Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, P.C.

Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, P.C. Securities Fraud Lawyers representing investors against financial advisors in FINRA arbitration

Securities Fraud Law Firm representing investors in FINRA Arbitrations against financial advisors and firms for claims of fraud, suitability, churning, breach of fiduciary duty, theft, ponzi schemes, and malpractice.

SEC Charges Firms Regarding Sales of Volatility Linked ETFsThe U.S. Securities Exchange Commission charged multiple Inve...
12/11/2020

SEC Charges Firms Regarding Sales of Volatility Linked ETFs

The U.S. Securities Exchange Commission charged multiple Investment Advisory Firms and Broker-Dealers with unsuitable sales of exchange traded products to their customers.

According to the SEC Press Release, the firms recommended the purchase and holding of these products, despite the fact that the products were only supposed to track the short term volatility in the market, and would likely decline if held long term.

The exchange traded funds (ETFs), attempted to track the short term volatility expectations of the market. Examples referenced in the SEC Orders were iPath S&P 500 VIX Short–Term Futures ETN (“VXX”), Velocity Shares Daily Inverse VIX Short Term ETNs linked to the S&P 500, VIX Short-Term Futures Index (“XIV”), and another volatility-linked security called the ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (“VIXY”).

The firms that reached a settlement of the SEC charges were American Portfolios Financial Services/American Portfolios Advisors Inc., Benjamin F. Edwards & Company Inc., Royal Alliance Associates Inc., Securities America Advisors Inc., and Summit Financial Group Inc.

The SEC also alleged that the firms failed to implement written policies and procedures to prevent violation of the Investment Advisers Act and its Rules, and several firms failed to supervise their representatives.

FINRA securities firms and Investment Advisory firms have duties to supervise their financial advisors, and implement reasonable supervisory systems to detect and prevent unsuitable sales and recommendations. Such firms can be held liable in FINRA arbitrations and other forums for the wrongful acts of their agents, and for their failures to supervise. If you were sold unsuitable ETFs, or were the victim of other wrongful activity relating to investments, and you would like to discuss your potential claims for free with an attorney, please contact W. Scott Greco at Greco & Greco, P.C. W. Scott Greco has decades of experience recovering monies lost through the wrongful acts of financial advisors.

www.grecogrecolaw.com

Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, highly experienced in stock broker fraud. Arbitration and Litigation, free consultation, based in Virginia and DC area.

A FINRA Securities Firm's Failure to Supervise - A Case StudyFINRA recently issued a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Co...
10/30/2020

A FINRA Securities Firm's Failure to Supervise - A Case Study
FINRA recently issued a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC which provides an instructive case study on how FINRA securities firms should and should not carry out their supervisory duties over their financial advisors and customer accounts.

As discussed in the AWC here, from 2012 to 2017 one of Morgan Stanley's representatives carried out hundreds of short term trades in corporate bonds and preferred securities in the accounts of ten customers. The AWC states that due to these investments’ upfront sales charges, they were typically only suitable for customers if held long term.

FINRA Rule 3110 requires that firms such as Morgan Stanley must take "reasonable steps" to ensure that their representative's activities comply with securities laws and regulations. This includes investigating red flags of potential misconduct, and taking action where necessary.

Many firms, similar to Morgan Stanley, have automated systems to raise red flags when certain criteria are met - such as the turnover in customer accounts from the buys and sells of securities. Churning, which is also known as quantitative suitability, involves unsuitable high turnover trading in an account to typically generate commissions for the broker.

Although Morgan Stanley's system correctly identified the red flag and potential problems of this turnover with nearly one hundred alerts / red flags, the problem according to FINRA was what they did or did not do with this information.

According to the AWC, Morgan Stanley discussed the alerts with the broker and contacted customers. However, when contacting the customers, it does not appear they advised the customers of the unsuitable churning, but instead did what many firms do - they asked whether the customer was "satisfied with KG and his recommendations."

The Morgan Stanley compliance department then conducted a review and concluded that the high turnover trading was costing the clients more money than they were making, but still the firm did not take sufficient action to halt the trading, and the high turnover and alerts continued. Clearly Morgan Stanley had a system in place to identify red flags, but it chose not to take action to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, in contravention of Rule 3110.

The AWC states that the activity in the accounts lost $900,000 in ten customers' accounts. FINRA Ordered Morgan Stanley to pay a fine of $175,000 and $774,574 to the eight customers that had not settled their claims.

