Law Office of Evan Groff

Law Office of Evan Groff A local practice serving primarily the South Bay Area, Specializing in Family Law, Workers' Compensation, and Social Security Disability laws.

06/11/2020

COVID-19 CUSTODY EXCHANGES (FAMILY LAW):

Please remember that quarantine has not removed all obligations under existing court orders. As with most things in the legal system, the answer is "it depends".

The court is primarily concerned with the "best interests of the child", so if a parent is displaying flagrant disregard of safety during the public-health crisis, then their co-parent can reasonably refuse to allow transfer (perhaps as long as a 14-days incubation period). This, however, presents many legal problems.

First, a court order is "an order'. It can be a crime not to comply (CA Penal Code 278 "Child Prevention" laws) - which are the equivalent of "abduction" by a co-parent, for violating the custody schedule. However, under the exceptions of P.C. 278.5, a parent can at least argue to refuse to comply with a custody transfer for child safety. Whether or not this is a "crime", lies in the hands of both the responding officers and the prosecuting and defending attorneys in a criminal court. This is "gray area".

However, the question continues to arise if one parent can refuse a custody transfer for this-or-that reason. There are no clear answers.

What is clear, at least in Santa Clara County, is that court hearings are being constantly reset to latter dates, and that the court clerk's office is woefully under-staffed and is (therefore) only responding to emergency matters. No matter what your level of complaint is, if the court even considers it "emergency", at this moment it may take weeks for them to even open the electronic filing "envelope", let alone set a hearing. You should weigh your options accordingly.

Therefore, we should all strive to work together with your co-parents. Not because of this crisis, but "the best interests of the child". Ultimately, that is how your actions today will be judged in the following weeks or months.

Be aware, however, that participation in protests during this pandemic, can provide your co-parent with an argument that you have up to a 14-day incubation period to prove that you are now "negative" before they allow a transfer to occur.

Finally, be aware that depriving a child from contact with the other parent often results in a crime (in the majority of cases - see penal codes above). Even if you manage to avoid being found guilty of a crime, the family court usually views poorly attempts by one parent to deprive the other of custody, since it is the child whom they are supposed to care about. Let that be your focus, now, and always.

03/19/2020

I WANT TO SEND CALMING WAVES TOWARDS YOUR FAMILY; We are all home, so let me provide you with some calmness in stormy seas, by using the power of simple math to comfort your family's fears.

Only 1/275th of the people you know may die of this virus (0.0036% of population; with math shown in comments). By the data our own government and media are reporting, you are far safer than you think. Just love your family, and get through the necessary quarantine, so that we keep these numbers low ❤.

You don't have to believe me, but believe your calculator. Both the math and data are in the comments.

05/14/2019

[TEMPORARY CONTACT INFO. DURING MERGER]
1769 Hillsdale Avenue, #24713
San Jose, CA 95154
(408) 316-6005
Fax (Email scan to [email protected])

05/14/2019

Cancel all prior phone numbers;
now active business line is
408-316-6005

MARRIAGE LICENSE RULES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY; a church called recently wanting representation to fight the County forcin...
06/14/2018

MARRIAGE LICENSE RULES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY; a church called recently wanting representation to fight the County forcing them (through license renewal) to marry any LGBTQ couple who approached them. They argued "anyone can marry them, why does it have to be us?". I explained the difference between a "license" and a "right", and that the County, could attach all kind of rules on your license, even if you may feel it violates your rights (because you have no 'right' to a license), and referred them somewhere else.

After hanging up, the question popped into my head. Certainly, the freedom of religion is a critical right that is strongly protected by our Constitution. The Supreme Court recently ruled that a religious baker was not discriminating by refusing to make a wedding cake for an LGBTQ couple, but this was partly due to some specific facts. A church may have a stronger argument than a religious person, but ultimately we still have the problem of "if a license is not a right, then denial of a license for reasons that seem to follow the policy of the law (like equal protection of LGBTQ persons) is a "rational basis" (that's the constitutional law test for laws not violating 'rights'). On the other hand, the religious freedom of expression is "a right", and the legal test is "strict scrutiny" of any law seeming to violate a right.

In other words, there is no clear answer to this question. But a church fighting a County rule or regulation would be a more compelling case for the Supreme Court than some random baker's opinion on gay marriage.

CHILD CUSTODY - THE MA*****NA QUESTION; It keeps getting asked recently, if it is legal, how come the court is testing i...
06/14/2018

CHILD CUSTODY - THE MA*****NA QUESTION; It keeps getting asked recently, if it is legal, how come the court is testing it as if it is still a controlled substance? And why do most Judges still act like there is little tolerance for Ma*****na?

Really, it is not different than the law and policy on alcohol use. If you are not at your best as a parent because this is a regular part of your life, then you may not be "the better of the two" parents for the child for that reason alone. Some may argue that a stoned parent is a better parent than a drunk one, but this is missing the point; and hardly proves that a stoned parent is good parent.

We all know, as with alcohol, that there is a big difference between "use" and a pattern that equals "addiction". If you cannot prove that you can easily go without it and do testing to prove the point, that is also a sign of "having a problem". So, despite arguments that "there is no addiction with THC", the law has not drawn any distinction. The question is should it continue to be viewed with more suspicion than alcohol?

What are your thoughts on this?

In all honesty, ask yourself this question; if you were a judge would you rather have a buzzed parent, or a stoned parent? Neither, but if you had to choose?

This is why they are stricter on ma*****na than alcohol. A stoned parent may forget for minutes that they are even watching a child. A drunk parent may fall asleep, or be less emotionally balanced, yet mostly present. While the high parent may not even finish a complete thought, and their "presence" is questionable at times. There's room to disagree on these points, but I am reflecting what the court likely thinks, and that most of us would find winning more custody more difficult with a ma*****na history, possibly even than alcohol - particularly with younger children.

Because of the ability to "zone out" and inability to focus, I suspect that Ma*****na will continue to be treated with greater suspicion than alcohol into the future in the family courts.

04/04/2018

A personal cause, because even minor "Asperger's"-like Autism is a troubling disability we fight daily in our personal lives

04/04/2018

Workers' Compensation; usually the first doctor you meet, is THIS type. If it's not, then the reforms hurt the regular doctors bad enough that they feel "screwed", regardless of your side of the field, that much is true.

Address

Campbell, CA
95008

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Law Office of Evan Groff posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Law Office of Evan Groff:

Share