08/02/2023
Lawyers and/or Liars?- Part 2
…
Now that we know there are certain cases (capital) that cannot go on without a lawyer, let’s look at some other cases.
The “small” (non capital) cases do not require the presence of a lawyer as a must. They are usually heard by Magistrates. Is a lawyer defending a thief or the like, a liar?-Let’s see.
Usually, when a person approaches a lawyer, they are encouraged to be as honest as possible since whatever they tell the lawyer is confidential and protected by law. If you tell a lawyer you have not stolen, the lawyer will, based on your statement, and information in the police file, come up with a possible defense to use in Court - if you lie to the lawyer, the lawyer will be “ambushed” by the state attorney in court and your defense will crumble. So far, as I see it, the lawyer has not lied.
Where the alleged thief tells the lawyer that they have indeed taken the chicken, the lawyer is duty bound to inquire into the circumstances under which this occurred, and you’ll be surprised at the varied responses to this simple question. Others will say I was forced to do it by someone else, I was hungry, I was retaliating for something the owner did to me or my family, I don’t know, and the outright ridiculous ones like it was the devil 👿. In all these scenarios all the world will see is a chicken thief whose dominant hand should be cut off, but a lawyer is trained to look out for possible mitigating circumstances to minimize the punishment. It is for this reason that a lawyer will take on the case, but not to lie on behalf of the client. We take what is given to us and use it to come up with the best possible outcomes for our clients, within the confines of the law. Even just advising you to confess and not waste Court’s time denying the obvious could actually shed a few months or years off your sentence.
To be continued...