Theodore C. Levy, Esq., LLM - Philadelphia Trial Attorney

08/20/2026

I asked Google who the best Kalahari lawyer is and this is the result. AI is never wrong!

08/20/2026

Just another day fighting for justice for my injured clients.

07/07/2026

4 months ago I won a $2,400,000 verdict against Kalahari in the Middle District of Pennsylvania in Scranton. Following trial, the defense filed post trial motions and I filed a motion for delay damages. Yesterday, the judge denied the defense’s motion and granted mine. Judgment entered against Kalahari in the amount of $2,775,417.70!!!!!

07/04/2026

Happy 250th birthday America! Let freedom ring!

05/14/2026

Too many lawyers want to settle everything. I promise that when we represent you we will never accept lowball offers!!!

05/05/2026

If you are a PAJ member, please log in today to see me lecture about my 2.4 million dollar verdict!

Join Theodore Levy, Esq., & Partner at Fine, Staud & Levy, for a closer look at a $2.4M slip-and-fall verdict in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. He’ll break down the key decisions, challenges, and takeaways from the trial.

🗓 Tuesday, May 5th
⏰ 2:00 PM
💻 Hosted via Zoom by the Pennsylvania Association of Justice

05/05/2026

Check out Fine Staud and Fine Staud and Levy LLC new website.

We’re excited to share that Fine Staud & Levy has a new and improved website! Check it out: https://fineandstaud.com

It is designed to be more accessible and informative:
- A clear overview of our practice areas and services
- Client testimonials highlighting real experiences and results
- A Spanish-friendly experience for better client accessibility
- Helpful blog posts focused on legal education and common questions
- Easier ways to connect with our team when you need support

04/16/2026

The insurance companies have a "heads I win, tails you lose" mentality. Let me tell you how:

1. If there is minimal damage to the car after a crash, they argue that it is impossible for the Plaintiff to have a serious injury because it is a minor accident. If there is a lot of damage to the vehicle, they will tell you that vehicle damage is not relevant, it's all about what the medical records show.

2. If there are gaps in treatment, they will argue that if the Plaintiff was hurt he would be treating more consistently. If the Plaintiff is very consistent with treatment, they will argue the Plaintiff overtreated to milk the case.

3. If the Plaintiff does keeps working and doing all their life activities and pushes through the pain, they will argue that is proof that the injuries aren't serious. If the Plaintiff stops working and stops doing other activities, they will argue that they are exaggerating their injuries for money.

4. When the Plaintiff does not have any injuries that show up on a diagnostic study, they will argue no injury occurred. When injuries do show up on a diagnostic study, they will argue the injuries are degenerative. When the injuries are clearly acute and they cannot make the degenerative argument, they will argue that the injuries were self limiting and the Plaintiff made a good recovery.

There are many other examples. If you're injured in an accident, hire a good lawyer who can tear these boilerplate arguments to shreds!