The Town Law LLC, 1650 Market Street Suite 3669, Philadelphia, PA (2026)

09/04/2026

Pennsylvania permits hearsay at preliminary hearings—but the Commonwealth cannot build its entire prima facie case on hearsay alone.

At this stage, prosecutors do not have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They must present sufficient evidence that a crime occurred and that the accused committed it.

Rule 542(E) allows qualifying hearsay to be considered and to establish particular elements. Hearsay generally means an out-of-court statement offered to prove what the statement says.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court imposed an important limit in Commonwealth v. McClelland: hearsay alone cannot establish the entire prima facie case.

This does not mean every hearsay statement is excluded. An officer may testify about personal observations, and some statements may fall within an exception or be offered for a non-hearsay purpose. The real question is what evidence supports each material element.

A dismissal at the preliminary-hearing stage may also be without prejudice. The Commonwealth can sometimes refile charges and cure the evidentiary problem at another hearing.

Defense counsel should identify the source of proof for each element, preserve the transcript, make specific objections, and consider whether a pretrial habeas challenge is warranted if the charges are held for court.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

09/04/2026

No serious injury does not necessarily prevent a Pennsylvania aggravated-assault charge.

Section 2702(a)(1) covers both causing serious bodily injury and attempting to cause it. If no serious bodily injury occurred, the Commonwealth must prove that the accused specifically intended to cause that degree of injury and took a substantial step toward doing so.

Courts examine the entire incident. Potentially relevant facts include:

* The force and duration allegedly used;
* Any weapon or other implement;
* Statements made before or during the confrontation;
* The body area allegedly targeted;
* The parties’ comparative size or strength; and
* Whether something interrupted further conduct.

No single circumstance automatically establishes the required intent.

There is also an important distinction between an attempt theory and a completed-injury theory. When serious bodily injury actually results, Section 2702(a)(1) can apply to intentional or knowing conduct—or reckless conduct showing extreme indifference to human life. An attempt, by contrast, requires a conscious objective to cause serious bodily injury.

Preserve video, photographs, medical records, messages, witness information, and evidence bearing on self-defense or how the encounter began.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

09/03/2026

A dismissed Pennsylvania DUI charge does not automatically eliminate a chemical-test refusal suspension.

The criminal prosecution and PennDOT suspension are separate proceedings. The refusal case is a civil licensing matter governed by Pennsylvania’s Implied Consent Law.

To sustain the suspension, PennDOT generally must establish that:

* An officer arrested the driver for DUI with reasonable grounds to believe the driver had driven while impaired;
* The officer requested an authorized chemical test;
* The driver refused; and
* The required suspension warning was given.

That “reasonable grounds” standard is lower than the proof required for a DUI conviction. The criminal charge can therefore be dismissed or result in an acquittal while the civil suspension remains in effect.

The usual suspension is 12 months. It increases to 18 months when the driver has a qualifying prior refusal suspension or DUI sentence. Restoration fees also apply.

An appeal is meaningful: courts can examine the officer’s reasonable grounds, the testing request, the alleged refusal, and the warnings. But PennDOT states that the appeal generally must be filed within 30 days of the mailing date on its notice.

Do not wait for the criminal case to end before addressing the suspension notice.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

09/03/2026

An unloaded firearm secured in a vehicle is not automatically lawful in Pennsylvania.

Section 6106 generally requires a valid license to carry a qualifying firearm anywhere in a vehicle. That can include a firearm in the passenger compartment, center console, bag, secured case, or trunk. The vehicle rule applies independently of whether the firearm was visibly displayed.

Pennsylvania recognizes specific exceptions. Examples include certain unloaded trips to or from target practice, purchase, repair, sale, appraisal, instruction, a new residence, or a vacation home.

The important nuance: unloading and securing the firearm does not create a universal exception. The transportation must actually fit one of the circumstances listed in the statute.

The Commonwealth must also prove that the accused carried the firearm. When it was not found directly on the person, prosecutors may rely on constructive possession—the power and intent to control it. Location, access, control of the vehicle or container, statements, movements, and personal property may all matter. Presence in the vehicle alone does not automatically establish that every occupant carried the gun.

Depending on license eligibility and whether another criminal violation allegedly occurred, the charge may be graded as a first-degree misdemeanor or third-degree felony.

Preserve the license, vehicle information, travel purpose, receipts, range records, and evidence showing who controlled the firearm or container.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

09/02/2026

A Pennsylvania search warrant is not unlimited permission to search anything, anywhere, at any time.

The warrant must particularly identify the place or person to be searched and specifically identify the property or person sought. The supporting affidavit must establish probable cause connecting that evidence to the stated location.

Important details include:

* The authorized place and items;
* The date and time of issuance;
* An ex*****on window of no more than two days; and
* Whether a nighttime search was specifically authorized.

For warrant purposes, “daytime” means 6 a.m. through 10 p.m. A search between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. requires additional reasonable cause.

Digital evidence has an important nuance. Police may seize an authorized device within the warrant’s ex*****on window and review its contents later. That later review must still be consistent with the warrant.

Officers must leave a copy of the warrant and affidavit whether or not they seize anything, except when the affidavit is sealed. When property is taken, they must also leave a receipt and prepare an inventory.

Do not physically obstruct a search. Preserve every document, record the timeline, and note which locations, containers, and devices were examined. Counsel can then evaluate whether the warrant was supported by probable cause and whether its scope was exceeded.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

09/01/2026

Upper Pottsgrove Police Officer Charged With Voluntary Manslaughter in Fatal Shooting of College Student

A Montgomery County police officer is now facing a voluntary manslaughter charge following the fatal shooting of 22-year-old college student Glenwood “Bubba” Pysher IV.

