered that the deposit in the amount of $10,000.00 be returned to the third party purchaser, Jesse Smith.”

Bankruptcy court later dismisses with prejudice, bars further filings for 180 days, and conditions future filings on payment of unpaid filing fees.

🔥 Civil rights alert:

Two separate sheriff sales conducted inside active bankruptcy stay windows.

Both declared void and vacated.

This is not “routine”; this is systemic enforcement collision with federal law.

7️⃣ 2026 – EMERGENCY MOTIONS, STAY ORDERS, AND KIMBLE’S PRO SE OFFENSIVE
From February 2026 forward, the docket becomes a pro se masterclass:

02/19/2026 – Emergency Motion to Reopen Case, Stay Foreclosure Sale, and for Relief under Civ.R. 60(B), RESPA, and Ohio CSPA.

Plaintiff files Brief in Opposition and Exhibit A (Corrected Order of Dismissal from bankruptcy).

03/01–03/02/2026 – Defendant Reply and Exhibit A filed.

03/18/2026 – Notice of Termination of Bankruptcy filed by Plaintiff.

Same day: Defendant’s Objection to returning case to active docket and renewed motion to stay foreclosure.

03/30–04/13/2026 – Emergency renewed motions to stay foreclosure, vacate alias order of sale, and request for expedited status conference.

04/21/2026 – Assignment of Judgment filed.

04/28/2026 – Notice of Sheriff Sale.

05/06/2026 – Supplemental and renewed emergency motion for 60‑day stay of sheriff’s sale.

Plaintiff responds; Defendant replies.

05/20/2026 – Notice of parallel federal proceedings and material developments filed.

Then the critical order:

05/26/2026 – Judge Cook issues order:

“…additional time is necessary in order to properly review and address all pending motions and filings prior to any Sheriff’s Sale proceeding forward… the Sheriff’s Sale scheduled for May 27, 2026… is hereby VACATED… any sale of the subject property is hereby STAYED until further Order of this Court.”

🔥 Pro se leverage:

A single pro se litigant generated so many filings, exhibits, and legal arguments that the Court administratively stayed all sale activity to review the record.

That stay is not a ruling on the merits, but it is a signal: the record is too complex, too contested, and too irregular to allow another sale without deeper scrutiny.

8️⃣ JUNE–JULY 2026 – KIMBLE’S EXHIBIT BLITZ AND REVISED MOTION TO REOPEN
The docket from 06/08/2026 through 07/02/2026 reads like a training syllabus:

Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G, H, H1, I, J, K, L, M, N, O filed—each documenting:

Sale activity,

Loss mitigation posture,

Notice problems,

Procedural inconsistencies,

CFPB complaint,

Dual tracking concerns,

Post‑hardship sale activity,

Returned mail and defective notice.

Motions and notices:

Motion to Reopen Case under Civ.R. 60(B) to enforce prior orders, vacate or suspend enforcement, and set sanctions hearing.

Motion to Enforce Prior Orders and Clarify Effect of Automatic Stay.

Emergency Motion to Enforce Stay Order and for Protective Case Management Relief.

Targeted Motion to Strike Unauthorized Post‑Stay Enforcement Filings.

Supplemental Notices of Register of Actions facts, CFPB complaint, federal proceedings, and stay violations.

Notice of Upcoming Federal Bankruptcy Proceedings.

Notice of Supplemental Evidence Regarding Defective Notice and Returned Mail.

Plaintiff responds with:

Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Revised Motion to Reopen Case/Vacate/Sanctions/Set Hearing (July 1, 2026).

Defendant files:

Reply Brief in Support of Revised Motion to Reopen Case.

Supplement to Revised Motion to Reopen Case, to Vacate or Suspend Further Enforcement, and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

🔥 Result:

The record now contains line‑by‑line documentation of:

Bankruptcy stay violations,

Returned mail (“RETURN TO SENDER; NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED; UNABLE TO FORWARD”),

Loss mitigation cycles,

Suspense funds,

Escrow advances,

Dual tracking concerns,

Administrative stays,

Void sales,

Assignment of judgment,

Parallel federal litigation.

