Law Offices of John A. Culver, Ltd.

Law Offices of John A. Culver, Ltd. AREAS OF PRACTICE:
Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Negligence
Health Care
Products John A.

Culver has over 3 decades experience as a trial lawyer in the areas of medical and professional negligence, health care and products liability, as well as all variety of torts including wrongful death, catastrophic injury, premises liability, auto and other accidents. John also is National Counsel for a Chicago-based power press manufacturer, as well as General Counsel for Ultimate Chicago, which operates Ultimate Frisbee leagues and tournaments.

What is so distressingly wrong with the basic jurisprudence of the conservative majority of the US Supreme Court.
09/25/2024

What is so distressingly wrong with the basic jurisprudence of the conservative majority of the US Supreme Court.

There is more incontrovertible evidence of Trump’s guilt in the Jan. 6 cases than there was of Marcellus Williams’ guilt in a murder.

Lying under oath in a federal pleading is sanctionable conduct--every attorney that signed this brief should suffer the ...
01/04/2024

Lying under oath in a federal pleading is sanctionable conduct--every attorney that signed this brief should suffer the consequences.

He’s back to loudly claiming—even in court—that the 2020 election was stolen from him. His lawyers should be held accountable.

Thoughtful and well-researched article by Franklin Foer about the Attorney General's obligations, considerations and ult...
10/11/2022

Thoughtful and well-researched article by Franklin Foer about the Attorney General's obligations, considerations and ultimately, duty. As Politico notes, in a "Fun Aside": “When he was on the bench, Garland would occasionally orient new clerks to his idiosyncrasies by playing a song by the band Vampire Weekend which contains the refrain, ‘Who gives a f**k about an Oxford comma?’ It was amusing because the band was so distant from his range of expected cultural references, and because the strait-laced attorney general would never utter that sentence himself. It was also funny because Garland does care about punctuation, deeply.” A Lawyer's Lawyer

It’s clear to me that Merrick Garland will bring charges against Donald Trump. It’s just a matter of when.

We have an ethical obligation to do so; I will persist.
10/05/2021

We have an ethical obligation to do so; I will persist.

Defending democracy must be the primary responsibility of this profession.

The Federalist Society has forever flirted with fascism, and finally finds its fair footing.
07/16/2021

The Federalist Society has forever flirted with fascism, and finally finds its fair footing.

A group so complicit in the Jan. 6 insurrection should not occupy a place of respect in the legal community.

This loathsome shyster is a mortifying discredit to the entire profession.
06/25/2021

This loathsome shyster is a mortifying discredit to the entire profession.

Giuliani disgraced his profession by defending Trump.

While there is a difference of opinion amongst constitutional experts, the better and more considered opinion, as well a...
01/15/2021

While there is a difference of opinion amongst constitutional experts, the better and more considered opinion, as well as precedent, supports the proposition that the current placeholder in the White House properly is subject to the upcoming Senate trial. Or, as the attached picture suggests: "I want you...to impeach me".

The Senate will retain the constitutional power — and duty — to conduct an impeachment trial of Trump even when he is no longer president.

Protected 1st Amendment speech?  Absolutely.  That serves to bring the profession into (further) disrepute?  Without a d...
01/14/2021

Protected 1st Amendment speech? Absolutely. That serves to bring the profession into (further) disrepute? Without a doubt. I would like to say good riddance, but I don't expect he'll be slinking off the national stage just yet.

John Eastman, a conservative lawyer and professor, retired from Chapman University after facing blowback for speaking at rally before the Capitol riots.

"The impeachment power must never be exercised lightly. But the House would be fully justified in finding that Trump’s i...
01/09/2021

"The impeachment power must never be exercised lightly. But the House would be fully justified in finding that Trump’s incitement of mob violence against the United States government warrants that drastic remedy."

The House would be fully justified to use this drastic remedy.

12/09/2020

I proudly support and signed this open letter:

Call for Bar Condemnation and Investigation of President Trump’s Campaign Lawyers for Subverting American Democracy

December 3, 2020 By Administrator

More than 35 losses in election-related cases have made one thing painfully clear: President Trump’s barrage of litigation is a pretext for a campaign to undermine public confidence in the outcome of the 2020 election, which inevitably will subvert constitutional democracy. Sadly, the President’s primary agents and enablers in this effort are lawyers, obligated by their oath and ethical rules to uphold the rule of law.

