09/01/2026
π¨A real marriage does not automatically mean an approved case.
These three issues are causing denials right now and most couples have no idea until it is too late.
Swipe to learn moreβ‘οΈ
If entry into the United States was made without inspection meaning crossing without going through an official port of entry and this was not addressed immediately at the start of the adjustment of status case, it will trigger a denial.
Entering without inspection creates a bar to adjustment of status that requires a waiver before the case can move forward. Filing without that waiver or failing to disclose the entry is one of the most common and most preventable causes of marriage-based denial.
USCIS requires extensive documentation proving the marriage is genuine joint bank accounts, shared lease or mortgage, insurance policies, photos together over time, communication records, affidavits from people who know the couple. If the evidence submitted is thin, missing, or not credible and there is no opportunity to cure the deficiency the case will be denied.
A real marriage with weak documentation is treated the same as a fraudulent one at the interview table. The evidence must tell the story clearly before the officer ever asks a single question.
If something was misrepresented on a visa application years ago claiming to be married when there was no marriage, claiming a job that did not exist, overstating ties to a home country to increase approval chances USCIS will find it.
Even if the misrepresentation happened 15 years ago on a B-1 or B-2 tourist visa application, it can and will be used to deny a current marriage-based adjustment of status case. The system cross-references everything. The marriage being real today does not erase what was falsely stated in the past.
If a previous marriage-based adjustment of status case was denied and the officer made a finding or even a suggestion of potential marriage fraud, that finding follows every future immigration case permanently. In a second marriage-based case USCIS will not begin by evaluating the current marriage. They will go directly to the prior marriage and investigate that finding first.
It does not matter how