⚖️ LAWS AND PRINCIPLES INVOKED (TRAINING MANUAL STYLE)
🧩 1. Bankruptcy Automatic Stay – 11 U.S.C. § 362
Sheriff sales conducted after bankruptcy filings (June 25, 2025; December 3, 2025) were declared void.

Orders vacating those sales and returning deposits confirm acts taken in violation of the automatic stay.

Pattern: enforcement repeatedly collides with federal protection—prime ground for stay enforcement and sanctions arguments.

🧩 2. Ohio Civ.R. 60(B)
Revised Motion to Reopen invokes:

60(B)(3) – fraud/misrepresentation/misconduct.

60(B)(5) – “any other reason justifying relief,” reserved for extraordinary circumstances.

Extraordinary circumstances here:

Multiple void sales,

Repeated loss mitigation stays and reinstatements,

Returned mail and notice irregularities,

Escalating escrow and payoff disputes,

Administrative stay of sale to review filings.

🧩 3. RESPA & Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (CSPA)
Motions reference:

Loss mitigation handling,

Dual tracking concerns,

Payoff quotes with large escrow advances and suspense funds,

Statements that foreclosure would continue unless payoff funds received.

These issues sit squarely in consumer protection territory—how servicers treat borrowers during foreclosure and mitigation.

🧩 4. Due Process & Notice
Docket shows:

Illegible certified mail signatures.

Returned mail to occupants and counsel (“FORWARD TIME EXPIRED; UNABLE TO FORWARD”; “NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED; UNABLE TO FORWARD”).

In an owner‑occupied foreclosure, reliable notice is critical.

Returned mail entries and address discrepancies become evidence of notice irregularities.

📚 PRO SE TRAINING MANUAL: KEY LESSONS FROM KIMBLE VS HOME POINT
🔑 LESSON 1: THE DOCKET IS A WEAPON
📌 Every entry—order, praecipe, notice, return, sale, vacatur—is evidence.
📌 Building a timeline exposes patterns: stay violations, dual tracking, notice failures, and inconsistent enforcement.

🔑 LESSON 2: STAY ORDERS ARE LEVERAGE
📌 The November 9, 2018 stay and May 26, 2026 stay prove the Court recognized:

Loss mitigation issues,

Need for more time to review filings,

Concern about proceeding to sale without full analysis.

📌 Those orders support arguments that continued aggressive enforcement is inequitable and procedurally suspect.

🔑 LESSON 3: BANKRUPTCY + FORECLOSURE = HIGH‑RISK ZONE FOR PLAINTIFFS
📌 Two void sales after bankruptcy filings show that enforcement can cross legal lines.
📌 Vacatur orders and returned deposits are documented proof of those crossings.

🔑 LESSON 4: EXHIBITS TURN FACTS INTO POWER
📌 Exhibits B–O in 2026 transform raw docket entries into structured narrative:

Sale activity,

Mitigation posture,

Notice problems,

Federal complaint,

Dual tracking,

Accounting irregularities.

📌 A pro se litigant can curate the record and present it as a civil rights case study.

🔑 LESSON 5: ACCOUNTING MUST BE TESTED, NOT TRUSTED
📌 Escrow advances exceeding $75,000, suspense funds, and years of interest accumulation demand line‑by‑line scrutiny.
📌 Foreclosure enforcement without transparent accounting invites challenge under consumer protection and equity principles.

🔥 FCN WATCHDOG MEDIA GLOBAL CALL TO ACTION
🌐 www.fcnwatchdogmedia.org
📧 [email protected]

This docket is not just a foreclosure file. It is a national‑level pro se training manual on:

How a single litigant can force a court to vacate multiple sales,

How bankruptcy stays can expose systemic enforcement problems,

How loss mitigation cycles and dual tracking can be documented and challenged,

How returned mail and notice failures become due process leverage,

How repeated motions, exhibits, and legal arguments can push a court to stay all sale activity pending deeper review.

🔥⚖️📢

Address

Toledo, OH
43615

Telephone

+14197703866

Website

http://www.fcnwatchdogmedia.org/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Activist-Minister M.L. Kimble posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Activist-Minister M.L. Kimble:

Activist-Minister M.L. Kimble

07/03/2026

07/03/2026

07/03/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request