Kameli Law - En

Kameli Law - En Chicago Immigration Attorneys. Business Immigration Services: Eb1, Eb2-NIW, L-1, E-2, E2, Eb5 visas

Established in 1996, the Law Offices of Kameli and Associates is a full-service law firm located in Chicago with years of experience in:

- U.S. Corporate Law: protection of intellectual property, mergers and acquisitions processes, corporate litigation, shareholder disputes, transaction law, bank loans, and other financing cases;

- Employment Law: tackling any legal trouble in the workplace lik

e labor relations, compensation for workers, employee benefits, discrimination against employees, minimum wage, and social security, etc.;

- Legal Intricacies of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology: helping to start dealing with cryptocurrency or ones who have legal issues or got defrauded;

Getting a new job offer after an H-1B layoff is an important step.But the offer itself does not create H-1B work authori...
09/01/2026

Getting a new job offer after an H-1B layoff is an important step.

But the offer itself does not create H-1B work authorization.

There is a difference between:

getting an interview,

receiving an offer,

starting the employer’s immigration process,

and having a qualifying H-1B petition properly filed.

For eligible workers, H-1B portability may sometimes allow employment with the new petitioner after the required filing is properly made.

But not every worker automatically qualifies.

And an LCA by itself is not the same as an H-1B petition filing with USCIS.

So if you are changing employers after a layoff, ask:

“Can the new employer actually complete the required H-1B filing in time, and am I eligible for portability?”

That question matters more than the offer alone.

To request a free evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Hearing “60-day H-1B grace period” does not necessarily mean you have a full 60 days after losing your job.The current r...
08/30/2026

Hearing “60-day H-1B grace period” does not necessarily mean you have a full 60 days after losing your job.

The current rule generally allows up to 60 consecutive days—or until your authorized validity period ends, whichever comes first.

So the actual window may be shorter.

After a layoff, check:

• when employment actually ceased
• your latest I-94
• your H-1B approval validity
• any pending immigration filings that may affect your situation

Do not automatically assume the final paycheck, severance period, or last physical workday determines the immigration deadline. The employment arrangement itself may need to be reviewed.

Also remember that being allowed to remain during a grace period does not itself give permission to work.

The better question is:

“What is my actual deadline—not just the maximum grace period I have heard about?”

To request a free evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

An RFE can provide an opportunity to submit more evidence.But it should not be treated as the second half of a filing st...
08/28/2026

An RFE can provide an opportunity to submit more evidence.

But it should not be treated as the second half of a filing strategy.

Before submitting a USCIS case, consider a few practical questions:

What must already be true when the case is filed?

What initial evidence is required?

Is an important fact still unsupported?

Are there meaningful inconsistencies?

Am I assuming USCIS will give me another chance to complete the record?

A well-prepared filing can still receive an RFE.

And submitting more documents does not automatically make a case complete.

The important distinction is whether the case is reasonably prepared when filed—or whether known gaps are being left for USCIS to identify later.

To request a free case evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

USCIS may send an RFE if evidence is missing.But applicants should not assume USCIS is required to give them that opport...
08/26/2026

USCIS may send an RFE if evidence is missing.

But applicants should not assume USCIS is required to give them that opportunity in every case.

RFEs and NOIDs still exist. However, depending on the case and applicable procedure, USCIS may also deny some benefit requests without first issuing either notice.

That does not mean every missing document automatically causes a denial.

The practical lesson is simpler:

Do not knowingly file a material gap because you expect USCIS to tell you what is missing later.

Before filing, ask:

If I already know something important is unsupported, is this case actually ready to submit?

Even a carefully prepared filing may still receive an RFE.

The goal is not to predict every question USCIS may ask. It is to avoid relying on a future RFE as part of the filing plan.

To request a free case evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Premium Processing can speed up USCIS action on an eligible I-140.It does not make the petition itself stronger.Paying f...
08/24/2026

Premium Processing can speed up USCIS action on an eligible I-140.

It does not make the petition itself stronger.

Paying for faster processing does not add evidence, change the EB-1A or NIW requirements, lower the eligibility standard, or guarantee approval.

USCIS may still approve the case, deny it, issue an RFE, or issue a NOID.

And if an RFE is issued during Premium Processing, that does not by itself mean Premium Processing caused the RFE.

The key distinction is simple:

Processing speed and case strength are not the same thing.

Before choosing Premium Processing, ask:

Do I need USCIS to act faster, or does the underlying petition still need more work?

Premium Processing can be valuable when timing is the real problem.

