06/24/2025
Of course, I didn't "initiate 162/4 cases in 72 counties" and but of course it's a lie that "24 counties of NC entered a gatekeeper order against me."
Good Day Charlotte and beyond,
Recall that Lisa Bell fraudulently reported to The Charlotte Observer that she entered a gatekeeper order against because "McDaniel [I] had initiated 162/4 cases in 72 counties"
Generally, defamation is a false statement made about another person, without regard for the accuracy of that statement, with either negligence or malicious intent to harm the subject person.
False light in the public eye is similar to defamation but in that the defamatory statements are based on misleading implications or portrayals, even if the underlying facts are true.
Injurious falsehood is also similar to defamation but entails defamatory statements made about a business or a person's economic interests.
Returning to defamation, defamation is the general term for both defamation and libel. More specifically, however, defamation is spoken false statements and libel is written false statements.
In this case, Lisa's and The Charlotte Observer's libel constitutes defamation generally, libel specifically, false light in the public eye and injurious falsehood.
It is NOT true that I initiated 162/4 cases in 72 counties of NC. And if you believe it, then you also highly likely (1) believe Trump is a great leader (2) there is no such thing as climate change (3) and leprechauns are real and live with elves at the North Pole.
Under NC statutory law (that's the binding law on the books), libel is a CRIME.
While it may be true that judges enjoy absolute immunity generally for civil wrongs or torts, judges enjoy ABSOLUTELY NO IMMUNITY FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.
The reason I included injurious falsehood is because it is true that a preceding gatekeeper order was entered against me in Guilford County, but it is NOT true that the gatekeeper order is valid. Y'all should be crystal clear on the crimes and torts that Emily Jeffords Meister, T. Keith Black, Jennifer Reuter, Richard Long Huffman, Michelle Feimster Bailey, Judge Lindsay Davis, Judge Carl Fox, Judge Anna Mills Wagoner et alii committed against me.
Before the integration of Odyssey (the e-filing system in NC) it had been near impossible for me to obtain proof from each county (100 total in NC) showing that there were no cases for which I was even a party, let alone a gatekeeper order entered against me in 24 counties that Huffman lied about
In Guilford County, the county of origin, I have renewed my Motion to Vacate the Gatekeeper Order Due To Constructive Fraud, Motion to Strike My Birth Name Et Cetera. Judge Wood initially ignored my pleading submissions for 6 months, then after I escalatedly publicized their crimes against me, he approved the filing but peremptorily disposed of my motion without a hearing on January 19, 2024 (which means he denied it ex parte, which is a gross due process violation and thus unlawful and unconstitutional)
I appealed. Or attempted because Guilford County has also unconstitutionally restricted my notices of appeal to pre-filing review. And yes, you guess it ... Judge Wood denied the filing of my Notice of Appeal, which is unlawful because it was an appeal by right. So, I renewed my motion again, or rather submitted it for pre-filing review, which he denied. I submitted my Notice of Appeal, which he approved for filing ... only after I had escalatedly re-publicized their crimes. However, because he tardily approved the filing of my Notice of Appeal, and the time to give such notice had expired, the North Carolina Court of Appeals dismissed my appeal on who's motion??? Yup, Emily Jeffords Meister and T. Keith Black.
The statutory procedural law is finite as to the time to take appeal, which cannot be extended by even the higher courts.
So, if you're paying attention, then when I say that they have "subjected me to bad faith corrupt enforcement of the gatekeeper order" ... this is what I'm talking about.
They use the gatekeeper in a way prohibited by gatekeeper laws.
Should be easy to get overturned, right?
Yeah it seems so if the law is strictly regarded.
But they are NOT strictly regarding the law.
Why not? Because it serves the core purpose of their conspiracy and constructive fraud against me.
But the truth and justice always prevail.
With the integration of Odyssey, I have been able to more conveniently access records from at least the 73 counties that have implemented the e-filing system ... or rather I'm working on it. As for the "24 counties that entered a gatekeeper order against me" according to Richard Long Huffman, of course I already it wasn't true because duh I would possess superlative knowledge about my own life AND gatekeeper orders can NOT be entered in any jurisdiction without at least service of a summons and complaint ... even if they held an ex parte (without hearing) to enter the fraudulent order ...
I contacted all 24 counties ... and what do you think they said???
I needn't just "tell" you ... I'll show you instead. Here's the link to my renewed Motion to Vacate the Fraudulent Gatekeeper Order.
https://2c0ef011-e452-47f9-9c42-697094bce22a.filesusr.com/ugd/59e0d7_a15a8c5f983c48609007037ec5d7b4cb.pdf
You can also access it by visiting my campaign website at www.THEseetigressrun.com and click on the image that I have attached to this post (again on my website for the slow folk lol). The image is not navigable from this post.
I submitted it yesterday to Brittany Robbins in Guilford County who is court staff to whom I've been instructed to submit my pleadings for pre-filing review. In this document you'll see (1) my email submission to her, (2) my leading motion, and (3) evidentiary support including the responses from the counties that have responded to my inquiry thus far ... Northampton, Martin, Hertford, Halifax, Duplin, Cumberland, and Gaston counties have not yet responded ... I am following up.
Their gig is up. Meister, Black, Reutter, Huffman, Bailey, Wagoner, Davis, Fox, et alii (and others) have been defaming me for over a decade. It stops now.
Oh to complete my thought:
Here's the statutory law for libel,
§ 14‑47. Communicating libelous matter to newspapers.
If any person shall state, deliver or transmit by any means whatever, to the manager, editor, publisher or reporter of any newspaper or periodical for publication therein any false and
libelous statement concerning any person or corporation, and thereby secure the publication of the same, he shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. (1901, c. 557, ss. 2, 3; Rev., s. 3635;
C.S., s. 4229; 1969, c. 1224, s. 1; 1993, c. 539, s. 25; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).)
So, not only are they criminally liable to me for libel, but even more so for criminal conspiracy and constructive fraud.
Oh and let's not forget - PERJURY
§ 14‑209. Punishment for perjury.
If any person knowingly and intentionally makes a false statement under oath or affirmation in any suit, controversy, matter or cause, or in any unsworn declaration deemed sufficient pursuant toG.S. 7A‑98 depending in any of the courts of the State; in any deposition or affidavit taken pursuant to law; in any oath or affirmation duly administered of or concerning any matter or thing where such person is lawfully required to be sworn or affirmed, that person is guilty of perjury, and punished as a Class F felon. (1791, c. 338, s. 1, P.R.; R.C., c. 34, s. 49; Code, s. 1092; Rev., s. 3615; C.S., s. 4364; 1979, c. 760, s. 5; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1316, s. 47; 1981, c. 63, s. 1; c. 179, s. 14; 1993, c. 539, s. 1202; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 2019‑243, s. 3(c); 2021‑47, s. 17(b).)