If you believe that your financial advisor, broker, or advisory firm has churned your account, traded in unsuitable securities, or the firm has failed to supervise your broker, please contact W. Scott Greco for a free attorney consultation at https://www.grecogrecolaw.com/

About Securities ArbitrationIn binding arbitration, the parties present evidence to an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrat...
08/28/2020

About Securities Arbitration
In binding arbitration, the parties present evidence to an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators and agree to abide by the decision of the arbitrator(s) regarding the dispute. Ideally, settling disputes by arbitration is faster and less complicated and time-consuming than going to court.

Arbitration is a means of resolving disputes between parties outside of court. In binding arbitration, the parties present evidence to an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators and agree to abide by the decision of the arbitrator(s) regarding the dispute. Ideally, settling disputes by arbitration is faster and less complicated and time-consuming than going to court. As follows are some common questions many investors have about arbitration:

A. Do I have to submit my claims against a broker or brokerage firm to arbitration?
Most securities brokerage firms and financial advisors have a mandatory arbitration provision included in their new account agreements. If you signed the new account agreement and do not have a defense to the enforceability of the agreement, you more than likely have to arbitrate any claims you may have arising out of the agreement. Should you file a claim in court anyway, the brokerage firm may request the court to send your case to arbitration.

If your dispute is with a FINRA brokerage firm (Broker-Dealer) or broker (registered representative), you most likely will have to arbitrate through FINRA’s Dispute Resolution system. Additionally, FINRA Rules require member brokerage firms to arbitrate disputes with customers on the request of the customer if certain requirements are met (FINRA Rule 12200).

Mandatory arbitration clauses with registered investment advisors may require AAA arbitration, FINRA arbitration, or arbitration in another forum.

B. What are some advantages and disadvantages to arbitration?
The amount of pre-trial discovery of information is more limited in arbitration. For example, depositions, which can be costly and time-consuming, are generally not allowed in arbitration except in certain circumstances. Interrogatories and Requests for Admission are also not allowed by FINRA Rules. This can be an advantage or a disadvantage depending on whether you need additional information from the opposing side to make your case stronger. The rules of evidence in arbitrations are often more relaxed than in court. This allows parties to put in testimony and documentation that may not normally be admissible in court. Once again, this can be an advantage or a disadvantage. Arbitrations also offer very little rights of appeal. Once the award is made, the losing party has a difficult burden if he/she wants to attempt to vacate or overturn that award.

C. Who makes the final decision in arbitration?
Unlike in court, arbitrations are not decided by either judges or juries. Under FINRA arbitration rules, customers may now request that their arbitration panel be composed of three public arbitrators. (Previously, one industry arbitrator was mandatory for three arbitrator panels). FINRA public arbitrators will often be attorneys or other local business persons. Three arbitrator panels are required by FINRA for claims over $100,000.00. After hearing the evidence and arguments in a case, the three arbitrators will announce their decision by filing a written award.

D. Do I need a lawyer for arbitration?
Although you are not required to be represented by a lawyer in arbitration, it is always advisable to have one. Brokerage firms will almost always be represented by a lawyer at the hearing, and an investor representing himself/herself may not present all of the relevant evidence or arguments needed to win a case. Unlike in court, in almost all arbitration venues, your attorney does not have to be admitted to the bar of the state where the hearing takes place. Greco & Greco (www.grecogrecolaw.com) represents investors across the country and generally represents investors on a contingency fee basis so that clients do not have to pay any up-front attorneys fees.

E. Where are arbitration hearings held?
FINRA has hearing locations for arbitrations in every state. They typically will hold the in-person arbitration hearing in the closest hearing location in the state of the customer’s residence during the time of the dispute. Below is a list of the hearing location cities for each state:

Northeast Region

Hearings Locations:

Albany, New York; Augusta, Maine; Boston, Massachusetts; Buffalo, New York; Hartford, Connecticut; London, England; Manchester, New Hampshire; Montpelier, Vermont; New York, New York; Newark, New Jersey; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Providence, Rhode Island; Syracuse New York; Wilmington, Delaware

Western Region

Hearings Locations:

Albuquerque, New Mexico; Anchorage, Alaska; Boise, Idaho; Cheyenne, Wyoming; Denver, Colorado; Helena, Montana; Honolulu, Hawaii; Las Vegas, Nevada; Los Angeles, California; Phoenix, Arizona; Portland, Oregon; Reno, Nevada; Salt Lake City, Utah; San Diego, California; San Francisco, California; Seattle, Washington

Southeast Region

Hearings Locations:

Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Birmingham, Alabama; Boca Raton, Florida; Charlotte, North Carolina; Columbia, South Carolina; Jackson, Mississippi; Jacksonville, Florida; Little Rock, Arkansas; Memphis, Tennessee; Nashville, Tennessee; New Orleans, Louisiana; Norfolk, Virginia; Orlando, Florida; Raleigh, North Carolina; Richmond, Virginia; San Juan, Puerto Rico; Tampa, Florida; Washington, DC

Midwest Region

Hearings Locations:

Bismarck, North Dakota; Charleston, West Virginia; Chicago, Illinois; Cincinnati, Ohio; Cleveland, Ohio; Columbus, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Des Moines, Iowa; Detroit, Michigan; Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Indiana; Kansas City, Missouri; Louisville, Kentucky; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Omaha, Nebraska; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Rapid City, South Dakota; St. Louis, Missouri; Wichita, Kansas
www.grecogrecolaw.com

Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, highly experienced in stock broker fraud. Arbitration and Litigation, free consultation, based in Virginia and DC area.

