Professor Lawyer

Professor Lawyer We provide the best consulting services for businesses all over the world and in every industry. Eric M. In addition to his legal and business acumen, Mr.

Myers, Esq., JD, MIBA, is a seasoned attorney and business strategist with over two decades of experience in law and international business. Fluent in Spanish, he has worked with major financial institutions such as Bank of America and Goldman Sachs, providing strategic business advice in high-stakes situations and contributing to advancements in corporate practices. His expertise lies in navigati

ng complex legal and regulatory environments, particularly in international trade, economic development, and compliance across jurisdictions. Myers is an accomplished professor, teaching International Business, International Law, and Business Law in both the U.S. and Colombia. His academic work bridges theory and practice, equipping students with the knowledge and skills needed to tackle real-world challenges in international commerce and trade policy.

03/02/2026

If a president ignores a court order… who stops them?

Courts don’t command troops.
They don’t control funding.
They rely on something far more fragile — the constitutional structure.

Here’s what most people don’t realize about how enforcement really works.

— ProfessorLawyer

02/25/2026

Most people saw the headlines about the Alex Pretti case… but didn’t see what the law really says about it.⚖️

In this video, I break down what happened, why the legal details matter, and what you should do if you’re ever in a similar situation — from knowing your rights to how investigations actually work. 👩⚖️📚

Watch, learn, and be empowered.
— ProfessorLawyer

02/04/2026

Knowing your rights matters—but knowing how to exercise them matters more.
In real-life encounters, clarity and precision can change outcomes.
This is how the law actually works, beyond slogans and assumptions.

01/30/2026

Law isn’t just rules and punishment.
It’s the system that prevents society from collapsing into raw power.

When law fails, fear replaces order — and nothing functions the same.

— ProfessorLawyer

01/28/2026

When deadly force is used by law enforcement, the legal question isn’t just what happened — it’s who has the authority to decide accountability.

This distinction matters more than most people realize.

— ProfessorLawyer

01/22/2026

When a fatal shooting involving federal agents makes headlines, emotions run high.
But the legal analysis doesn’t turn on outrage or hindsight — it turns on standards most people are never taught.
Understanding how deadly force is actually evaluated matters more than most realize.

11/26/2025

What an Illegal Order Actually Is — And Why People Don’t Want You Asking Questions About Those Venezuelan Boats

The loudest people screaming “TREASON!” at Senator Mark Kelly don’t want anyone to understand what the UCMJ actually says- Because once you understand it, you start realizing why certain things happening right now look… bad.

So here’s the lesson they’re terrified you’ll read:

👉 U.S. troops are REQUIRED under the Uniform Code of Military Justice to refuse illegal orders — not encouraged, not suggested, REQUIRED.
👉 If they obey an illegal order, THEY can be prosecuted.
👉 And some of the orders floating around right now might be illegal as hell.

Let’s unpack this the way adults do.



🔵 1. What the UCMJ actually demands — not what Facebook influencers pretend it says

A lawful order must:

✔️ Be legal
✔️ Be within the authority of the commander
✔️ Follow U.S. law, treaties, and the law of armed conflict
✔️ Use force only when force is legally justified

An unlawful order is any command that tells a service member to:

❌ Kill people who are not lawful combatants
❌ Use lethal force where force isn’t legally justified
❌ Target civilians or noncombatants
❌ Break U.S. criminal law
❌ Violate maritime or international law
❌ Act outside congressional authorization
❌ Treat law enforcement situations like war

If a recruit followed one of these in basic training, they’d flunk the test.

If a soldier follows it in real life, they can be charged with a crime.

But, the people that are shrieking “treason!” hope you don’t know that.



🔵 **2. When is it actually legal to shoot a vessel on the high seas?

(Hint: almost never)**

Under U.S. law and international maritime law, lethal force is only authorized when:

✔️ A. The vessel is actively threatening U.S. forces

Ramming, firing, hostile intent — a real threat, not a guess.

✔️ B. The vessel is a legitimate military target in an armed conflict

Which requires…
• A declared war
• OR a congressionally authorized war
• OR an internationally recognized armed conflict

We’re not at war with Venezuela.
Nobody even pretends otherwise.

✔️ C. Non-lethal force failed and lethal force is necessary to protect life

Not to “speed up interdiction.”
Not because “they ran.”
Not because “it might be drugs.”

SUSPECTED smuggling doesn’t make a vessel a combat target.

Ever.



🔵 3. The part that suddenly got awkward: the Venezuelan boats

The administration has admitted that U.S. forces have shot Venezuelan vessels out of the water and then justified it by saying:

“They were drug boats.”

Okay.
Even if that’s true, let’s be honest:

🇺🇸 Drug smuggling is a crime, not warfare
⚓ It does not create combatant status
🚤 It does not authorize sinking a vessel
⚖️ It does not bypass international law
🛑 It does not justify lethal force

So ask the obvious question:

👉 Who gave the order to fire?
👉 Under what authority?
👉 Where was the imminent threat?
👉 Why weren’t normal interdiction steps used?

If the answers don’t line up with the law?

Then the order was illegal and troops were required to refuse it.

That’s not my opinion.
That’s the UCMJ.



🔵 4. Why they’re attacking Mark Kelly instead of answering questions

Because once Americans understand what an “illegal order” actually is, they start noticing things:

• Some troops are being told to do things on U.S. soil that look like law enforcement without authority
• Some units are being used in ways that stretch or violate congressional limits
• And yes — some maritime engagements look like they jumped straight to lethal force without legal justification

If voters learn the actual rules, the narrative collapses.

So instead of explaining the law, certain people scream “TREASON!” and hope the noise covers the details.



🔵 5. Here’s the truth they don’t want you repeating

👉 The U.S. military answers to the Constitution — not any individual.
👉 Lawful orders must be obeyed.
👉 Unlawful orders must be refused.
👉 If someone in ExSeth’s Pentagon issued commands to sink vessels that weren’t lawful targets, those were illegal orders.
👉 Mark Kelly isn’t the problem.
👉 The people abusing the military to do things the law doesn’t allow are.

The moment you understand this, the shouting loses its power.

Knowledge is kryptonite to people who rely on confusion.

And that’s why they hate posts like this- So, Please...share, Share, and SHARE this post. 🙌🇺🇸

🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸

*Text Credit reporter*

Address

7901 4th Street N, Suite 300
Saint Petersburg, FL
33702

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Professor Lawyer posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Professor Lawyer:

Share