Betras Kopp

Betras Kopp Betras• Kopp LLC is one of the most respected personal injury, complex litigation, and criminal defense law firms in the region.

Our practice focuses on people hurt in vehilcle accidents, medical malpractice family law, and complex business litigation. The primary focus of our law firm is on personal injury, medical malpractice and criminal defense. We also have attorneys who dedicate their practices to family law and divorce, insurance disputes, environmental litigation, and sports law. We are devoted to helping our client

s resolve their claims and disputes and quickly as possible, and with the best possible result. No matter what type of legal problem you have, there are state and federal laws designed to protect your interests. Rest assured that the professional lawyers at Betras, Kopp, & Markota LLC stay abreast of changes in the law that may affect the outcome of our clients’ cases.

https://youtu.be/oVIl7TrLXK0In this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today, Professor David Betras convenes another s...
06/02/2026

https://youtu.be/oVIl7TrLXK0

In this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today, Professor David Betras convenes another session of his popular “Shade Tree” Law School. The topic of todays lecture: Statutes of Limitations: what they are and how they impact both civil and criminal law.
We invite you to take notes, remind you that no gum chewing is allowed in class, and emphasize that there will NOT be a quiz at the end of lesson…
Good morning class. As you may have noticed, a few lawsuits have been filed over the past week related to the explosion that nearly destroyed the Realty Building, killed on person, and seriously injured others.
The timing of the filing is interesting because it coincides with the impending expiration of the two-year statute of limitations that apply to many civil suits.
With that as preface, let’s dig in.
First, the time span for civil and criminal cases is wildly different. In general negligence suits like the ones pending against the Realty Building carry a two yar limit. But, because we’re speaking about the law, there are exceptions that could extend the time period by two years.
In cases dealing with contracts the limit is generally eight years, ten years is fraud is involved. \
Medical, legal, accounting and other types of professional malpractice have a one-year limit that under certain circumstances can be extended to two or more but may never exceed four years.
In criminal cases the limits are longer. For example, there is no statute of limitations for murder. In Ohio, the statute for r**e is 25 years. If DNA is found, however, charges must be brought five years after the DNA has been discovered.
Most other serious criminal offenses carry statutes ranging from five to eight years although some factors, including the age of the victim, may extend the time limit for a particular crime.
The principle behind all this is the government’s desire to spur people to exercise their rights under the law in a reasonable amount of time.
If you do not, you commit “laches” which means you have waited so long to file a claim or seek relief in court that you are no longer permitted to file the claim. In short, it’s use it or lose it.
So that's sort of the down and dirty of statute of limitations. In the Realty Building explosion, three cases have been filed in the last week—a full two years after the incident.
It’s important to note that waiting until the last minute to file does not necessarily weaken a case, but filing early ensures that evidence is preserved and witnesses are deposed before their memories fade. That’s why we routinely issue preservation of evidence demands when we are involved in a negligence case.
That notification can be critical because if the defendants in a case destroy evidence that works to our benefit because it infers the evidence would have helped us.
Finally, I’m often asked why the limits are what they are, particularly in civil matters. The easy—and the right answer—is insurance companies. They spend a lot of time and money lobbying legislators across the country to shorten limits because doing so protects their clients and makes it more difficult for injured people to seek and secure justice
I’d be remiss, however, if I didn’t place some of the blame for the convoluted system on my own profession. The more complicated we make certain aspects of the law, the more likely it is that people will need to hire an attorney.
That’s it, class dismissed, and thanks for attending Professor Dave’s Shade Tree Law School.
If find this and our other content, interesting, entertaining, and informative, do us a solid by mashing the “Subscribe,” “Like,” and “Share” buttons—that’s the best way to ensure you never miss a new video

In this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today, Professor David ...

05/28/2026

Join us

� New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! �

We are pleased and proud to announce the Attorney Steve Dettlebach will be our special guest on the May 28, 2026 edition...
05/27/2026

We are pleased and proud to announce the Attorney Steve Dettlebach will be our special guest on the May 28, 2026 edition of Legally Speaking, the nation's longest-running and most popular legal advice podcast.

Attorney Dettlebach served as Director of the Bureau of Alchohol, To***co, Fi****ms, and Explosives (ATF) from \ 2022 to 2026. Prior to his appointment to the ATF he was the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio for six years.

