Glazer Saad Anderson L.C.

Glazer Saad Anderson L.C. GSA Law is a firm that represents individuals in a wide variety of legal matters.

Costs and outcomes are often top of mind when considering litigation. Two of the most common questions clients ask invol...
07/23/2026

Costs and outcomes are often top of mind when considering litigation. Two of the most common questions clients ask involve financial recovery and what happens after a court decision is issued. With that in mind, we wanted to provide clarity about what may happen at the conclusion of a case.

πŸ’ Will the other side pay my attorney fees if I win? Generally, each side pays its own legal fees. However, certain contracts or statutes allow for fee recovery, and courts may award fees in limited circumstances.

πŸ’ What happens after a judgment is entered? If you prevail, the court may award damages or other relief. If payment is not made voluntarily, additional legal steps may be necessary to enforce the judgment.

If you have questions about litigation costs, potential recovery, or enforcing a judgment, call us to discuss your specific matter. We are here to help.

Self-defense is a fundamental right, but it is not a guaranteed shield from arrest or prosecution. Understanding when an...
07/22/2026

Self-defense is a fundamental right, but it is not a guaranteed shield from arrest or prosecution. Understanding when and how you can protect yourself is critical. Swipe through to learn the key facts about self-defense and when it could lead to arrest.

If you are facing legal trouble after acting in self-defense, do not navigate it alone. Call us today.

07/17/2026

πŸ”Ž WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN?

Ancient Rome asked it first: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who watches the watchmen? Two thousand years later, Huntington is being asked to install the watchmen before anyone's answered the question. So before one more camera goes up, let's look at what happens in cities that already said yes because this isn't hypothetical. It's a track record, and it's a warning.

Here is what "trust us" has actually looked like, city by city:

β†’ Oshkosh, Wisconsin: Flock's own chief security officer told the city council, on the record, that the system doesn't build a map of a person's movements. The council voted yes. The very next morning, Flock admitted it does β€” for up to a month at a time.

β†’ Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Officer Josue Ayala searched a woman's license plate and her new boyfriend's 179 times, typing "investigation" as his justification every time. The internal affairs detective assigned to investigate him β€” Detective Terangi Chapman β€” was later charged too, for using the same system to track his own victims.

β†’ Albany, Georgia: Five police officers were arrested simultaneously after an audit found they'd used Flock data for purely personal reasons, unrelated to any case.

β†’ Columbus, Ohio: A city audit found over 15,000 searches of its Flock data connected to possible immigration enforcement, despite a city policy banning it outright. Dayton, Ohio found over 7,000 and shut its system down entirely.

β†’ San Jose, California: Public records suggest the police department gave federal agencies a "side door" into its Flock network, with search reasons logged as vaguely as "CBP" and "ICE."

β†’ Norfolk, Virginia: A university study found the heaviest
concentration of cameras clustered around census tracts that are majority Black β€” including the area surrounding the region's only historically Black university.

β†’ Los Angeles: An internal audit found the LAPD's cameras generated a 32% false-alarm rate on stolen-vehicle alerts β€” roughly one in three flags was wrong, and each one sent armed officers to pull over an innocent driver. On July 11, 2026, LAPD finally let its Flock contract expire over exactly these civil liberties concerns.

This is not a handful of bad apples. It's a pattern, and the company's own numbers admit it: 39 Flock contracts were terminated by cities nationwide in just the first five months of 2026.

Here's the good news, and it's real: every one of these examples ends the same way, with people finding out, speaking up, and forcing change. Oshkosh rescinded its contract in a single day – the fastest reversal on record. LAPD walked away from one of Flock's largest government partnerships. Class-action lawsuits are already underway in California. The watchmen are being watched – because residents, lawyers, and journalists refused to look away.

Ask yourself why Bloomington, IN, Harrisonburg, VA, Dayton, OH, Newport, KY and dozens more are rethinking their use of Flock and ending contracts.

