05/18/2022
U.S SUPREME COURT LIMITS JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FACTUAL DETERMINATIONS MADE BY U.S IMMIGATION COURT
The U.S Supreme Court on Monday, May 16, 2022, interpreting a Federal Immigration Statute — 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), limited the ability of Federal Courts to review certain factual findings in immigration proceedings that determine whether non-citizens/aliens facing deportation proceedings will be deported or will be allowed to remain in the U.S.
The decision in Patel v. Garland , involved a couple from India, Mr Pankajkumar Patel and his wife, Jyotsnaben(The Couple).
Whereas, the couple entered the United States without authorization in the 1990s. They applied for “adjustment of status,” a discretionary relief available to certain group of aliens in the U.S which relief protects them from deportation and makes them become lawful permanent residents(Green Card holders) of U.S. Mr Patel had applied to U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services(USCIS) for Adjustment of Status, but USCIS denied the application on the ground that Mr Patel had previoulsy misrepresented his citizenship on an application for a Georgia driver’s license by checking the box that he was a U.S citizen, a fact USCIS was aware of.
As a result of the denial by USCIS, Mr Patel was placed in immigration proceedings. The Immigration Judge found that Mr Patel misrepresented his citizenship, consequently ordered him and his wife removed from United States. Mr Patel appealed to the Board of Immigtation Appeal(BIA). BIA denied his appeal. Mr Patel then petitioned Federal Court for review of these determinations. But the Supreme Court eventually held that Federal Immigration Statute — 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) — prevents federal courts from reviewing factual findings that are connected to the executive branch’s judgments about granting discretionary immigration relief.
Therefore, determination by the immigration judge and BIA that Mr Patel misrepresented his citizenship of Georgia,s driver license application are not subject to judicail review.
In other words, certain determinations by immigration court (and BIA) of issue(s) of FACTS (for instance, the mirespresentation by Mr Patel here) rather than determination of issue(s)LAW, cannot be reviewed by federal court by virtue of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).
S. Akin Ogunji, Esq.,
Dallas TX based Immigration Attorney