06/18/2026
The federal government just proposed requiring every federal employee to sign an NDA, and some employment law experts are not happy.
The Office of Personnel Management has proposed a nondisclosure agreement that would bar all federal workers from sharing internal agency operations, personnel matters, pre-decisional documents, and any "sensitive or deliberative material", and would require employees to report colleagues they suspect of doing the same.
Even if you are not in the federal workforce, here's why this matters:
๐น Experts warn the NDA's language is "over-broad" and risks chilling employees' First Amendment rights and protected whistleblower activity
๐น Although the draft NDA claims to preserve Whistleblower Protection Act rights, legal experts describe those carve-outs as lip service given how often internal reporting channels prove ineffective
๐น Combined with OPM's new power to make governmentwide suitability determinations, a violation could result in termination and a five-year bar from federal employment, with no MSPB oversight
This case is a powerful reminder that NDAs, in any workplace, must be carefully drafted to avoid running afoul of employees' legal rights. Overly broad confidentiality agreements create real legal exposure for employers.
The link to the proposal published in the Federal Register is linked below.๐ [Link in first comment]