Today Steve is a partner at Baker Hostetler, one of the nation's most prestigoius law firms. He leads Baker's Litigation Practice Group and is a member of the firm's Policy Committee.

Stever posseses a wealth of knowledge, experience, and a unique perspective on the law and government and we are pleases he has agreed to share it with our listeners and viewers.

As usual, you can listen live from 5 PM to 6 PM on WKBN 570 AM and the iHeart radio app and watch the action on our page, YouTube Cahnnel, and Instagram.

Have a question? Call 330-729-9977 or DM us during the show, we'll have the answer you need.

Can't listen or watch live?

No problem---every episode is available on the major podcast platforms and archived on our social media sites.

So make it a point to join us for this very special of edition of Legally Speaking.

https://youtu.be/nB1gEuixxhYThe Crash, the  #2 movie in Netflix’s global rankings, was the fascinating subject of this e...
05/26/2026

https://youtu.be/nB1gEuixxhY

The Crash, the #2 movie in Netflix’s global rankings, was the fascinating subject of this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today.
The documentary delves into the details surrounding a horrific car crash in nearby Strongsville, Ohio in 2022 that took the lives of 20-year-old Dominic Russo and Damion Flanagan aged 19 and left the driver of the vehicle which hit a brick wall at 100 MPH, 17-year-old Mackenzie Shirilla critically injured.
Initially regarded as a tragic accident, forensic evidence from the car’s “black box” and statements given to police by friends of Shirilla and Russo who had been in a romantic relationship for years, soon mae the 17-year-old survivor the subject of a homicide investigation.
Eventually, Shirilla was indicted on 12 counts, including murder and aggravated vehicular homicide.
During her trial in 2023 she claimed she had blacked out while driving due to Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), a medical conditioin which causes dizziness, rapid heartbeat, fainting, and loss of consciousness.
The judge presiding over the bench trial—Shirilla chose not to have a jury trial—found her guilty on all counts. She was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 15 years.
According to respected criminal defense attorney Frank Cassese, in the vast majority of cases like this, Shirilla would have been charged with aggravated vehicular homicide.
In this instance, however, Shirilla was charged with aggravated murder. He said it was interesting to watch how the detectives investigating the crash constructed the case.
They started by examining data from the vehicle’s black box which revealed she was traveling at 100 MPH and never hit the brakes before hitting the wall.
They also have a of the car roaring down the street just before the crash. The video doesn’t show the impact, but it can be heard clearly.
The police then dissected Shirilla’s vast social media presence.
Her friends maintain that Shirilla was simply following the trends that attract followers. But some people viewing the content could have come away with the impression that whe was cold, calculating, and callous.
According to Atty. Cassese, Shirilla has all but exhausted her appeals. And while he doesn’t like to Monday Morning Quarterback decisions made by other lawyers, he says he would have opted for a jury trial rather than having the case heard by a judge.
He also commented on whether the documentary would influence the judges who are considering her final appeal.
For better or worse, this kind of documentary and other true crime shows are a fact of life in today’s legal system.
Look at the Karen Reed trial. She did a documentary before her first trial which ended in a hung jury and the start of her second trial which resulted in an acquittal. So, maybe it worked to her advantage.
In Shirilla’s case, her social media and the documentary have generated interest in and contributions to her Go Fund Me page so she has the money she needs to hire attorneys to continue to fight her conviction. So all the attention is, in a manner of speaking, paying off.
Frank concluded by noting that Shirilla’s father who is a teacher was put on administrative leave by the school district he works for because of comments he made during interviews that appear in the film. I’m interested in how that will play out because honestly, it was a father using his First Amendment rights to defend his child. Frankly, that’s what he’s supposed to do.
But at the end of the day, I feel for the people on both sides because they all lost so much.
I really do recommend the film and I urge everyone to set aside the time to watch.

If you enjoy this episode and our other content please do us a sollid by mashing the "Like," "Share," and "Subscribe" buttons--thanks for watching, we appreciate your support.

The Crash, the #2 movie in Netflix’s global rankings, was the fasci...