It should not be treated as a way to strengthen the merits of the case.

To request a free EB-1A or EB-2 NIW evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Planning for EB-1A one or two years in advance should not mean trying to collect a certain number of credentials.A more ...
08/22/2026

Planning for EB-1A one or two years in advance should not mean trying to collect a certain number of credentials.

A more useful approach is:

Build genuine professional achievements.

Document them while they are happening.

Review what they may actually support.

Then decide whether waiting still adds value.

One or two years is not a required waiting period for EB-1A.

Some professionals may benefit from more time. Others may already have achievements worth evaluating today.

For example, publishing meaningful work can matter more than simply increasing a publication count.

Completing legitimate peer-review work is different from only receiving invitations.

And a leadership title becomes more useful when the actual responsibilities and impact behind that title are clear.

The goal is not to manufacture an immigration résumé.

The goal is to build a genuine professional record and preserve reliable evidence of what actually happened.

Waiting is not automatically better. The timing decision should depend on the record that exists and what additional time is realistically expected to add.

If EB-1A may be relevant to your future plans, you may request a free evaluation:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Can important work completed inside one employer support an EB-1A original-contributions claim?It may.Internal records c...
08/20/2026

Can important work completed inside one employer support an EB-1A original-contributions claim?

It may.

Internal records can help show what the applicant created, the applicant’s specific role, whether the work was implemented, and what technical, clinical, operational, or business results followed.

They may also show that the organization relied on the contribution.

But internal success and field-level significance are not automatically the same thing.

The evidence should also help explain why the contribution mattered in the relevant profession or field.

That context might include use outside the employer, adoption by other organizations, influence on professional practice, transferable impact, industry reliance, recognition by qualified professionals, or evidence that the work addressed a broader field problem.

No single type of impact evidence is required in every case.

Internal, confidential, proprietary, or employer-owned work is not automatically excluded. External adoption may be useful, but it is not universally required.

The practical question is:

What evidence connects the internal result to broader significance in the field?

To request a free EB-1A evidence evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Does receiving a peer-review invitation mean an EB-1A applicant has already participated as a judge?The documents may pr...
08/18/2026

Does receiving a peer-review invitation mean an EB-1A applicant has already participated as a judge?

The documents may prove different things.

An invitation may show that the applicant was asked to review.

Acceptance may show that the applicant agreed.

A completed-review confirmation, reviewer history, or editorial record may help document that the review was actually performed.

The evidence should also connect the activity to work in the applicant’s field or an allied field.

An invitation can still be useful. It simply may not establish the same fact as completed participation.

Additional context—such as recurring invitations, selectivity, the scope of the reviewing forum, and why the applicant was chosen—may also be relevant when the complete EB-1A record is evaluated.

There is no universal required number of reviews, and completing a review does not by itself guarantee that the judging criterion or final EB-1A standard is satisfied.

The practical question is:

Does the evidence prove an invitation, acceptance, or actual completed judging?

To request a free EB-1A evidence evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Who will actually handle and review your immigration case?Many firms use teams that include attorneys, paralegals, legal...
08/16/2026

Who will actually handle and review your immigration case?

Many firms use teams that include attorneys, paralegals, legal assistants, administrative staff, translators, and other supervised personnel.

That is normal.

An attorney does not necessarily need to personally prepare every document.

But applicants should understand:

Who makes legal decisions?

Who supervises the work?

Who reviews the facts?

Who approves the legal arguments?

Who checks the final submission?

Who provides updates?

How are urgent issues escalated?

Staff participation is not a warning sign by itself.

What matters is whether responsibility, supervision, communication, and final review are clearly explained.

To request a free immigration case evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Before relying on an immigration provider, verify more than the title shown on a website or social-media profile.For an ...
08/14/2026

Before relying on an immigration provider, verify more than the title shown on a website or social-media profile.

For an attorney, applicants may want to confirm the full professional name, licensing jurisdiction, current status, and publicly available disciplinary information through the official licensing authority.

Immigration attorneys may be licensed in a U.S. jurisdiction different from the state where the client lives.

DOJ-accredited representatives may also provide authorized immigration legal services through recognized organizations and within the limits of their accreditation.

They are not attorneys, but they should not automatically be treated as unauthorized providers.

The better question is:

Where can I independently verify this person’s current authorization and permitted scope?

To request a free immigration case evaluation, visit:

https://legal.kameli.com/evaluation-fb

You may also use the Get messages button on Facebook to contact our team.

Address

Chicago, IL

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+13122331000

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Kameli Law - En posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share