Satawa Law, Pllc

09/16/2026

Are Juries Biased Against Men In Sexual Assault Cases? Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyer Responds

Watch here: https://youtu.be/ewxE594KDu8

www.protectingyourfuture.infoSatawa Law, PLLC26777 Central Park...

09/14/2026

Your phone should be a tool -- not act like a spy.
The Fourth Amendment protects your digital privacy.
That means your location data is private, even when held by a tech company.
Know your rights. Protect your privacy.

09/10/2026

📍 Your phone knows where you’ve been. But can the government access that information without implicating the Fourth Amendment?

In Chatrie v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed an important question about privacy in the digital age: whether law enforcement conducts a Fourth Amendment search when it obtains cell-phone location data from a technology company through a geofence warrant.

The Court held that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell-phone location information. The fact that this information is held by a third-party technology company does not automatically eliminate Fourth Amendment protection.

Geofence warrants allow law enforcement to identify devices located within a particular geographic area during a specific period of time. That technology raises significant questions about privacy, probable cause, and the government's ability to obtain information about the movements of potentially innocent people.

The Court's decision does not mean that every geofence warrant is unconstitutional. Instead, it establishes that obtaining this type of location information is a Fourth Amendment search and that the government's access to it must be evaluated under Fourth Amendment standards.

As technology continues to collect increasingly detailed information about our lives, the Fourth Amendment remains an important safeguard against unreasonable government intrusion.

Know your rights. Protect your privacy.

SATAWA LAW
Criminal Defense & Civil Litigation

For educational purposes only. This content is not legal advice.

09/08/2026

Do All Sexual Assault Cases Go to Trial? Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney Explains

Watch here: https://youtu.be/rHnyT7PbY08

www.protectingyourfuture.infoSatawa Law, PLLC26777 Central Park...

09/01/2026

As students return to college and freshmen arrive on campus for the first time, it is important to understand your Title IX rights.

A Title IX accusation can have serious consequences for a student’s education, reputation, and future. But being accused does not mean a violation has been proven.

The Due Process laws of the Constitution, United States Supreme Court precedent, precedent from the federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Education and published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFRs) grant students accused of violating Title IX several very important due process rights.

If you or your student faces a Title IX investigation or allegation, understanding these rights is critical. You do not have to navigate the process alone.

Know your rights. Protect your education. Protect your future.

For educational purposes only. This post does not constitute legal advice.

08/27/2026

Convicted Of Sexual Assault Without Physical Evidence: Michigan Criminal Defense Lawyer Explains How

Watch here: https://youtu.be/clDdH4DhCrg

www.protectingyourfuture.infoSatawa Law, PLLC26777 Central Park...

08/25/2026

08/25/2026

🎓 Back to campus means new classes, new friends, new experiences but it’s also important for students to know their rights.

A Title IX allegation is more than “just a school matter.” The process can move quickly, and students may not fully understand their rights or what’s expected of them when an investigation begins.

If you or your student is facing a Title IX investigation, don’t wait until the situation escalates to seek guidance.

Know your rights. Protect your future.

📞 Contact Satawa Law to discuss your situation.

08/19/2026

Satawa Law recently has won another Title IX hearing, as a Title 9 Hearing Panel at a local Michigan University determined:

⚖️ “The Decision-Maker panel has determined that the Respondent is not responsible for all alleged violations under the Preponderance of Evidence Standard.

⚖️“The Decision Makers concluded there is insufficient evidence to make a responsible finding for s*xual assault.”

⚖️“The Decision Makers concluded that there is insufficient evidence to make a responsible finding of dating violence.”

The client was a university freshman, just starting his college experience. He accused by a fellow student, who was a friend, then friends with benefits, and ultimately his girlfriend. The day after they hooked up again, and then he told her that he did not think they would ever be/stay in a long term relationship, she accused him of s*xual assault and dating violence. Following a contested hearing, the Decision-Making Panel dismissed the case, and now the client can complete his college degree, graduate, and pursue a successful career after graduation.

Justice achieved, and another innocent student, falsely accused, vindicated. When it comes to Title IX defense, and false allegations of campus s*xual assault, Satawa Law will defend your rights, and protect your future. www.protectingyourfuture.info