04/22/2019
This article caught my eye because, unfortunately, we see exploitation of the elderly so often here in Florida. Many times, it is difficult to know whether a person placed in a position as a fiduciary for an older person is a Good Samaritan just trying to help the person out, or if their motive is more selfish - for their own pecuniary gain. The court in a criminal proceeding has to consider circumstantial evidence to determine the intent of the fiduciary.
In this case, the alleged "exploiter" was a neighbor of the elderly person who used her Power of Attorney to withdraw money from the elderly neighborâs bank account and deposit some of it into her own account. She also used her POA to name her own daughter as the Payable on Death Beneficiary of the elderly person's bank accounts. In the criminal case against her, the mere fact that money belonging to the elderly person ended up benefitting the neighbor was used by the State as evidence against her â to show that her intent was to exploit the victim for her own benefit.
Of course, the standard for the State to obtain a criminal conviction of someone accused of exploitation of the elderly is higher than the standard in a civil case against the wrongdoer. When a person in a fiduciary capacity over an elderly person ends up benefiting from that elderly personâs estate, the family of the elderly person typically has a good case against that person for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or undue influence, and will likely be successful in getting the money returned to the elderly personâs estate.
Johnson v. State, â So.3d â-, 2019 WL 1053155 (4th DCA March 06, 2019) The bread and butter work of most probate litigators includes breach of fiduciary