The Brian Phillips Team, Real Estate In The Big Apple & Beyond

Home
United States
New York, NY
The Brian Phillips Team, Real Estate In The Big Apple & Beyond

Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from The Brian Phillips Team, Real Estate In The Big Apple & Beyond, Estate agents, 575 Madison Avenue 3rd Floor, New York, NY.

🏆 REBNY’s 2025 Agent of the Year | Founder of The Mobile Broker® & The Brian Phillips Team | Serving NYC & beyond in co-ops, condos, townhomes, new development, rentals | Powered by Douglas Elliman New York | Member: REBNY-RLS & OneKey MLS 🏆 REBNY’s 2025 Agent of the Year | 2025 President, NYS Residential Real Estate Council
Welcome to the official page of Brian Phillips—The Mobile Broker® and fou

nder of The Brian Phillips Team at Douglas Elliman. With nearly 30 years of experience as a licensed broker and dual membership in the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) and the Hudson Gateway Association of Realtors (HGAR), I offer clients unparalleled access across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Long Island, and the Hudson Valley. Whether you’re buying, selling, renting, or investing, I’m here to guide you every step of the way with expert market insight, a tech-forward approach, and a deep commitment to your success.

11/24/2025

🚀 AI Is Reshaping the Internet and Google Is Betting Its Future on Reinventing Itself

Google’s rapid shift into generative AI has become one of the most dramatic transformations in the company’s history. After ChatGPT exploded into the mainstream and positioned OpenAI as the name people associated with artificial intelligence, Google had to confront its own complacency. That moment set off a three-year overhaul that changed the company’s culture, product strategy, and internal structure.

At the center of this reinvention is Gemini, the frontier model Google built after merging teams and accelerating research. The arrival of Gemini 3 inside Google Search from day one marks a major turning point. Search has always been Google’s most protected business, so building a new model directly into it signals how fully the company is embracing an AI-first identity.

Google’s real strength is the scale of its ecosystem. The company owns the chips that power its models, the cloud infrastructure companies rely on, and platforms like YouTube, Maps, Android, and Search that reach billions of people. This gives Google a level of distribution and integration that rivals cannot easily match. Its cloud division is growing quickly, demand for its AI hardware is surging, and its research output continues to shape the frontier.

The challenge is protecting the economic engine that built the web. AI Overviews and conversational search give users instant answers, but they reduce the need to click through to websites. Publishers are already worried about declining traffic, and SEO experts warn that an AI-centered search experience may disrupt the entire content ecosystem. Without sustainable value for creators, the web becomes harder to maintain, and even Google’s AI models lose the high-quality information they depend on.

Google argues that overall searches continue to rise and that new tools help users find more relevant content. Analysts expect Google to keep leading the market, even as its share of search advertising gradually declines due to new AI-driven competitors.

What is clear is that generative AI is reshaping how information flows, how media companies survive, and how consumers make decisions. Google is attempting to manage this shift while reinventing itself at the same time. The company has navigated platform changes before, from mobile to cloud, and sees this period as another expansion opportunity. With its global reach, research depth, and control of the technology stack, Google is uniquely positioned to shape what the next era of the internet looks like.

The question now is whether its bold self-disruption will keep it ahead in a world where AI is no longer a feature but the foundation of digital life.

When OpenAI unleashed ChatGPT, it awoke Google from its slumber. As Google now reimagines its business in the age of AI, big questions lie ahead.

11/23/2025

INFOGRAPHIC: ✨ Elevate Your Kitchen Instantly With These Standout Countertops ✨

From ultra-durable sintered stone to bold quartzite, these four options bring serious style and personality to any space.

......

11/23/2025

📉🧨 When key sectors slip in unison, the question isn’t if trouble is coming. It’s how soon.

The latest data paints a picture that feels reassuring on the surface. GDP growth has held above three percent for two consecutive quarters and unemployment remains low by historical standards at 4.4 percent. Yet these broad figures mask a very different reality emerging inside the labor market and across key industries. When you look closely, a number of sectors are showing the kind of early-stage weakening that has often preceded a sharper economic turn.

