09/29/2023
Untangle Non-Compliance from Non-Adherence
When a client’s motive for not following medical guidance is brought into question, you will undoubtedly hear the term non-compliance thrown around. This word holds an incredibly strong negative connotation and can impair a person’s reputation simply by association. Though not intentional, even the jury and others in the courtroom may have unfavorable pre-conceived ideas about this label and this could influence outcomes. When faced with an accusation of non-compliance, it is extremely important to understand that non-compliance is not always an accurate description of a client’s behavior.
According the the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the term non-compliance means the failure or refusal to comply with something. This definition appears to assume a willful disregard for that which is to be obeyed or “complied” with. In contrast, non-adherence is defined as “a lack of adherence”. Unless there is intentional non-adherence, it is NOT equal to non-compliance.
When investigating to determine which term most accurately fits the situation, you must know WHY the medication, treatment, instructions, etc. were not followed. It may come as a surprise to learn a few of the reasons for non-adherence that initially appear to be non-compliance are as follows:
✳️ A language barrier
✳️ Hearing loss
✳️ Inability to read
✳️ Discharge instructions or other instructions not
provided
✳️ Contradictory advice from another healthcare
provider
✳️ Cognitive impairment
✳️ Certain mental disorders
✳️ No transportation
While the preceding list is not all inclusive, it paints a clear picture of how easily non-compliance can be assumed when it is most certainly not a factor. Your client depends on you to look deeper into those medical records and be prepared with a logical response.