The Consumer Law Insider

The Consumer Law Insider This page is intended for informational purposes only and nothing on this page should be construed as legal advice.

If you have a legal issue and seek the assistance of a North Carolina Consumer Protection Attorney, Please visit our website. The "Consumer Law Insider" is an electronic newsletter created to inform the public of current issues affecting consumers. Sean Soboleski is an experienced NC attorney handling civil matters and general consumer law, including business disputes, Lemon Law, breach of warranty, unfair and deceptive trade practices and fraud.

If you purchased or leased a new vehicle in North Carolina, or if you live here in NC and purchased or leased a new vehi...
03/27/2024

If you purchased or leased a new vehicle in North Carolina, or if you live here in NC and purchased or leased a new vehicle in another state- and your vehicle has been in the shop for repairs at least 3 times and the dealership cannot remedy the defective condition, you might have a lemon! 🍋 Message us, call, or fill out our online form at www.consumerprotectionassociates.com and we will review your claim. Remember, for Lemon Law claims, there is never an attorney fee! Click the link on this post to submit your information.

If your vehicle qualifies as a Lemon, the Manufacturer can be forced to refund your money, and pay your lawyer!

😂😂😂
03/21/2023

😂😂😂

03/07/2023

Problems with self-driving cars were investigated when a Tesla electric vehicle traveling 55 mph braked abruptly, and resulted in an eight-car pile-in San Francisco.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/11/14/appeals-halts-student-loan-forgiveness/Why would any lawmakers or ju...
11/22/2022

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/11/14/appeals-halts-student-loan-forgiveness/

Why would any lawmakers or judges want to stop this program? Is it political? This program hurts nobody, only helps consumers and the economy. We may have to see what the Supreme Court says.

The decision out of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit comes days after a Texas court deemed Biden's debt relief plan unlawful, effectively shutting down the loan forgiveness program. Six Republican-led states had requested the court table cancellation amid its ongoing litigation.

04/19/2022

The U.S. Department of Education unveils a plan to help millions of borrowers who have been hurt and held back by its troubled income-driven repayment plans.

02/09/2022

The poverty-fighting charity points to unprecedented new wealth accrued by the ultra-rich — and asserts that the result of the world's growing inequality is "economic violence" for the impoverished.

01/14/2022

Navient has agreed to a $1.85 billion settlement with nearly 40 states in an effort to resolve allegations of predatory lending and deceptive practices.

In response to the publicity that Green v Moog has received, Moog Music has made a public statement that Ms. Green's cha...
06/22/2021

In response to the publicity that Green v Moog has received, Moog Music has made a public statement that Ms. Green's charge of discrimination with the EEOC was "investigated and dismissed". This is misleading.

FOR CLARIFICATION: Attached is a copy of the "Notice of Right to Sue" letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued in response to Ms. Green's charge of discrimination, which specifically states that the EEOC's determination to not proceed with an investigation during the pandemic "does not mean [Ms. Green's] claims have no merit. This determination does not certify that the respondent [Moog] is in compliance with the statutes. The EEOC makes no finding as to the merits of any other issues that might be construed as having been raised by this charge."

Moog's recent statement also claims that Moog "conducted an internal investigation of Ms. Green's claims." However, Ms. Green's complaint details that Moog did not complete any meaningful investigation into her claims, and in fact, CLOSED the investigation before it started, having never discussed Ms. Green's claims with her in response to her various complaints to management and HR.

Filing a "charge" with the EEOC is a pre-suit requirement for individuals asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the anti-discrimination statute). If Ms. Green's claims did NOT meet the threshold requirements of a valid claim, the EEOC would have dismissed it by checking the first box on the form below. Therefore, the EEOC found that Ms. Green's charge did "state a claim" that could be pursued in court for violations of the anti-discrimination statutes, when it issued this letter.

In summary, the EEOC did not "dismiss" Ms. Green's claims for lack of merit, and and no "investigation" occurred during the pandemic past the initial review of some documents from both sides and phone interviews with the parties. Read the document below.

Address

Asheville, NC
28802

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Consumer Law Insider posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Consumer Law Insider:

Share

Category