07/22/2020

Virginia Morgan Stanley Broker Charged With Stealing Millions
The SEC and federal prosecutors recently charged a McLean, Virginia based Morgan Stanley financial advisor with stealing millions of dollars from his customers from 2007 to 2019 when his fraud was discovered. The SEC Complaint against the broker, Michael Barry Carter (also known as "Mike Carter"), can be found athttps://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2020/comp-pr2020-158.pdf
The SEC alleged that Michael Carter stole approximately $6 million by various means, including falsifying internal forms and wire transfers, providing fake account statements, using false email addresses, and making misrepresentations to his customers.
According to the SEC, Mr. Carter has plead guilty to related federal criminal charges.
Securities firms such as Morgan Stanley have duties to supervise their registered representatives such as Mr. Carter, and implement reasonable supervisory systems to detect and prevent fraudulent activity. Such firms can be held liable in FINRA arbitrations for the fraudulent acts of their agents, and for their failures to supervise. If you were a victim of Mr. Carter, or any other fraudulent scheme relating to investments, and you would like to discuss your potential claims for free with an attorney, please contact W. Scott Greco at Greco & Greco, P.C. here: https://www.grecogrecolaw.com/contact
W. Scott Greco has decades of experience recovering stolen funds on behalf of investors.

Greco & Greco Wins Third FINRA Arbitration Award Against UBS of Puerto RicoA FINRA arbitration panel issued an award of ...
02/26/2018

Greco & Greco Wins Third FINRA Arbitration Award Against UBS of Puerto Rico
A FINRA arbitration panel issued an award of damages to Greco & Greco clients against UBS of Puerto Rico on February 23, 2018. The arbitration involved multiple Puerto Rico customers of UBS who had been invested primarily in UBS Puerto Rico Closed End Mutual Funds and Puerto Rico Bonds.
The award, totaling $521,075.00 in damages, was significant because most of the damages were incurred in investments that UBS claimed were conservative (the Puerto Rico AAA Portfolio Bond Fund and COFINA bonds), and UBS further unsuccessfully claimed that the customers had not lost any money because of the interest/dividends they had earned over the years in the investments.
As set out in more detail at Greco & Greco’s website (http://www.securities-lawyers.net/ubs-puerto-rico) the UBS Puerto Rico Closed End Funds (CEFs) were high risk investments which used leverage (a speculative investment technique) and which did not have a market (they were traded by UBS’s trading desk but UBS had the ability to stop trading of the funds at any time).
Greco & Greco provides free attorney consultations regarding potential cases involving UBS, Popular Securities, Santander Securities, Puerto Rico Closed End Funds, and Puerto Rico bonds. Please contact us here: http://securities-lawyers.net/contact
Hablamos Español (pregunte por Cindy)

Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, highly experienced in stock broker fraud. Arbitration and Litigation, free consultation, based in Virginia and DC area.

08/29/2017

As set out in the below SEC Release, Dawn Bennett is the subject of criminal charges and additional SEC civil charges related to her clothing line DJBennett. Dawn Bennett was formerly registered with Western International Securities.

Greco & Greco is a law firm located in the Virginia, DC, Maryland area representing investors against securities brokerage firms and advisors involving cases of securities fraud, ponzi schemes, unsuitable investments, misstatements, churning, and other investment fraud causes of action. We currently represent and have previously represented harmed investors in FINRA arbitration proceedings against Ms. Bennett and Western International Securities. If you would like to discuss potential claims, please contact Scott Greco for a free consultation at www.securities-lawyers.net.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2017/lr23922.htm

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it has charged a former financial adviser with defrauding investors and spending their money on herself and to make Ponzi-like payments to earlier investors in the alleged scheme.

07/27/2016

Washington DC Investment Advisor Dawn Bennett Barred by SEC
As set out in this SEC Order from an Administrative Law Judge (https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2016/id1033jeg.pdf), Dawn Bennett has been barred from the securities industry by the SEC. Dawn Bennett was a Washington DC area advisor who was previously registered to sell securities with Western International Securities.