That's exactly the fight Huntington is in right now. We, as part of the legal team, are actively reviewing every avenue available under West Virginia law – from open-meetings violations to how this contract was placed on public property in the first place – because the same accountability that worked in Oshkosh and Los Angeles can work here too. This isn't about outrage for its own sake. It's about the patient, unglamorous work of records requests, legal filings, and organized citizens that has, city after city, actually turned these contracts around.

So here's the question Huntington gets to answer that Rome couldn't: who watches the watchmen? We do. Together – residents, business owners, and lawyers, standing in the same room, asking the same questions, and refusing to accept "trust us" as an answer ever again.

β€” Glazer Saad Anderson L.C.

07/16/2026

THIS FIGHT IS JUST BEGINNING β€” AND IT'S BIG ENOUGH FOR ALL OF HUNTINGTON.

It is Time to Unite.

We've said it before and we'll keep saying it: we are not backing down on Flock. But today we want to say something just as important - this movement only gets stronger by growing wider, not louder. Huntington doesn't win this by out-shouting each other. It wins by out-organizing, together. Do not lose sight of the real issue - Flock and its privacy invasion.

Here's the truth: not everyone in this city has made up their mind yet. Some of our neighbors haven't followed the story closely. Some of our local businesses are worried about crime and just want their storefronts safe – and they're not wrong to want that. Some folks are still deciding how they feel, and that's okay. That's not the opposition. That's the invitation.

It is Time to Unite.

If we treat every undecided neighbor or nervous business owner like an enemy, we lose the very people we need most. So here's our approach going forward, and we're asking you to build it with us:

β†’ We lead with respect, every time - even for those who supported this contract, even for those who are still unsure. Nobody was won over by being talked down to.

β†’ We make room for local businesses at the table, not just city government. Many of them care about privacy and civil liberties just as much as we do - they just haven't been asked yet. If you own or run a business in Huntington and this concerns you, we want to hear from you and stand with you, publicly, if you're willing.

β†’ We answer questions instead of assuming bad faith. If a neighbor asks β€œbut don't we need this for safety,” that's a chance to have a real conversation, not a chance to score a point.

β†’ We keep our eyes on the actual target: an unaccountable surveillance contract with no guardrails - not each other, and not anyone still making up their mind.

It is Time to Unite.

This is bigger than a single vote, and it's bigger than any one of us. It's a chance for Huntington to show the rest of West Virginia - and honestly, the rest of the country - what it looks like when a community disagrees about the details but refuses to let anyone divide it. That kind of unity is rare. It's also the only thing that actually wins fights like this one.

It is Time to Unite.

So here's what we're asking, starting now: bring a neighbor who's undecided into the conversation instead of writing them off. Reach out to a local business owner and ask how this affects them, and really listen. Say thank you to the people who spoke up, whether or not you've met them yet. Widen the circle. This city is stronger together than any six votes could ever be.

We are not finished, and we are not divided. Do not lose sight of the real issue - Flock and its privacy invasion. Huntington is not a battlefield - it's a community, and it's ours to build. Let's build it right.

β€” Glazer Saad Anderson L.C.

Most of us know what arrests and bail are, but the term β€œarraignment” may be lesser known. That’s why our team wanted to...
07/15/2026

Most of us know what arrests and bail are, but the term β€œarraignment” may be lesser known. That’s why our team wanted to break down what an arraignment is and what someone facing a criminal charge can expect at these hearings.

Swipe for more information.

And as always, if you have any questions or need support, our team of lawyers is here to help. Give us a call today, and we can find a time to connect.

07/14/2026

🚨 THE VOTE PASSED. THIS FIGHT DID NOT.

Last night, over 50 of you stood up, one after another, until nearly sunrise, and told City Council exactly what was wrong with this contract. Hundreds more filled the room and the hallway behind them. And six votes decided it didn't matter enough to slow down.

In 1984, the Party didn't need everyone to believe the vote was fair. It just needed everyone to believe nothing could be done about it.