The labor market is the clearest example of this hidden fragility. Job openings have declined, hiring has slowed, and layoffs have begun to rise from historic lows. Younger workers and Black Americans are feeling these shifts first, a pattern that typically emerges when the labor cycle is beginning to turn. Economists often assume that unemployment rises slowly in a downturn, but history shows that once the tipping point is reached, the shift becomes abrupt. A series of small increases can quickly become a surge as layoffs reinforce a feedback loop of reduced consumer spending and declining business revenue.

Signs of stress are also becoming harder to ignore in industries that play an outsized role in overall employment. Homebuilding is confronting elevated inventories and weakening building permits, leaving builders with more workers than current activity levels can sustain. Commercial real estate investment has declined for six straight quarters and architectural billings remain sluggish, suggesting limited construction ahead even with the growth of AI data centers. Restaurants are reporting softer sales among younger consumers and rising input costs are pressuring margins. Worker efficiency in restaurants has slipped, which suggests that many establishments may be overstaffed and vulnerable to cuts. State and local governments, now stretched thin after the end of pandemic-era funding, are facing difficult decisions that could bring additional job losses.

Beyond these large employment centers, smaller but meaningful sectors are also weakening. Freight activity is down markedly, with fewer goods moving across oceans, rail lines, and highways. Mining and logging companies are scaling back as oil and lumber prices sit below profitable investment levels. Higher education is under pressure from declining enrollment and shrinking budgets, which makes its recent employment stability difficult to sustain. Each of these trends may be modest in isolation but together they add momentum to a broader slowdown.

Consumption has been one of the main supports for the U.S. economy, but that support depends on a labor market capable of generating stable income. If layoffs accelerate in these stressed sectors at a time when hiring remains subdued, the resulting contraction in household spending could pull the economy into a self-reinforcing downturn. Once that dynamic begins, the shift from cooling to contraction can happen faster than consensus expectations allow.

The headline numbers may still look calm, but the underlying story is becoming increasingly difficult to overlook. The combination of weakening sectors, softening labor dynamics, and tightening public budgets suggests that the risks beneath the surface are building. Recognizing these undercurrents now is essential for understanding where the broader economy may be heading next.

From homebuilding to trucking, major parts of the US economy are in deep trouble. The weakness could drag the whole country into a recession.

11/22/2025

🏙️ NYC Is Shifting Fast. Your Home, Your Health, and Your Investments Are Next.

This new edition breaks down two major policy debates reshaping NYC real estate including COPA and the Pied à Terre tax, along with practical guides to healthier living, smarter investing, and creating a home that truly feels good.

📖 Dive into what is changing and how to stay ahead.

4 tricks to turn your home into a space that supports your health.

11/22/2025

🟥🟦 If Maps Can Shift the Balance of Congress, They Can Also Silence Entire Communities.

The Supreme Court has stepped into the latest redistricting fight in Texas, granting a temporary pause that allows the state’s new congressional map to proceed while the justices consider a full appeal.

Justice Samuel Alito’s decision does not signal the final outcome, but it gives Texas space to continue using a map that could award Republicans as many as five additional House seats. With the GOP holding a narrow 219 to 214 majority, even a handful of new seats could influence control of the House in 2026, making this moment far more consequential than a procedural ruling might suggest.

This case is part of a larger national pattern where states are redrawing political maps between Census cycles, an uncommon tactic now becoming a political strategy. Texas acted after direct pressure from President Donald Trump and shortly after other states including Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, and California adopted their own partisan-tilted maps. The lower court that initially blocked the Texas map determined that lawmakers relied on racial considerations rather than political ones, an important distinction because courts grant wide latitude for partisan gerrymandering but little room for race-based redistricting. The judicial panel emphasized that Governor Greg Abbott and state officials appeared to act on a flawed Justice Department letter that incorrectly suggested “coalition districts” of Black and Hispanic voters were unconstitutional. Although the letter itself was riddled with errors, the panel concluded it pushed the legislature to redraw districts based explicitly on racial demographics, which violates constitutional limits.

The decision sits at the intersection of two critical trends. The first is the accelerating erosion of the Voting Rights Act as the Supreme Court signals increasing skepticism toward the use of race in map-drawing, potentially putting long-standing district protections at risk for Black and Hispanic voters. The second is the unavoidable role the Court will play in upcoming elections because redistricting cases move directly from three-judge panels to the Supreme Court, ensuring a steady flow of politically charged disputes as the midterms approach. With candidate filing deadlines weeks away and primaries beginning in March, the timeline adds even more pressure.

