Law Firm of Farhan Aryan P.C.

06/04/2026

06/03/2026

Federal Judge Orders Relief in 75-Country Visa Suspension Case, Raising New Questions About Policy Legality

Important Immigration Litigation Update

A federal judge in Massachusetts has issued a preliminary injunction in a case challenging the suspension of immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries.

In Ullah v. LaFave, decided on June 2, 2026, the court ordered that the visa suspension not be applied to the plaintiff's immigrant visa application and found that the plaintiffs have a strong likelihood of success on key legal arguments.

The ruling is significant because the court viewed the suspension as a final government action that can be reviewed by federal courts and questioned whether a blanket nationality-based suspension is consistent with federal immigration law.

The decision has already been submitted to the federal court in New York in the pending CLINIC v. Rubio litigation, where plaintiffs are seeking broader relief against the policy.

While this ruling does not automatically lift the suspension for everyone, it represents an important development and may influence other courts reviewing similar challenges.

Affected immigrant visa applicants should continue monitoring developments closely, as additional court decisions may have a significant impact on visa processing.

Farhan A***n Esq.
Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law, State of New York and Federal District Courts

Law Firm of Farhan A***n P.C.
72-35 Broadway, Office #213
Jackson Heights, NY 11372
Call: +1 (844) 343-2529 ext. 101
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aryanlawfirm.com

***n ***nEsq

06/03/2026

Federal Judge Orders Relief in 75-Country Visa Suspension Case, Raising New Questions About Policy Legality

Important Immigration Litigation Update

A federal judge in Massachusetts has issued a preliminary injunction in a case challenging the suspension of immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries.

In Ullah v. LaFave, decided on June 2, 2026, the court ordered that the visa suspension not be applied to the plaintiff's immigrant visa application and found that the plaintiffs have a strong likelihood of success on key legal arguments.

The ruling is significant because the court viewed the suspension as a final government action that can be reviewed by federal courts and questioned whether a blanket nationality-based suspension is consistent with federal immigration law.

The decision has already been submitted to the federal court in New York in the pending CLINIC v. Rubio litigation, where plaintiffs are seeking broader relief against the policy.

While this ruling does not automatically lift the suspension for everyone, it represents an important development and may influence other courts reviewing similar challenges.

Affected immigrant visa applicants should continue monitoring developments closely, as additional court decisions may have a significant impact on visa processing.

Farhan A***n Esq.
Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law, State of New York and Federal District Courts

Law Firm of Farhan A***n P.C.
72-35 Broadway, Office #213
Jackson Heights, NY 11372
Call: +1 (844) 343-2529 ext. 101
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aryanlawfirm.com

06/03/2026

BIA Issues Important Bond Decision

The Board of Immigration Appeals has designated Matter of Martinez-Rodriguez, 29 I&N Dec. 656 (BIA 2026), as a precedential decision.

The BIA held that a respondent's conviction for false imprisonment, along with arrests on other charges, demonstrated that he posed a danger to the community and did not warrant release on immigration bond.

This decision reinforces that the burden is on the respondent to prove that he is not a danger to the community when seeking release from detention.

Criminal history remains a critical factor in immigration bond proceedings.

Farhan A***n Esq.
Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law
State of New York and Federal District Courts

Law Firm of Farhan A***n P.C.

Justice Above All
***n

06/03/2026

BIA Issues Important Precedent Decision on Cancellation of Removal

The Board of Immigration Appeals has designated Matter of Germain, 29 I&N Dec. 648 (BIA 2026) as a precedential decision.

The BIA held that an individual's criminal history, including conduct that did not result in a conviction, and a failure to accept responsibility for criminal acts may outweigh favorable factors when seeking Cancellation of Removal.

This decision reinforces that Cancellation of Removal is a discretionary form of relief, and immigration courts will closely examine both positive and negative factors before granting relief.

If you are facing removal proceedings, experienced legal representation is critical.

Farhan A***n Esq.
Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law
State of New York and Federal District Courts

Law Firm of Farhan A***n P.C.

***n

06/03/2026

This new precedential decision, Matter of Richards, stands for an important discretionary principle in cancellation of removal cases:

Holding:
An applicant's lack of candor or dishonesty regarding their criminal history is a significant adverse factor when an Immigration Judge exercises discretion on an application for cancellation of removal.

Key Takeaways

Even if a lawful permanent resident is statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a), relief can still be denied as a matter of discretion.

Immigration Judges evaluate both favorable and unfavorable factors.

