Attorney Terry P. Roberts

Attorney Terry P. Roberts Director of Appellate Practice for Fischer Redavid PLLC www.frtriallawyers.com

Our firm is in trial in a medical malpractice and wrongful death case. Find out the latest here.
06/18/2025

Our firm is in trial in a medical malpractice and wrongful death case. Find out the latest here.

04/29/2025

When reckless decisions meet serious consequences, we’re ready to hold the responsible parties accountable.�

Recently, we resolved a case in South Florida that involved a group of unlicensed minors operating a golf cart. What started as a joyride quickly turned dangerous when the driver missed a turn, tried to overcorrect, and flipped the cart directly onto the rear seat passenger, our client.�

Our team was able to secure a settlement against not only the negligent driver but also the third-party owner who allowed unlicensed minors to get behind the wheel in the first place. We proved that their negligence directly contributed to the crash and our client's injuries.�

Accountability matters — and we’ll fight to make sure our clients get the justice they deserve.�

HERE'S MY TAKE on what the Florida Supreme Court's opinion on abortion means. I go a little further than usual in pointi...
04/03/2024

HERE'S MY TAKE on what the Florida Supreme Court's opinion on abortion means. I go a little further than usual in pointing out how I think the opinion got it wrong, but I still tried to accurately report what the opinion says and what it means without turning it into a pure editorial piece. Let me know what you think!

Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida v. State of Florida. Our legal team at Fischer Redavid PLLC has the legal experience to help you. Call us about your case today!

04/02/2024

People occasionally find my summary of court decisions to be relatively reliable, so I figured I'd pass on what I've learned from a complete review of Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida v. State of Florida, a decision of the Florida Supreme Court issued yesterday that is, regrettably, not an April Fool's prank.

We all understand by now that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs held that Roe v. Wade (from 1973) and the 1992 Casey decision that mostly retained Roe were wrongly decided, that no one was really relying on them, and that there was no longer a Constitutional right to abortion emanating from privacy protections impliedly existing in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Dobbs purported to return the decisions on abortion legislation to the States.

And while the Florida of 2024 is largely run by right-wing pro-life Republicans, back in 1980, seven years after Roe, Florida voters added an express Privacy Clause to the Florida Constitution. The current Florida Legislature added a 15-week abortion ban, but it also passed a 6-week ban that had "trigger" language where it would only take effect if the Florida Supreme Court held that Florida's privacy clause didn't protect abortion rights.

And yesterday, that's what six of the seven Florida Supreme Court Justices held. For those who are counting and put stock in this sort of thing, five were appointed by Gov. DeSantis, and one (Justice Canady) was appointed by Gov. Crist (when he was the Republican Governor). The three female justices all joined the opinion, with Justice Grosshans, a female justice, authoring the decision. The dissenter was Justice Labarga, the other Crist appointee.

The majority receded from three prior Supreme Court of Florida cases that held that Florida's Privacy Clause contained a right to abortion. The 2024 court held that the word "abortion" isn't in the clause (which is true) and that Florida voters had no real understanding in 1980 that that's what "privacy" meant (which is difficult to accept in light of the fact that lawyers and the media equated Roe and privacy and abortion and privacy).

At the same time, in a decision I have not yet read, the court did refuse to block a pro-choice Florida Constitutional Amendment from being placed on the November 2024 ballot. That was a 4-3 decision. Interestingly, for those who enjoy counting these sorts of things, all four male Justices voted to place the abortion rights on the ballot, while all three female justices voted to keep abortion rights off of the ballot. The three dissenters wrote separate dissents where they fear that Florida voters don't understand what this amendment will do. So let me clear it up for you: it protects abortion rights through the time of viability, at which point the Legislature can make rules banning or restricting abortion. And viability means what it meant for all those years under Casey from 1992 to 2022--the time at which a fetus can survive outside the womb.

Whatever you think about the two decisions, here are the facts. The U.S. Supreme Court threw this decision to the states, and the Florida Supreme Court decision takes away any protections given to us by the Floridians of 1980. Florida's abortion law is in the hands of Florida voters who show up on election day in November 2024. Florida abortion law won't be governed by what judges or voters or politicians thought in 1973, 1980, 1992, or 2022, or 2023. It'll be determined by what Florida voters think in November 2024.
Thirty days from yesterday (so, I think, May 1, right?), Florida will have a 6-week ban on abortion. Maybe it's not getting enough attention because it doesn't take effect until 30 days after the decision issued yesterday, but expect to start hearing talk about it soon.

The text of the proposed amendment would get rid of that 6-week ban and the 15-week ban and create a new right under the Florida Constitution. It will provide that "no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion BEFORE VIABILITY or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider." The amendment will not affect the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor has an abortion.
This WILL be on all Florida general election ballots in November 2024 (the same date as the presidential election). It takes 60% "yes" votes to pass. If you want to be counted on this issue, now is your chance.

03/18/2024

For a SLEW of caselaw updates, make sure to follow Terry's Takes on Instagram at fr.terrystakes_ (yes, it has that underline after it).

Seems like several media outlets are interested in one of our cases...  (By the way...the headline is wrong. Alleging th...
02/16/2024

Seems like several media outlets are interested in one of our cases... (By the way...the headline is wrong. Alleging that the claim is in excess of $75,000 is part of the jurisdictional threshold for bringing certain cases in federal court. That doesn't mean that's the exact damages that you're seeking. It means that you're seeking MORE than $75,000).

A family is suing United Airlines saying the carrier was responsible for child's burns from an inflight meal tray.

01/15/2024
12/21/2023

I'm officially a member of the bar for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (which oversees federal appeals for Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and, more importantly, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the location of one of Fischer Redavid's three offices). Hooray!

10/25/2023

I'm happy to have represented our firm, Fischer Redavid PLLC, to victory in an appeal with an 8-page written opinion from Chief Justice Logue in the Third District Court of Appeal (Florida).

Address

3325 Hollywood Boulevard Ste 500
Hollywood, FL
33021

Telephone

+19548608434

Website

https://www.YourChampions.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Attorney Terry P. Roberts posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Attorney Terry P. Roberts:

Share

Category