Texas’s map reflects years of tension over representation in a rapidly changing state. The judicial panel found substantial evidence that the legislature racially gerrymandered the map and that the process was shaped by both political goals and a misunderstanding of federal law. The Supreme Court’s temporary pause leaves the final outcome uncertain, but the implications are already clear. Redistricting is no longer a once-a-decade recalibration. It has become an ongoing contest over political power and over whose voices will meaningfully shape the future of American elections.

The brief pause on a lower court order will give the high court time to consider an appeal by Texas.

11/21/2025

💳 🦾 Rebuilding your credit takes patience, but you are not shut out.

Here is how to improve your chances of getting a credit card again.

Having bad credit can be worse than having no credit at all. A lousy credit score can lead to a stee...

11/21/2025

🧩📉 Three Big Mortgage Ideas. One Big Problem: None Fix Affordability.

The Trump administration is floating some of the biggest mortgage ideas in decades as it looks for ways to jump-start a housing market frozen by ultralow pandemic-era rates. Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte confirmed that officials are exploring portable mortgages, 50-year mortgages, and even crypto-backed alternatives. Each proposal aims to ease the affordability squeeze that has kept millions of homeowners rooted in place and kept many first-time buyers on the sidelines. With more than 80 percent of homeowners holding mortgage rates below 6 percent, most are reluctant to trade a 2 or 3 percent loan for today’s 6 to 7 percent environment.

Portable mortgages are attracting the most attention because they would allow homeowners to carry their existing mortgage and interest rate to a new property rather than starting over with a higher-rate loan. In theory, this could restore mobility for people who need to move but cannot justify leaving behind a historically low rate. Yet the concept brings significant complications. It would separate the market into those with low-rate mortgages and those without, giving portable-rate buyers a major advantage in bidding wars. That imbalance could put even more upward pressure on prices. The idea also conflicts with the way mortgage-backed securities work, since investors rely on predictable timelines tied to a specific property. If mortgages suddenly become movable, the added uncertainty could lead investors to demand higher returns, and mortgage rates could rise for everyone.

The FHFA is also examining a 50-year mortgage, which lowers monthly payments by stretching the loan term. On a typical home purchase, the reduction can be meaningful, but the long-term cost is enormous. Extending a mortgage from 30 to 50 years means paying more than 80 percent more in total interest and building equity at a much slower pace. Buyers may get short-term relief, but the financial trade-offs accumulate over time and leave homeowners more vulnerable if the market shifts.

Crypto-backed mortgages represent the most unconventional idea under review. These loans allow borrowers to pledge digital assets instead of selling them, similar to how high-net-worth buyers sometimes use stock portfolios as collateral. While this approach may benefit a narrow group of crypto-heavy borrowers, it does little for the broader public. Crypto’s volatility introduces sudden swings in collateral value, raising the risk of margin calls and default. With only a small share of Americans holding significant crypto assets, this option would have almost no impact on overall affordability.

Each of these concepts offers potential benefits for certain types of buyers, but all share the same core limitation. They increase access to credit, yet they do not create more homes. The country’s affordability crisis is rooted in a long-standing supply shortage. When more buyers are empowered to enter the market without a corresponding increase in available housing, prices rise rather than fall. Economists warn that any short-term mobility created by these proposals would be overshadowed by the long-term consequences of higher demand and tight inventory.

Portable mortgages may free homeowners who feel trapped by low rates. Fifty-year mortgages may help some buyers lower their monthly payments. Crypto-backed mortgages may offer liquidity for a small group of affluent borrowers. But none of these ideas meaningfully address the shortage of homes that continues to define the American housing market. Real affordability requires more housing, not just more ways to finance the existing supply.

The FHFA is weighing portable, 50-year, and crypto-backed mortgages. Experts warn they may raise prices instead of making homes more affordable.

11/21/2025

🧨🇺🇸 Normalize calling leaders “traitors,” and you normalize weakening the rule of law.