Providing inaccurate, incomplete, misleading, or false information about prior arrests, convictions, or criminal conduct can weigh heavily against a grant of relief.

The BIA emphasized that honesty and credibility are critical considerations when seeking discretionary immigration benefits.

Facts of the Case

Respondent was a lawful permanent resident since 1992.

Convicted in Texas in 2009 for ma*****na possession.

In 2025, upon returning to the United States, he was charged as inadmissible under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) for a controlled substance conviction.

He sought cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a).

The Immigration Judge denied relief in the exercise of discretion, and the BIA affirmed.

Practice Pointer

For practitioners handling cancellation cases, this decision underscores the importance of:

Thoroughly reviewing a client's criminal history before testimony.

Ensuring all applications accurately disclose arrests and convictions.

Correcting any prior inconsistencies before the merits hearing.

Preparing clients carefully regarding testimony about past criminal conduct.

A strong equities case can be significantly undermined if the Immigration Judge concludes the respondent was not truthful about their criminal history.

06/03/2026

Immigration Update: Matter of N-A-G-C- (BIA June 2, 2026)

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that a prior Unaccompanied Alien Child (UAC) designation or an approved Special Immigrant Juvenile (SIJ) petition does not give an Immigration Judge authority to grant bond to a noncitizen who entered the United States without admission or parole.

The BIA ruled that individuals who have not been formally admitted remain “applicants for admission” under INA §235 and are subject to mandatory detention provisions, even if they previously held UAC status or have an approved SIJ petition.

As a result, the Immigration Judge’s bond order was vacated, and the respondent was ordered detained without bond.

This decision may have significant consequences for SIJ beneficiaries and former UACs seeking release from immigration detention while their cases remain pending.

06/03/2026

Major Immigration Update: New Gold Card Pathway to U.S. Permanent Residence Now Available

Create a heading for the FB post:

USCIS and the Department of Homeland Security have introduced new Classes of Admission (COAs) for the Gold Card Program, creating a new pathway to lawful permanent residence for qualifying investors and their immediate family members.

The Gold Card Program is available to individuals who make a qualifying unrestricted gift to the U.S. Department of Commerce, or whose gift is made through a sponsoring corporation or similar entity.

A total of 16 new immigration categories have been created for principal applicants, spouses, and children under both first-preference and second-preference employment-based immigrant classifications, including applicants processing through consular processing and adjustment of status.

Individuals approved under these categories may receive:
• Form I-551 Permanent Resident Card (Gold Card)
• Temporary I-551 stamps
• Immigrant visas evidencing lawful permanent resident status

USCIS SAVE has also been updated to recognize these new categories and verify employment authorization and lawful permanent resident status.

If you have questions about the Gold Card Program, employment-based immigration options, or permanent residence eligibility, consult with an experienced immigration attorney to evaluate your case.

Farhan A***n Esq.
Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law
State of New York and Federal District Courts

Law Firm of Farhan A***n P.C.
72-35 Broadway, Office #213
Jackson Heights, NY 11372

Call: (844) 343-2529 Ext. 101
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aryanlawfirm.com

EmploymentBasedImmigration InvestorVisa PermanentResident AdjustmentOfStatus ImmigrationAttorney FarhanA***n A***nLawFirm

06/03/2026

Major Immigration Update: New Gold Card Pathway to U.S. Permanent Residence Now Available

USCIS and the Department of Homeland Security have introduced new Classes of Admission (COAs) for the Gold Card Program, creating a new pathway to lawful permanent residence for qualifying investors and their immediate family members.

The Gold Card Program is available to individuals who make a qualifying unrestricted gift to the U.S. Department of Commerce, or whose gift is made through a sponsoring corporation or similar entity.

A total of 16 new immigration categories have been created for principal applicants, spouses, and children under both first-preference and second-preference employment-based immigrant classifications, including applicants processing through consular processing and adjustment of status.

Individuals approved under these categories may receive:
• Form I-551 Permanent Resident Card (Gold Card)
• Temporary I-551 stamps
• Immigrant visas evidencing lawful permanent resident status

USCIS SAVE has also been updated to recognize these new categories and verify employment authorization and lawful permanent resident status.

If you have questions about the Gold Card Program, employment-based immigration options, or permanent residence eligibility, consult with an experienced immigration attorney to evaluate your case.

Farhan A***n Esq.
Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law
State of New York and Federal District Courts

Law Firm of Farhan A***n P.C.
72-35 Broadway, Office #213
Jackson Heights, NY 11372

Call: (844) 343-2529 Ext. 101
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.aryanlawfirm.com

***n ***nLawFirm