We reject that. We are not going quiet, and we are not going home.
You already know who voted yes. You were in that room, or you've seen the names by now. We don't need to print them again here β€” Huntington has a long memory, and so do we. This was never about party; it's about whether the people who work for you answered to you last night, and whether they will going forward.

Hoyt Glazer stood before Council and said what needed saying: this is not the kind of decision you get to walk back once it's made. That has not changed because the gavel came down at 3 a.m. It means more now, not less. A 6-4 vote does not put a surveillance contract beyond the reach of the Constitution, the ballot box, or the public record. It just means the fight moves from the podium to the street, the mailbox, and the courthouse.

So here is exactly what you can do, starting today. This is not a suggestion box β€” this is a plan.

1. Demand the paper trail β€” File a public records request for the final signed contract, every email between the City and Flock, and any communications among Council members before the vote β€” especially anything about briefing members individually to avoid a public quorum. If this deal was built outside the public's view, that alone may be enough to challenge it.

2. Keep pushing the five safeguards β€” A resolution passing is not the end of the process β€” budgets, vendor task orders, and camera placement still need approval. Every one of those is a new chance to demand: a hard 30-day data deletion, a ban on sharing data with ICE or CBP without a warrant, public audit logs, real penalties for misuse, and an annual public vote to keep this contract alive at all.

3. Make them face the voters β€” Learn what it takes to recall an elected official in Huntington, and learn what it takes to put this question directly on a ballot. Both paths exist under West Virginia law. Start finding out which one your neighborhood is ready to walk.

4. Watch every camera, every log, every quarter β€” Demand this system's audit logs be made public on a regular schedule, not buried in a filing cabinet. If they won't offer oversight, make them build it.

5. Tell us if it touches you β€” If you believe you were stopped, questioned, or investigated because of this system, document everything and bring it to us or to the ACLU of West Virginia. One real story of misuse is worth more than a hundred hypotheticals in a courtroom.

6. Show up again β€” Keep coming to Council. Keep coming to the Huntington Community Action Group. Keep showing up in numbers they cannot pretend not to see.

This is a marathon, not a single vote at 3 a.m. Huntington proved last night it has the numbers, the passion, and the discipline to run it. We are not anti-police. We are not anti-safety. We are pro-Constitution, and we are not finished β€” not even close.

β€” Glazer Saad Anderson L.C.

07/12/2026

🚨 A NOTICE TO HUNTINGTON
FROM GLAZER SAAD ANDERSON L.C.:

What City Council votes on Monday cannot be undone. Not with an apology. Not with a policy update. Not ever.

Once your license plate, your face, your daily route to work, church, or your kid’s school is captured, stored, and searchable - that data exists. That is forever, if the contract doesn't say otherwise. You cannot un-ring that bell. This is why our firm is speaking up: this isn't a policy debate, it's an irreversible decision about what kind of city Huntington becomes.

George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning about a government that watches everything and forgets nothing. Huntington City Council is about to sign the procurement contract for it.

And this data isn't staying local. Flock's system is a nationwide network - a search in Huntington can be run, and can be searched by, any agency plugged into it anywhere in the country. Reports already confirm this data has reached ICE, CBP, and out-of-state departments with zero notice to the people being tracked. Once it leaves this city, we lose all control over where it goes next.

Here's what should alarm every resident, hacker headlines aside: cybersecurity reporting has repeatedly flagged how easily these camera networks can be breached. A centralized, nationwide database of everyone's movements is not just a target for misuse by officials - it's a target for any hacker, criminal ring, or hostile foreign government looking to map the movements of American citizens, law enforcement officers, judges, and public officials alike.

We are being asked to build a single point of failure for our own privacy and hand the key to a private company with no state law requiring them to protect it.

This isn't paranoia; it's Flock Safety's own track record:

β†’ In Oshkosh, WI, Flock's own security chief told a city council, on the record, that the system doesn't track people's movement patterns. That was a lie. Flock admitted it the very next morning - after the council had already voted yes.

