06/18/2026
This is a significant victory for cannabis consumers' Second Amendment rights. In a unanimous 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court held that a regular cannabis consumer cannot be prosecuted for violating 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3) which prohibits "an unlawful user of a controlled substance" from possessing a firearm absent actual evidence of intoxication at the time of possession.
Mr. Hemani was found to be in possession of a firearm and cannabis. He admitted using cannabis "every other day". There was no evidence he was "high" at the time he possessed the firearm.
The Department of Justice argued that prosecuting Hemani was consisted with Colonial America's history and tradition of disarming drunkards.
Writing for the Court, Justice Gorsuch said:
"“To square that expansive theory with the Second Amendment, the government invites us to draw an analogy between its present regulation and historical laws addressing habitual drunkards,” Gorsuch wrote.
Those laws, the government contends, demonstrate a tradition of firearm regulation consistent with its effort to disarm any regular user of any controlled substance without any further showing,” he continued. “But the government’s analogy fails under every measure it asks us to consider.”
A slight chuckle rippled through the courtroom when Gorsuch noted that, if habitual drunkard laws applied to those who drank regularly, two of America’s founders “could have faced trouble.” John Adams was known to drink “a tankard of hard cider” with his breakfast, and some accounts say James Madison “consumed a pint of whiskey daily.”
This is especially welcome here in the Third Circuit where United States v. Harris awaited the Hemani decision. Judge Bibas' opinion found Colonial era laws dispossessing drunks and the mentally insane as an adequate analogy for disarming cannabis consumers. Harris was remanded to develop a record on the mechanics of cannabis impairment, including determining the "half life" of the drug - whatever that means. That Judge Bibas was so nonchalant about analogizing PA's 450,000 MMJ patients with drunkands and the insane was truly frightening.
Between rescheduling for MMJ patients and Hemani cannabis consumers are ever closer to enjoying all of their Constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday the government can’t criminally prosecute a man for possessing a firearm simply because he regularly smoked ma*****na, rejecting the government’s compar…