05/21/2026

Join us

� New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! �

In this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today, BK Shareholder, SuperLawyer, and respected criminal defense attorney ...
05/19/2026

In this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today, BK Shareholder, SuperLawyer, and respected criminal defense attorney Frank Cassese provides perspective on the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the conviction of Alex Murdaugh, the prominent personal injury lawyer found guilty of murdering his wife Maggie and son Paul at their home in 2021.
Murdaugh’s 2023 trial garnered worldwide media attention rivaling the O.J. Simpson case. After being found guilty by a jury, Murdaugh was sentenced to two consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole.
But, in a shocking turn of events, South Carolina’ high court, citing jury tampering and misconduct by the court clerk during the original trial, overturned the verdict and ordered that Murdaugh be retried.

According to Attorney Cassese, allegations of jury tampering by the clerk of courts assigned to the case arose during the trial. The Supreme Court found the clerk had improperly attempted to influence the jury during the proceedings. That finding led to the reversal of the Murdaugh’s conviction.
Attorney Cassese explained that jury tampering is the number one “no-no” in criminal and civil cases.
“Jury deliberations are very sacred,” Atty. Cassese said. “So it is an egregious violation to tamper with that process.”
Frank noted that even though his murder conviction has been overturned, Murdaugh has been sentenced to 40 years in prison for financial crimes he committed during his legal career. So even though the Supreme Court has ordered a new trial, Murdaugh won’t be getting out of prison any time soon. “That means he could go back to court, be acquitted of the murder charges and still remain in prison for the rest of his life.”
“As a trial lawyer, someone attempting to improperly influence a jury is one of the biggest concerns you can ever have,” Atty. Cassese continued.
“There were allegations that the court clerk in question had a stake in the outcome of the trial because she had negotiated a deal to write a book about the crime and the trial. That’s what led to the reversal,” he said.
Frank then discussed juries and undue influence in general. “People don't realize that when they see news and sees snippets of stories about cases they’re not getting the whole picture of the matter being tried.”
“On the other hand, a jury sees all the evidence, and it is the state’s responsibility—whether it is the state of Ohio or the state of South Carolina—to use that evidence to prove the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said.
“So sometimes when people are acquitted, it doesn't necessarily mean a jury thinks they're innocent. It means that the prosecutors didn't prove their case,” Atty. Cassese noted.
“And here is a critically important point: the jury is only permitted to consider the evidence that is presented to them. They can’t or watch stories in the media and they can’t Google search for information,” he continued.
“Why? Because information from outside the proceedings can be illegitimate or inaccurate. That is why judges often give jurors strict orders not to speak to others about the case, not to look up info on their phone, or read about the case on social media.”
Frank also took note of the fact that the Attorney General of South Carolina said the case would be retried as quickly as possible and emphasized that no one was above the law.
“He made those statements because he wanted to assure the public that although Murdaugh was once a prominent and powerful figure in the state he won’t receive special treatment. He wants people to know justice will be served,” Atty. Cassese concluded.

In this episode of Legally Speaking on WFMJ Today, BK Shareholder, SuperLawyer, and respected criminal defense attorney Frank Cassese provides perspective on...

BK Managing Shareholder and renowned criminal defense attorney David Betras provides his perspective on the South Caroli...
05/18/2026

BK Managing Shareholder and renowned criminal defense attorney David Betras provides his perspective on the South Carolina Superem Courts's decision to overturn Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction. A jury had found Murdaugh guilty of brutally slaying his wife Maggie and son Paul at the family home in 2021. Murdaugh’s 2023 trial was one of the most highly publicized, commented upon and watched criminal trials in decades.

In its ruling, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled jury tampering tainted the trial and threw out Murdaugh’s conviction. The State of Carolina will now retry the once-prominent personal injury lawyer.

According to David Betras the case is significant not because of its notoriety, but because the jury system is the very foundation of American jurisprudence. Betras asserts that anything that taints the system undermines our fundamental rights erodes faith in the law and the courts.

BK Managing Shareholder and renowned criminal defense attorney David Betras provides his perspective on the South Carolina Superem Courts's decision to overt...

05/14/2026

Ever wonder what attorneys actually do?

Apparently, so do a few million people on TikTok.

In this video, BK managing Shareholder David Betras pulls back the curtain and gives the world an insiders view of his profession...

Address

6630 Seville Drive
Canfield, OH
44406

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Betras Kopp posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Betras Kopp:

Share