β†’ Columbus, OH just uncovered 15,000+ searches of its Flock data tied to possible ICE activity without any warrants or oversight - despite a city policy banning it. This happened in the past week or two.

β†’ Dayton, OH found 7,000+ and shut its whole system down.

If Huntington votes YES on 2026-R-89 and 2026-R-90 exactly as written, we get all of the risk - nationwide data exposure, hacking vulnerability, permanent records - and none of the protection.

Council has two choices. Reject flock all together is the first. If it does not, safeguards must be in place.

Here's what Council MUST lock into the actual contract if they do it at all - not a promise, not a policy page, the contract - before a single camera goes up:

1. A hard 30-day data deletion. This must be automatic, no exceptions.

2. A total ban on sharing our data with ICE, CBP, or any outside agency without a warrant.

3. Public, published audit logs; that is, no vague "investigation" entries hiding misuse.

4. Real consequences - termination and criminal referral for any officer, official, or otherwise who misuses this system.

5. A sunset clause - Council votes on this again, in public, every single year. That is, we must not let this go unchecked without a mandatory annual or semi-annual review.

Benjamin Franklin warned us: trade liberty for safety carelessly, and you end up with neither. Once this infrastructure is built and this data starts moving through a nationwide network, it does not stay narrow and it does not stay safe. It never has - not here, not anywhere.

This is not about being anti-police. We want a safe community just as much as our fellow residents and visitors. It's about refusing to hand over a permanent, hackable record of every innocent life in this city on a promise.

πŸ“’ SHOW UP. Monday, July 13 – Rally at 6PM β€’ Sign-ups to speak at 7PM β€’ Council meeting at 7:30PM. City Hall, 800 5th Ave.

This is the one vote Huntington won't get to take back. Be there.



β€” Glazer Saad Anderson L.C.

With summer in full swing, many families are visiting amusement parks and water parks. These attractions are designed to...
07/09/2026

With summer in full swing, many families are visiting amusement parks and water parks. These attractions are designed to be fun and exciting, but accidents do happen. When injuries occur, it is important to understand your legal rights.

Visitors may accept certain risks when riding attractions or participating in water activities. However, park operators, property owners, equipment manufacturers, and staff members still have legal responsibilities to maintain reasonably safe conditions. When those responsibilities are ignored, injuries may create legal liability.

Swipe for a brief overview of common injuries related to amusement and water parks, liability, and liability waivers.

If you or someone you love has been injured in an amusement or water park this summer and is not sure what to do next, know that our team is always here as a resource. Give us a call, and we can find a time to connect.

When a crash happens, fault is not always one-sided. In some cases, both parties may share responsibility. That is where...
07/07/2026

When a crash happens, fault is not always one-sided. In some cases, both parties may share responsibility. That is where comparative negligence applies. Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine that reduces an injured person’s compensation based on their percentage of fault.

Insurance companies may attempt to shift blame to reduce payouts, so even a small change in fault percentage can significantly impact your recovery. Swipe for more information.

If you have been injured and are concerned about shared fault, do not make assumptions about your case. Contact us to discuss your situation and protect your right to full and fair compensation.

πŸŽ† Happy 250th, America! πŸŽ†250 candles on America's birthday cake β€” and yes, we're still figuring out how to blow them all...
07/05/2026

πŸŽ† Happy 250th, America! πŸŽ†

250 candles on America's birthday cake β€” and yes, we're still figuring out how to blow them all out at once! From the Declaration's bold promise of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" to two and a half centuries of progress (and plenty of growing pains), it's been quite a ride. At Glazer Saad Anderson L.C., we're raising a glass to the Constitution that keeps us all honest, the checks and balances that keep power in check, and the rule of law that has carried this grand experiment through wars, debates, and backyard barbecues alike. Here's to celebrating loudly today β€” and staying vigilant for democracy every other day of the year. Happy Independence Day!

Address

320 Ninth Street, Suite B
Huntington, WV
25701

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+13045224149

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Glazer Saad Anderson L.C. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Glazer Saad Anderson L.C.:

Shortcuts

Share