President Donald Trump ignited a new political firestorm by calling for Democratic lawmakers to be arrested and tried for treason after they released a video reminding U S service members that they are required to refuse unlawful orders. The lawmakers featured in the video have military and intelligence backgrounds, and their message centered on a foundational principle of American civil military relations. Service members swear an oath to the Constitution, not to any individual president, and are obligated to reject manifestly illegal orders under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Trump’s reaction escalated far beyond policy disagreement. On Truth Social he labeled the lawmakers “traitors,” accused them of “seditious behavior at the highest level,” and amplified a message urging that they be hanged. The threats landed at a moment when political rhetoric is increasingly linked to real world safety risks, and Democratic leaders immediately raised concerns about the personal danger these comments could pose. Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer notified Capitol Police about potential threats to the lawmakers involved, while Senator Chris Murphy noted that he is actively reconsidering his own security because of the escalation.

The controversy goes deeper than the exchange itself. It touches on a growing list of legal and ethical questions surrounding recent military actions ordered by the administration. Some service members have already sought guidance about the legality of maritime strikes targeting individuals the administration has labeled narcoterrorists, a classification critics argue lacks clear legal basis. There have also been discussions within the administration about extending such operations into Venezuela, a move that would raise significant legal issues since Venezuelan actors have no known ties to groups authorized under existing military force laws. Other disputes involve the use of U S military pilots in deportation operations and domestic troop deployments that courts have ruled unlawful. These tensions form the backdrop for why lawmakers felt the need to publicly reaffirm the limits of presidential authority over the military.

The Justice Department responded to the video by saying its creators should be “held to account,” although officials declined to confirm whether an investigation is underway. This statement comes amid a broader pattern in which Trump has pushed for investigations into political opponents and critics. Recent examples include the removal of a federal prosecutor who declined to pursue charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James, followed by indictments issued without grand jury review. The U S attorney in Miami is conducting an expansive probe of former national security officials from the Obama administration, and investigations have been opened into other figures Trump has targeted, including former FBI director James Comey, Senator Adam Schiff, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.

These events illustrate a concerning drift in the balance of power between the presidency and the institutions designed to check it. The clash over the video highlights fundamental questions about lawful orders, the independence of the military, and the politicization of federal law enforcement. In condemning Trump’s remarks, Democratic leaders emphasized that threatening death or prosecution for political disagreement crosses a line that a constitutional democracy cannot afford to blur. The broader storyline reveals a political landscape where long standing norms are weakening and the mechanisms that separate personal grievance from official action are increasingly strained. Senator Schumer warned that if a line is not drawn here, there may be no meaningful line left to draw.

The president said lawmakers who appeared in a video committed “seditious behavior” and should be arrested and put on trial for treason.

11/21/2025

🕊️ What if Cheney’s farewell showed just how far today’s GOP has drifted from its past?

Dick Cheney’s funeral at Washington National Cathedral became more than a remembrance of a towering and polarizing figure in American politics. It emerged as a quiet reflection on how deeply the country’s political culture has changed. More than one thousand people filled the cathedral, including two former presidents, four former vice presidents, congressional leaders from both parties, and even President Joe Biden. Their presence summoned an earlier era when bipartisan respect was an expectation of national leadership rather than something spoken of in nostalgia.

Just as telling was who was not there. Neither President Donald Trump nor Vice President JD Vance attended the service. While past presidents gathered in the pews, Trump spent the morning posting accusations of “seditious behavior, punishable by death” against Democratic lawmakers who had recorded a video reminding military members that they are not required to follow illegal orders. The contrast between the solemnity inside the cathedral and the fury online captured the scale of the divide in today’s political landscape.

Cheney’s career reflected the older Republican establishment at its most influential. He became the youngest White House chief of staff at age thirty four, served six terms in Congress, rose to House Republican leadership, and eventually became a wartime defense secretary. As vice president during the Bush administration, he held unparalleled influence over national security decisions in the years after September 11 and openly embraced the “Darth Vader” nickname he had earned for his hard edged approach.

Later in life, Cheney’s image shifted again. Standing publicly with his daughter Liz, he broke with the modern Republican Party after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. He called Donald Trump the greatest threat to the republic in its entire history and endorsed Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Trump responded by mocking Cheney’s record and pairing him with the Democrat he vowed to support.

Cheney’s influence over the shape of presidential power was also part of his legacy. He spent decades arguing that reforms after Watergate placed too many limits on the executive branch. He believed in expanding presidential authority. What he likely did not imagine was how a president with Trump’s instincts would take those expanded powers to unprecedented levels.

