Nusret Karasu
In 1975 he had started his profession as an attorney through his admission to the Bar of İstanbul via establishing Karasu Law Office in Istanbul, Bakırköy. For Turkish, French, Greek and Arabic please visit our website: www.nusretkarasu.com
Av. Nusret Karasu
He was graduated from İstanbul University Law Faculty in 15/02/1974. In 1975 he had started his profession as an attorney th
rough his admission to the Bar of İstanbul via establishing Karasu Law Office in Istanbul, Bakırköy. Since 1975 he has been carried on his works and for 42 years he had worked on real estate law. Mainly he works on land registration cases, nullity of land title cases, wrongful registration cases, cases of confiscating without expropriating, expropriating cases, forestry land cases, cadastral survey cases, cases of compensation of the wrongful confiscation, administrative law, inheritance law, building law and foreigners’ law. Due to his tremendous legal struggle, Supreme Court Assembly of Civil Chambers had to issue decisionno 2009/1-288 E. and 2009/393 that dated 15.07.2009 which has become a guidance for the cases of wrongful registration and nullity of the land title. He has works and inspections on Ottoman Empire deed records, Turkish Republic’s deed records and its regulations on deed records. He gives seminar and lectures on real estate law and real estate valuation. He believes that anattorney who works on the real estate law, must have information about the current value of the property thus he or she leads the authorities to believe his argument. With 42 years of professional experience he proceeds the compensation cases forproperties of Turkish citizens who are living abroad or foreign citizens which were disposed wrongfully even though the related propertyshould be registered under his or her name or be transferred from deceased members of the family or ancestors. He works for carrying European Convention on Human Rights Protocol No.1 Art.1 related top cases into effect before Turkish Courts and putting below-mentioned cases into the practice of Turkish law.
1. Hacısalihoğlu v. Turkey
2. Turgut and Others v. Turkey
3. Nural Vural v. Turkey
4. Lazaridi v. Greece
5. Ansayv. Turkey
6. Kyrtatos v. Greece
7. Mutatismutondis, Brumarescu v. Romania
8. Sporrong v.Lönnrothv. Sweden
9. Vasilescuv. Romania
10. Ağnidis v. Turkey
11. Samatya Surp Kevork Armenian Church, School and Graveyard Foundation Board of Directors v. Turkey
12. Yedikule Surp Pırgiç Armenian Hospital Foundation v. Turkey
13. Keçecioğluand and Others v. Turkey
14. Hadzhigeorgievi v. Bulgaria
15. Buyanand and Others v. Greece
16. Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople v. Turkey
17. Apostolidi and Others v. Turkey
18. Nacaryan and Deryan v. Turkey
19. Yianopuluv. Turkey
20. Zolotas v. Greece
21. Ipseftel v. Greece
22. Phanariot Rum Boy’s Highschool Foundation v. Greece
23. Imbroz KimisisTeodoku Greek Orthodox Church Foundation v. Turkey
He has been worked and advocated above-mentioned verdicts in order to make Turkish courts and Supreme Courts to recognize them. The scope of governments responsibility includes deed registry transactions, cadastral determinations and other consequent transactions. Since the formation of deed registry is embodied into the cadastral transactions, mistakes on this transaction directly affects the formation of deed registry so that the government is responsible for the mistakes on the deed registry. In this case the governments liability is a strict one and due to the nature of this mistakes some certain people can be deprived of their deed rights. Because government promises to keep deed registry records in a good manner and if there is a mistake on deed registry government accepts to compensate the loss caused by this mistake. Making baseless or illegal deed registries or making mistakes on the quality of the real estate can also be regarded as the same within this context. The protection of the property is guaranteed by the art. 35 of Turkish Constitution and the law in accordance to related article; as well as. The protection of property is guaranteed by the Art.1 of Protocol No.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is deemed to be in accordance with Art. 90 of the Turkish Constitution and the provisions of the Constitution, as provided by Art. 35 of the Constitution and the provisions in accordance with the related article. As the elite team of Karasu Law Office, we carry on legal struggles for the people who had been suffered and still suffering from things mentioned in the ECHR, ECtHR decisions mentioned above, and we are making their life easier in the light of Turkish Constitution and its provisionsthat protects the Human Rights.