Judge Grimes also imposed over one million dollars of fines and disgorgement against Ms. Bennett. The findings in the above Order included the following:


"Respondents repeatedly overstated their AUM [Assets Under Management] by at least $1.5 billion in Barron’s magazine, on a radio show hosted by Bennett, and in various other advertisements and communications with existing and prospective clients to create the impression that Respondents were larger and more successful players in the industry than was actually the case."


Judge Grimes' Order ultimately found that "Respondents made multiple material misstatements with scienter regarding AUM and investor performance. They therefore violated Securities Act Section 17(a)(1) and (2), Exchange Act Section 10(b), and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5(a), (b), and (c)."


Greco & Greco is a law firm located in the Virginia, DC, Maryland area representing investors against securities brokerage firms and advisors involving cases of securities fraud, unsuitable investments, misstatements, churning, and other investment fraud causes of action. We have previously represented harmed investors in FINRA arbitration proceedings against Ms. Bennett and Western International Securities. If you would like to discuss potential claims, please contact Scott Greco for a free consultation. (http://www.securities-lawyers.net/contact.html)


Posted by W. Scott Greco on 07/12/16.
Arbitration ??? Brokerage Firms ??? Western International Securities ??? FINRA ??? Fraud ??? SEC ??? Suitability ???Permalink

Our websites:


www.securities-lawyers.net


www.grecogrecolaw.com


http://securities-fraud-blog.com/index.php/site/washington_dc_investment_advisor_dawn_bennett_barred_by_sec
Show less
www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2016/id1033jeg.pdf
sec.gov

01/27/2016

http://securities-fraud-blog.com/index.php/site/investigation_regarding_randy_watts_of_winchester_virginia

Investigation Regarding Randy Watts of Wi******er, Virginia
Greco & Greco is currently investigating possible claims regarding a Wi******er, Virginia financial advisor, Randy Watts. Mr. Watts operated under the name Watts Financial Group, and was registered to sell securities with Lincoln Financial Securities until November, 2015.

If you believe you may have a legal claim regarding investments with Mr. Watts or Lincoln Financial, please contact Scott Greco for a free consultation: http://www.securities-lawyers.net/contact.html

News and commentary on securities law and investment fraud cases.

SEC and FINRA FINE UBS OVER PUERTO RICO BOND FUNDSThe SEC and FINRA have brought charges and fined UBS relating to sales...
10/09/2015

SEC and FINRA FINE UBS OVER PUERTO RICO BOND FUNDS
The SEC and FINRA have brought charges and fined UBS relating to sales practices and supervision of their UBS Puerto Rico Bond Funds.

The SEC press release and Orders can be found here: http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-217.html. The SEC alleged that UBS Financial Services of Puerto Rico (UBSPR) failed to supervise its broker in relation to solicited loans used to purchase additional UBSPR closed end funds, while failing to disclose the risks of this strategy and misrepresenting the safety of the strategy. The SEC further alleged that UBSPR did not implement reasonable supervisory procedures and had inadequate systems in place to prevent and detect this wrongful conduct.

UBS was censured and fined over fourteen million dollars.

FINRA also fined UBSPR for actions related to its Puerto Rico Bond funds - see the press release here (http://www.finra.org/newsroom/2015/finra-sanctions-ubs-puerto-rico-185-million-supervisory-failures) which states the following:

"...for more than four years, UBS PR failed to monitor the combination of leverage and concentration levels in customer accounts to ensure that the transactions were suitable given the customers' risk objectives and profiles. The firm failed to implement a reasonably designed system to identify and prevent unsuitable transactions in light of the unique Puerto Rican economy, in which retail customers typically maintained high levels of concentration in Puerto Rican assets and often used those highly concentrated accounts as collateral for cash loans. Despite UBS PR's knowledge of these common practices, it failed to adequately monitor concentration and leverage levels to identify whether certain customers' CEF transactions were suitable in light of the increased risks in their existing portfolio."

The above sales practices and lack of supervision have formed the basis of hundreds of FINRA arbitration claims pending against UBS and UBSPR. If you would like to speak to an attorney about possible claims related to UBS of Puerto Rico bond funds, please read more about these claims at Greco & Greco's website (http://www.securities-lawyers.net/ubs_puerto_rico.html) and contact Scott Greco for a free consultation (http://www.securities-lawyers.net/contact.html).

The SEC announces that UBS Puerto Rico has agreed to pay $34 million to the SEC and FINRA to settle charges that it failed to adequately supervise a former broker who was separately charged with fraud.

Address

1300 Old Chain Bridge Road
McLean, VA
22101

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+17038212777

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, P.C. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Securities Fraud Lawyers Greco & Greco, P.C.:

Share