Saqib&Anwaar law accociates

02/12/2025

2025 MLD 1955

S. 497(2)---Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S. 9(1), S.Nos. 3(c), 15-Possession of narcotic substance---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Allegations against the petitioner-accused were that 1000-grams chars was recovered from the vehicle driven by the co-accused of the present petitioner-accused---Record showed that the petitioner/accused was travelling in a vehicle which was driven by co-accused of the present petitioner/accused by getting lift from him---Contraband narcotic/charas was recovered from beneath of driving seat and no contraband narcotic had been shown recovered from direct possession of the petitioner/accused---Recovery of chars had been shown from secret cavities/beneath driving seat of vehicle/car which was driven by the co-accused of the present petitioner---Only circumstance/allegation against the petitioner was that he was travelling in the said vehicle driven by the driver/co-accused---In absence of any clear evidence on record prima-facie establishing conscious knowledge of the petitioner to the extent of concealed narcotic/chars or his nexus with the driver/co-accused, his participation in the commission of offence required further inquiry---Hence, petitioner was entitled for concession of bail.

15/11/2025

Transfer to other province ...

04/02/2025

489F PPC
Pre Arrest bail allowed

18/08/2024

06/06/2023

.👍🏼👍🏼

31/05/2023

2023 SCMR 457

Allegation against the accused was that I while armed with a pistol launched an attack on the complainant party and made straight fire from his pistol on the complainant which hit on his ear and shoulder --- However , it was stance of the accused that infact the complainant party while armed with fi****ms came at his village , attacked him and caused injury on his left arm , due to which his left arm had been amputated --- Medical evidence available on record prima facie supported the stance of the accused --- Accused also got registered a counter FIR against the complainant party --- Present crime report was lodged after an inordinate delay of two days for which not a single word had been put forward by the complainant --- Delayed registration of FIR prima facie showed deliberations and consultation on the part of the complainant --- Trial Court after recording of evidence would decide about the guilt or otherwise of the accused and as to whether section 324 , P.P.C. was applicable or not --- Accused was behind bars for the last more than five months and merely on the basis of bald allegations , the liberty of a person could not be curtailed --- Accused had made out a case for bail as his case squarely fell within the purview of section 497 ( 2 ) , Cr.P.C. entitling for further inquiry into his guilt

30/05/2023

23/08/2022

Congratulations to all newly appointed law officers...❤❤

21/08/2022

لاہور ہائی کورٹ کا کہنا ہے کہ پروبیشن قانون کے تحت سزا مستقبل میں رکاوٹ نہیں ڈالتا، اگر جرم نہ دہرایا جائے تو پروبیشن قانون کی سزا مستقبل میں رکاوٹ نہیں بنتی۔ کسی بھی عہدے کی نااہلیت کے لیے پروبیشن آرڈیننس کے تحت سزا نظر انداز ہوجاتی ہے، عدالتوں کو پہلی بار جرم کرنے والوں کو پروبیشن قانون کا فائدہ دینا چاہیے۔
فیصلے میں کہا گیا ہے کہ پروبیشن کے تحت سزا پانے والے کو نوکری سے نکالا بھی نہیں جا سکتا۔
PLJ 2022 CrC 1218

Probation of Offenders Ordinance, 1960 (XLV of 1960)--

----Ss. 11 & 11(2)--Effects of discharge and probation--The above reproduced provision of law manifests that for future, conviction as imposed against accused/appellant being solely under Ordinance, ibid, shall not deem to be a conviction for any purpose, rather it would confine limited only to proceedings wherein such order has been passed (Probation Ordinance) or any subsequent proceedings that too if taken against such convict again under provisions of Probation of Offenders Ordinance, 1960, alone--Sub-section (2) of Section 11, of Ordinance, ibid, makes position further clear requiring that where any law imposes any" disqualification or disability upon a convicted person, or authorized or required imposition of any such disqualification or disability, then such conviction of an offender (under Probation of Offenders Ordinance, 1960) shall stand disregarded for purpose of such law which imposes any disqualification or disability upon convicted persons, or authorizes or requires imposition of any such disqualification or disability.