None of this was mentioned at the funeral. Instead, Cheney was remembered as a devoted grandfather and a man who loved the outdoors. Liz Cheney told mourners that her father believed party loyalty must always yield to the Constitution. She also revealed that Cheney’s earliest inspiration for public service came from John F. Kennedy, whose speech at the University of Wyoming first moved him toward government long before he entered Republican politics.

The audience reflected a political world that has largely disappeared. Former presidents, former vice presidents, senior lawmakers of both parties, prominent Republicans from the Bush era, members of the January 6 Committee, and even Rachel Maddow attended the service. Their presence conveyed a momentary return to a political culture shaped by institutional respect and shared civic expectations.

George W. Bush spoke during the service and praised Cheney’s steadiness, judgment, and humility. He said Cheney’s talent and restraint exceeded his ego, a quality that feels increasingly rare in today’s political climate.

Cheney’s funeral became a quiet commentary on the current state of American politics. It evoked a time when public service carried a sense of seriousness and bipartisan respect. In today’s Washington, where division, spectacle, and zero sum conflict often overshadow governance, the service felt like both a farewell to a political figure and a reminder of a political era that continues to slip further out of reach.

Those sitting in the pews summoned images of a bygone era when raw partisanship was not what defined leadership.

11/21/2025

📱🏛️ A major fight between Zillow and Compass is unfolding in a Manhattan courtroom.

Real estate’s most consequential fight is unfolding in Manhattan, where Compass and Zillow are arguing over a policy that could reshape who gets to see which homes hit the market. What may look like a dispute between two industry giants is really a debate about transparency, consumer access and the future of online search.

Private listings are homes marketed to a select group of agents and clients instead of being shared widely through MLS platforms and major search sites. Zillow’s listing access policy blocks any home from appearing on Zillow if it was first marketed privately. Zillow says this protects equal access for buyers and prevents information from being hidden. Compass argues that Zillow is using its enormous influence to force brokerages into a single way of doing business and to limit how sellers can choose to market their homes.

The courtroom testimony has been intense. Compass CEO Robert Reffkin told the judge that agents feel bullied by the ban and that sellers deserve the ability to test their home privately without platforms dictating their choices. Zillow’s legal team countered by presenting internal Compass emails suggesting that Compass executives have minimized Zillow’s importance in private conversations. Zillow also emphasized that once a listing is removed from its platform, it can still appear on many other real estate sites.

This fight comes as Zillow faces a series of lawsuits over its Premier Agent program, mortgage practices and alleged steering. One recent complaint says buyers were steered toward Zillow Home Loans through incentives that were not clearly disclosed. Other cases argue that these programs may violate federal consumer protection laws.

At the same time, Zillow is highlighting research that raises fair housing concerns about private listings. A recent analysis in Chicago found that homes marketed privately were more than twice as likely to be in majority white neighborhoods. Zillow calls this a form of digital redlining that restricts access to opportunity and threatens progress toward fair housing. Compass and other brokerages reject that interpretation and say private listings offer flexibility to sellers in sensitive situations while reflecting long-standing practices in certain market segments.

MLS organizations like MRED are defending their own private listing networks, saying these tools allow families to navigate personal circumstances without fear of penalties. Their position now directly conflicts with Zillow’s view that anything short of broad exposure ultimately harms buyers and increases inequity.

Inside the courtroom, both companies are positioning themselves as defenders of the consumer. Compass says Zillow’s rules punish rivals and constrain seller choice. Zillow says it is preventing hidden inventory and protecting the principle that all buyers should have equal access to available homes. The judge must now decide whether Zillow can enforce its policy while the larger lawsuit proceeds. Her ruling will influence how brokerages market homes, how platforms display listings and how easily buyers can understand what is truly for sale.

In a market already stressed by low supply, high prices and widening inequality, this case raises a deeper question. Will the future of home shopping remain open and transparent, or will it become a maze of separate platforms where buyers must check multiple sites just to find available homes. The answer will shape how accessible and equitable the home search experience is for millions of Americans.

Compass and Zillow are sparring in a NYC courtroom. The issue? The "Zillow Ban," which the CEO of Compass says has left his agents feeling "bullied."

11/20/2025

🗽🏛️ What Happens When a Mayor-Elect Who Ran Against Trump Walks Into the Oval Office?

A politically charged meeting is happening on Friday, and the power dynamics, policy consequences, and risks for New York could not be clearer.

