Andry Law Group

Directions Website Contact the business

Andry Law Group Class Action Litigation, Mass Tort Litigation, Environmental Law, Personal Injury Litigation Since the early 1990s, Mr. Mr. BellSouth Mobility, Judy Abrusely v.

Andry has been extensively involved in complex class action and multi-district litigation. Andry served as lead counsel in numerous multistate/national class actions, which include Sutton Steel v. Centennial Cellular Communications, and Zyra Sonnier v. Radiofone. Andry successfully represented the Attorney General for the State of Louisiana in Ieyoub ex rel. Louisiana v. American To***co Company. Also, notably, he was one of principal organizers of the class action suit filed against the United States Army Corps of Engineers, one of the only suits filed against that entity in which a verdict was rendered in favor of the Plaintiffs. Andry is presently serving as a member of the Plaintiff’s Steering Committee for the MRGO portion of In Re: Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation. In 1994, Mr. Andry experienced firsthand how important an attorney’s ethical obligations are to ensure fundamental fairness in the judicial process. During that time period, Mr. Andry represented one of the co-owners in a suit against Fina Oil and Chemical Company pertaining to land contamination that resulted from the disposal of hazardous paint waste. During the course of the litigation, Fina’s lead counsel was cited for contempt for the destruction of environmental audit documents sought by plaintiffs during discovery. Not only did the judge bar lead counsel from this case and notify the state bar association, criminal contempt proceedings were undertaken as well. This experience, as well as many others in his career, has prompted Mr. Andry to speak at seminars about the importance of an attorney’s ethical obligations.

19 years ago today, Hurricane Katrina made landfall and destroyed St. Bernard Parish and the lower 9nth ward in New Orle...
08/29/2024

19 years ago today, Hurricane Katrina made landfall and destroyed St. Bernard Parish and the lower 9nth ward in New Orleans. The devastation is best evidenced by the fact that only four of the approximately 26,000 structures in the Parish did not flood. The massive devastation was caused by the Corps handling of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet which became a storm surge super highway.

A group of brave residents sued the Corps of Engineers. After a 29 day trial, the US Federal District Court Judge held that the Corps was liable for damages because it was "malfeasant" and "monumentally negligent" with regard to its handling of the MRGO. The trial court's decision was originally affirmed by the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal.

In its original decision, the appellate court held that the Corps was not immune because it had offered little evidence on a particular point at issue. THEN, on rehearing the same three judges held that the Corps was immune. The only difference between the two opinions is that the "little evidence" in the first, conspicuously became "ample evidence" in their second opinion.

Address

610 Baronne Street
New Orleans, LA
70113

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Andry Law Group posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Andry Law Group:

Shortcuts

Share