03/26/2026
Do you have an Indiana-based company that has gotten in trouble with a Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) company? In our business debt defense practice we have run into more inquiries from businesspeople with MCA problems. I asked Google Gemini for an overview of the players, and this is what came back (shortened): If any of this information is wrong, let us know.
In Indiana, Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) companies typically don't start their legal battles in local Hoosier courts. Instead, they often use Confessions of Judgment (COJ) or forum-selection clauses to sue in New York or Connecticut first, then "domesticate" those judgments in Indiana to freeze your local bank accounts.
Based on recent 2026 legal trends and defense records, the following companies and groups are known for aggressive litigation or have been frequently named in defense cases involving Indiana businesses:
1. High-Litigation MCA Funders
These companies are frequently cited by defense attorneys (such as Grant Phillips Law and Delancey Street) as being active in filing lawsuits or enforcing liens against defaulting merchants:
Richmond Capital Group / RCG Advances: Historically one of the most aggressive, though they have faced significant federal scrutiny and bans for their collection tactics.
CloudFund & Yellowstone Capital: Known for high-volume filings in New York courts against out-of-state businesses, including those in Indiana.
Itria Ventures (and Biz2Credit affiliates): Often use formal legal channels and UCC-1 filings to secure and pursue debts.
Triton Recovery / TVT Capital: Frequently appear in "domestication" cases where they move an out-of-state judgment into Indiana to seize assets.
2. Companies Using "Foreign Judgments" in Indiana
Many funders sue in New York because of favorable laws, then hire Indiana-based counsel to enforce the judgment. If you bank with regional institutions like Old National Bank, First Internet Bank, or 1st Source, you may see actions from:
TVT Capital
Everest Business Funding (EBF)
Spartan Capital
1st Global Systems
3. Common Tactics Used in Indiana
In 2026, Indiana courts (specifically in Marion County) have become more skeptical of these companies. Here is how they typically pursue Indiana customers:
UCC-1 Liens: They file a notice with the Indiana Secretary of State, which "perfects" their interest in your accounts receivable. This can prevent you from getting any other business financing.
The "Three Pillar Test": Indiana defense attorneys now use this legal standard to argue that an MCA is actually an illegal, high-interest loan rather than a purchase of future sales.
Bank Levies: They don't need to sue you in Indiana to freeze your money; they can serve a "Restraining Notice" on your bank if the bank has a branch in the state where the judgment was originally won.
Important Context for Indiana Business Owners
As of March 2026, Indiana's legal landscape has shifted. The SB 169 reorganization updated the state’s lending code, giving small businesses more leverage to argue that these advances should follow Indiana usury laws.