Zohran Mamdani, New York City’s mayor-elect, will meet President Trump at the White House on Friday at a time when federal policy choices have already reshaped conditions on the ground in New York. This is not a meeting built on goodwill or shared priorities. It is happening after months of hostility and in the shadow of federal actions that have produced measurable consequences for working-class, Black, and Brown communities.

Trump’s record toward New York City is central to understanding the dynamics at play. Since returning to office, his administration has pushed for aggressive immigration enforcement, threatened federal funding cuts to the city, revived plans to deploy the National Guard, and advanced policies that have disproportionately harmed lower-income households. Nationally, the administration has backed mass deportation proposals that independent analyses estimate would remove more than 11 million people, including more than 4.4 million workers who keep essential sectors operating. The Migration Policy Institute projects that removing this workforce could shrink the U.S. GDP by 5.7 percent over a decade.

Trump’s actions on healthcare add another layer of concern. Federal efforts to reduce Affordable Care Act premium subsidies would directly affect millions of low and moderate income households. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, nearly 15 million Americans rely on ACA marketplace coverage and about 87 percent receive subsidies that make premiums affordable. Cutting those subsidies would raise premiums by an average of 45 percent, with the steepest impacts on Black and Latino families who are disproportionately represented in ACA plans. New York would feel this acutely. More than 260,000 residents depend on ACA coverage and any subsidy reduction would compound the city’s already high cost of living.

This broader context makes Friday’s meeting especially fraught. Mamdani campaigned on confronting Trump and positioned himself as a counterweight to federal policy. His language throughout the race was sharply pointed and aimed at energizing his base. On election night he challenged Trump by telling him to “turn the volume up” and later declared, “To get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us.” These lines captured the intensity of the moment and made clear how little room either side left for early cooperation.

It remains to be seen whether Mamdani’s decision to seek this meeting reflects strategic pragmatism or early positioning for the conflicts ahead. His incoming administration has centered affordability as its primary theme, yet the scale of New York’s affordability crisis far exceeds the authority of City Hall. More than half of New York renters are rent-burdened according to the latest NYC Housing and Vacancy Survey, and grocery prices in the region have risen nearly 24 percent since 2020. These pressures are real, but meaningful relief depends heavily on federal economic policy. Many of the administration’s decisions to date have worked against the interests of the same working-class households Mamdani says he intends to support.

The meeting also arrives as Mamdani and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch urge Trump not to deploy the National Guard in New York, a step the administration has already taken in several cities. Earlier this week Mamdani appeared with Tisch at a police memorial as she agreed to remain in her role, signaling continuity in a moment when federal intervention remains an active possibility.

Although Mamdani’s team has characterized the trip as a standard courtesy for an incoming mayor, the political reality is far more complex. Conflicting agendas, sharpened public statements, and fundamentally different governing philosophies will shape the conversation. Public safety, economic stability, and the affordability agenda backed by more than one million New Yorkers are expected to guide the discussion, but the deeper tensions driving this encounter will remain.

Despite months of antagonism, it was Mamdani who requested the meeting, a decision that raises questions about strategy, timing, and the limits of mayoral power when federal authority has already delivered significant consequences for vulnerable communities.

What happens on Friday may offer the earliest indication of how New York City and Washington will navigate a federal administration whose policies have already produced deep and measurable impacts on the groups the city is trying to protect. It will also show whether Mamdani intends to soften his confrontational stance or maintain it as he enters office.

The meeting between Zohran Mamdani, the mayor-elect of New York City, and President Trump will come after the two men have fiercely attacked one another.

Address

575 Madison Avenue 3rd Floor
New York, NY
10022

Website

https://linktr.ee/themobilebroker?subscribe, https://www.elliman.com/team/the-brian-phillips-team/226111

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Brian Phillips Team, Real Estate In The Big Apple & Beyond posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Brian Phillips Team, Real Estate In The Big Apple & Beyond:

Featured

The Law Office of Richard M. Kenny
363 7th Avenue 16th Floor

Want your business to be the top-listed Law Practice in New York?

The Brian Phillips Team, Real Estate In The Big Apple & Beyond

11/24/2025

11/23/2025

11/23/2025

11/22/2025

11/22/2025

11/21/2025

11/21/2025

11/21/2025

11/21/2025

11/21/2025

11/20/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Featured

Share

Category