Authorities say Pysher had been out celebrating with friends on August 23 when he mistakenly went to the wrong residence in Upper Pottsgrove Township. Residents reportedly believed someone was attempting to enter their home and called 911.

Upper Pottsgrove Police Cpl. Sean Farrell, 58, was the first officer to arrive.

According to Montgomery County prosecutors, body-camera footage showed Pysher with his hands raised and no weapon as Farrell confronted him. Prosecutors allege Farrell was approximately 17 to 20 feet away and positioned behind a vehicle when he fired, striking Pysher twice in the chest.

District Attorney Kevin Steele announced that investigators concluded Pysher did not present a threat that legally justified deadly force. Prosecutors also noted that Farrell reportedly had less-lethal equipment available, including a Taser.

The case received significant attention after Pysher’s family explained that he had simply become confused and arrived at the wrong home while trying to meet friends.

Pysher was preparing for his senior year at Saint Elizabeth University, where he played college baseball and reportedly hoped to become a teacher and coach.

Farrell has now been charged with voluntary manslaughter. The prosecution follows an investigation by the Montgomery County Detective Bureau, which included review of the officer’s body-worn camera footage.

09/01/2026

A technical probation violation does not automatically authorize a new jail sentence in Pennsylvania.

Act 44 created a presumption against total confinement for technical violations. Incarceration following revocation is permitted only when Section 9771’s requirements are satisfied—for example, after another criminal conviction or when a qualifying technical violation involves a public-safety threat, assaultive conduct, a firearm, drug delivery, absconding, or another specified circumstance.

When confinement is legally authorized on technical grounds:

* First technical violation: maximum 14 days
* Second technical violation: maximum 30 days
* Third or subsequent violation: the court may consider the original sentencing alternatives

Exceptions matter. Up to 30 additional days may be permitted when reasonably necessary for certain evaluations or treatment programs. Some confinement grounds also require proof that less restrictive options cannot safely address the violation.

Revocation still requires a hearing. The defendant must be present with counsel, and the court must find on the record that a condition was violated. An arrest alone is not enough—although the court does not necessarily have to wait for the new criminal case to end.

Preserve reporting records, treatment documentation, employment information, and communications with probation. Those materials may affect both the alleged violation and the appropriate response.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

08/31/2026

Bail in Pennsylvania does not always mean paying cash.

Pennsylvania recognizes several forms of pretrial release:

* ROR: No money is posted.
* Nonmonetary conditions: Reporting, supervision, travel restrictions, treatment, curfews, or no-contact provisions may be imposed.
* Unsecured bail: No upfront deposit, but the defendant may owe a fixed amount after a violation.
* Nominal bail: A small deposit with an approved surety.
* Monetary bail: Cash or authorized security must be posted.

When selecting bail conditions, the court considers factors including employment, finances, family and community ties, criminal history, previous court appearances, and any history of flight.

If monetary bail is imposed, Pennsylvania rules specifically require consideration of the defendant’s financial ability, and the amount must be reasonable. Inability to pay does not automatically guarantee release—but it cannot simply be ignored.

Bail may be denied in constitutionally limited circumstances, including capital or life-imprisonment offenses and cases where no conditions other than detention will reasonably assure public safety. Reasons for refusing bail must be placed in writing or on the record.

Bail can also be modified before verdict through the proper procedure. Supporting documents and a workable release plan may be important.

08/31/2026

A Pennsylvania preliminary hearing is not a trial.

The judge does not decide guilt or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. The Commonwealth must instead establish a prima facie case: evidence that a crime occurred and sufficient grounds to believe the accused committed it.

That is a lower burden than the prosecution faces at trial. The evidence is generally viewed in the Commonwealth’s favor, and the judge ordinarily does not resolve credibility disputes.

If the burden is met, the supported charges are held for court. If only a lesser offense is supported, that offense may be held instead. If no prima facie case is established, the complaint must be dismissed—although dismissal does not always prevent lawful refiling.

Hearsay presents an important nuance.

Rule 542 allows hearsay to establish certain elements, and the rules of evidence are relaxed compared with trial. But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that inadmissible hearsay alone cannot establish the entire prima facie case or the accused’s identity.

The defense may cross-examine witnesses, inspect physical evidence offered at the hearing, present appropriate evidence, and preserve a record. Even when charges are held for court, that testimony may reveal inconsistencies, missing proof, or issues for later motions.

Before waiving a preliminary hearing, understand what evidence and strategic opportunities may be lost.

Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

General information only; every case is different.

08/30/2026

A Pennsylvania traffic stop involves several different legal questions:

* You must provide your license, registration, and insurance information when properly requested.
* You do not have to volunteer a narrative about where you were, what you consumed, or what is inside the vehicle.
* If police request permission to search, you may clearly state: “I do not consent to any searches.” Never physically interfere if officers proceed.
* Do not assume Miranda warnings must be given before ordinary roadside questioning.
* DUI chemical testing is different from a routine search request. Refusing qualifying post-arrest testing can produce a separate license suspension and other consequences.

After the stop, preserve the timeline, the questions asked, the warnings provided, and information about any available video.

Charged after a traffic stop in Pennsylvania? Contact The Town Law LLC at 215-307-5504.

The Town Law LLC

09/04/2026

09/04/2026

09/03/2026

09/03/2026

09/02/2026

09/01/2026

09/01/2026

08/31/2026

08/31/2026

08/30/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request