Intentionally Blank

09/28/2021

So Pfizer created an amazing drug that was touted to help people stop smoking. They called it CHANTIX (varenicline).

Sounds great, right? I mean people really should stop smoking, so instead of no longer making ci******es they’ll support the drug companies in making a drug to sell to the unsuspecting public so they can take that drug and stop smoking.
Wait, let me slather on sunscreen so that you don’t get burned.

In 2006 our illustrious FDA approved CHANTIX as safe to use.

But wait, then inn 2007 the FDA added warnings to the packaging that use of Chantix may cause “suicidal thoughts”. Oops, Pfizer didn’t know this would be a side effect when they supposedly did their “research” to get approval of Chantix for human consumption?

But then, in 2008, the FDA came back along and said, ah, you now how to add warnings on the label that Chantix may also cause Neuropsychiatric symptoms. Humm? Guess this was new news to Pfizer. After all, they did research in the beginning which showed Chantix was safe to use and was going to help people stop smoking.

Then 2011 comes along. And the FDA had Pfizer add warnings on the label again, this time because they came to find out that using Chantix also caused “Cardiovascular Adverse Events”. That must not have showed up in the original research which showed how safe Chantix was? Oops, so sorry. I wonder how many people were damaged in the process of finding that out?

But then in 2015 the FDA comes back around to Pfizer and tells Pfizer that now they have to put warnings on the Chantix packaging that it has adverse interactions with alcohol. But, Chantix is still safe to use for smoking cessation, right?

Well, then the darn FDA then came back around in 2016 with another warning that Chantix usage could cause “mental health side effects.” I mean, come on, how else are we going to get people to stop smoking.

Then things quieted down for a little bit. Until 2021 when the FDA finally had Pfizer “recall [CHANTIX] due to [using] cancer causing ingredients”.

I wonder how many people were seriously harmed in the use of this drug which was supposed to help them stop smoking? And everyone was told it was “SAFE”.

So now Pfizer wants you to trust their current jab. After all, they’ve done proper “scientific research” that shows it’s………wait, really? It’s supposed to be, what now?

But don’t take my word for it. Go ask your doctor. They know. After all, they get their information from…..the pharmaceutical companies. Why not, they tell the truth.

I mean just ask my mums oncologist who’ll tell her patients undergoing chemo that the v is safe and they should get it. But, if one actually reads the insert……oh, wait, they aren’t putting them in with the jab any longer? Hum…..but the original insert states that “patients undergoing Chemotherapy should not receive the vaccine.” Wonder why that is?

But trust the jab, it’s safe.

12/03/2020

Coleman's 8th Law of Medicine: "the medical establishment will always take decisions on health matters which benefit industry, government, and the medical profession, rather than the patients. And the Government will always take decisions on health matters which benefit the State rather than the individual patients. What you read, hear or see about medicine and health matters will have more to do with the requirements of the pharmaceutical industry and the Government, than the genuine needs of patients." ~ Vernon Colemen

(appearing in the Postscript in the book: "Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective is Lying"

09/24/2020

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.greenmedinfo.com%2Fblog%2Fzero-evidence-covid-fulfills-kochs-4-germ-theory-postulates-dr-andrew-kaufman-say%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR1xz6TvaP1nETKfNlZR2WCmfS7MsVcEmtXLuaLvc4o7W4GX953GKwoSUUw&h=AT35CKsEsqnj8USQICQawohKoMhx54tS8AhM92tdhh97J26BoTEDyowUmcn74ah2xpgBx5aUEd1_BxgVGZGy16_0ydtzm6oxN5ooKiNjMX9Ksz_p3TbeZdWjW2PHxQD171gZ_bsbORJ2JblxkvZ1u8JPAg&__tn__=-UK-R

In this interview, Dr. Kaufman explores a new study published in NATURE which claims to establish COVID-19 related pathogenicity in an animal model, but which does not fulfill Koch's postulates for germ theory, and may overtly misrepresent the truth.

09/24/2020

For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi).

The pe*******on of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defense mechanism – the bodies very own immune system. A strong immune system relies on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity. [1 ,2] Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.

Our immune system consists of two parts: a congenital, non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune system.
The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva, gastric juice, intestinal mucus, vibratory hair cells, commensal flora, … and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.

If they do attach, macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be encapsulated and destroyed.

The adaptive immune system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA antibodies, mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium), cellular immunity (T-cell activation), which can be generated in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms, and humoral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells). (vaccines injected venously bypass this route which is why you always require a booster)

Recent research shows that both systems are highly entangled.
It appears that most people already have a congenital or general immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected (go back and re-read that...75% did NOT become infected). So even in this high-risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus.

A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralize the coronavirus by mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells), while experiencing few or no symptoms [3].

Researchers found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in a non-infected population, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold (corona) viruses.[4]

Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus. (did you get that!?)

The antibody formation (IgM and IgG) by B-cells only occupies a relatively small part of our immune system. This may explain why, with an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there may be a group immunity anyway. The efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of whether or not we have these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.

Most people who test positive (PCR) have no complaints. Their immune system is strong enough. Strengthening natural immunity is a much more logical approach. Prevention is an important, insufficiently highlighted pillar: healthy, full-fledged nutrition, exercise in fresh air, without a mask, meditation/stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts. (hugs anyone?)

1. Lambrecht, B., Hammad, H. The immunology of the allergy epidemic and the hygiene hypothesis. Nat Immunol 18, 1076–1083 (2017). https://www.nature.com/articles/ni.3829
2. Sharvan Sehrawat, Barry T. Rouse, Does the hygiene hypothesis apply to COVID-19 susceptibility?, Microbes and Infection, 2020, ISSN 1286-4579,
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.07.002
4. https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30610-3...
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/.../9-manieren-om-corona-te.../

An analysis of immune cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 from recovered patients identifies the regions of the virus that is targeted and also reveals cross-reactivity with other common circulating coronaviruses

09/24/2020

https://www.aier.org/article/open-letter-from-medical-doctors-and-health-professionals-to-all-belgian-authorities-and-all-belgian-media/

COVID is a treatable illness. "We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties."..."If someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill or is going to become ill."..."So there is no link between the imposed lockdown and the course of the infection. Lockdown has not led to a lower mortality rate.
If we look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns we see that the lockdowns were set after the peak was already over and the number of cases decreasing. The drop was therefore not the result of the taken measures. 11
As every year, it seems that climatic conditions (weather, temperature and humidity) and growing immunity are more likely to reduce the wave of infection."....

The following letter has made an impact on public health authorities not only in Belgium but around the world. The text could pertain to any case in which states locked down their citizens rather than allow people freedom and permit medical professionals to bear the primary job of disease...

06/11/2020

https://www.facebook.com/drericberg/videos/383896579193945/