Bar Associations need to condemn this abuse and bar disciplinary authorities need to investigate it.

The President put Rudolph Giuliani in charge of the Trump legal team. Notwithstanding their monumental string of losses, Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, Joseph DiGenova, Victoria Toensing and, until November 23, Sidney Powell, have persisted with press statements, purported “hearings,” and continuing litigation. Behind the fog created by this waste and distraction of the country’s attention is a President’s and his lawyers’ historic abuse of the judicial process.

The strategy involves three prongs:

First, without any basis in fact, the lawyers make press statements about Democrats’ widespread pattern of fraud — in an election federal officials have called “the most secure in American history.”
Then, in courtrooms, where judges hold attorneys accountable, the lawyers abandon fraud assertions, making speculative claims that judges quickly dismiss.
Last, back before television cameras, the lawyers return to wild fraud and conspiracy claims that echo the President’s.
To quote from Mr. Giuliani’s November 19 press conference:

“There was a massive attack on the integrity of the voting system . . . The people who did this have committed one of the worst crimes that I’ve ever seen. . . . They have trashed . . . dishonored . . . destroyed the right to vote in their greed for power and money. And there’s no doubt about it. This is not an individual idea of 10 or 12 Democrat bosses. This is a plan.”
“[Democrats] picked the places where . . . judges would just dismiss [our fraud claims]. Because judges are appointed politically. And too many of them are hacks.”
Federal judges appointed by presidents of both parties, including by President Trump himself, have rejected the Trump legal teams’ factual assertions and legal claims, more than one in scathing terms. Factcheck.org called the public statements by the lawyers a “gusher of false and unfounded allegations.” Even Attorney General William Barr has stated that there is no evidence of widespread election fraud.

Still, Mr. Giuliani’s aim is obvious: to fuel Mr. Trump’s campaign to delegitimize the outcome of the election. Attorneys take an oath to support the Constitution. Lawyers who lie to advance the partisan interest of a politician or any client dishonor the constitutional system they’ve sworn to uphold, the legal profession and themselves.

That dishonor is especially clear in the case of Trump lawyer Joseph DiGenova’s outrageous November 30 statement on Newsmax that former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Christopher Krebs, should be “taken out at dawn and shot.”

A license to practice law is not a license to lie to the public on behalf of a client, whether doing so endangers one individual or the entire body politic. Indeed, American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct 4.1(a) and 8.4(c) put lawyers at risk of sanctions for engaging in dishonesty, deceit and misrepresentation — in or out of court. Under Rule 3.1, lawyers filing frivolous claims are also subject to sanctions.

The conduct of Mr. Giuliani and his colleagues is a disgrace. As 25 former DC Bar presidents stated on December 1, it is indefensible for lawyers to falsely proclaim widespread voting fraud, submit a pattern of frivolous court claims and actively seek to undermine citizens’ faith in our election’s integrity.

We condemn this conduct without reservation. It demeans the legal profession and the multitudes of lawyers of all political persuasions who daily serve their clients and the public honorably. Our profession needs to affirm that this behavior grossly deviates from the bar’s deep commitment to democratic institutions and the fact-based processes that maintain our democracy’s vitality.

We urge all lawyers and bar associations to publicly condemn this conduct and bar disciplinary authorities to investigate it. Silence and inaction are not options.

Not least, "a power in the president to pardon himself for any and all crimes against the United States he committed wou...
12/08/2020

Not least, "a power in the president to pardon himself for any and all crimes against the United States he committed would grievously offend the animating constitutional principle that no man, not even the president, is above and beyond the law." Thus, a "US" president cannot "Grant" himself a pardon.

The Framers would have regarded a self-pardon as a presidential act more akin to an obstruction of justice for criminal offenses.

Address

4707 N Broadway Street Ste 305
Chicago, IL
60640

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Law Offices of John A. Culver, Ltd. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Law Offices of John A. Culver, Ltd.:

Share