BAIG Law Associates

BAIG Law Associates Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from BAIG Law Associates, Lawyer & Law Firm, Office No. 5, second floor, AAA Plaza, Balla Road G_10 Markaz, Islamabad.

01/02/2025
🔴Forensic Documents Examination🔴فرانزک دستاویزات کا امتحان🔵فراڈ کی وہ اقسام جن میں جعلی دستاویزات کا استعمال کیا جاتا ہے...
01/02/2025

🔴Forensic Documents Examination
🔴فرانزک دستاویزات کا امتحان
🔵فراڈ کی وہ اقسام جن میں جعلی دستاویزات کا استعمال کیا جاتا ہے اور فراڈ کی ان افسام میں فرانزک سائنس کے کن بنیادی اصولوں کو مد نظر رکھتے ہوئے تفتیش کی جاتی ہے ؟
🔵TYPES OF FRAUD THROUGH DOCUMENTS

Embezzlement, medical malpractice cases involving altered or fabricated records, and industrial espionage are examples of other types of fraud that forensic document examiners encounter.

In some of these cases, the document examiner will be looking for the originator of the questioned documents. In others, she is looking for alterations such as erasures and overwriting or material that has been added to a document at a different time. An expert may also identify sequential writing, that is, writing that has been done at one time instead
of over a period of time.

🟡 EMBEZZLEMENT

Embezzlement is the fraudulent misappropriation of funds with which someone has been entrusted. Embezzlement usually involves a person who has been given a position of trust by his employer. In some cases document examiners work with accountants to decipher the system used to pilfer funds. The document examiner may be expected to match numbers to determine the identity of the embezzler or she may simply have to identify the writing on specific documents.

🟡 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

Medical malpractice usually entails alterations or additions to medical records. Records can be doctored to reflect proper procedures on the part of medical personnel for the purpose of avoiding lawsuits or loss of their license. These alterations or additions are generally added after a lawsuit has been filed. The document examiner can determine if all the medical records were written at one
time instead of on the dates indicated in the records. She can identify the insertion of material to make the record reflect proper procedures, and may be able to determine when the records were actually created.

🟡 INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE

Industrial espionage is the theft of valuable information from a company or place of business. It may involve disgruntled employees or undercover agents sent to steal formulas, specifications, blueprints, or other proprietary secrets.

🟡 INSURANCE FRAUD

Insurance fraud is the single largest area of white collar crime. Insurance fraud is a $100 billion a year industry with most of it directed to health care which involves forged signatures, fictitious patients, inflated fees, and falsified documents.

🟡 DOCUMENTS USED IN CRIMINAL ACTS

Murder confessions, hold-up notes, and death threats are also examined by document examiners. Kidnapping notes, extortion and blackmail, and prank mail, both viciously and sexually oriented, will be encountered. Graffiti and anony­mous poison pen letters constitute some of the types of cases document examiners may be asked to solve.

🟡MURDER CONFESSIONS, HOLD-UP NOTES, AND DEATH THREATS

Document examiners are asked to identify the author of hold-up notes or other handwritten threats, to uncover a bigamist, or to determine who put the wrong dimensions on an architectural drawing. Did the suspect write the murder confession or is he being framed? These are just a few of the scenarios that are encountered in the examination of documents.

🟡GRAFFITI OR ANONYMOUS POISON PEN LETTERS

Graffiti and anonymous poison pen letters in a business environment cause a decline in morale in employees. Culprits are often surprised when they are terminated from the company for seemingly childish pranks. Occasionally a disgruntled employee will write a poison pen and/or threatening letter to a previous place of employment or a sexually explicit letter will be sent anony­ mously.

Graffiti often involves writing on media other than paper, such as walls, locker doors, or mirrors. It may be spray-painted, scratched with a sharp instrument, or written with lipstick or chalk. Whenever possible, the document examiner should arrange to study the original, although a good, clear photograph may suffice.

🟡 DISGUISE

Documents such as poison pen letters often contain disguised handwriting. Disguised writing is any conscious or deliberate attempt to alter the normal characteristics of one's handwriting habits to prevent recognition. Deciphering disguise and identifying the author of disguised writing falls under the purview of the document examiner. Disguise may also be found in falsified evidence,
forged securities, embezzlement, and kidnaping notes or extortion. Some writers
alter their signatures on documents in order to deny them at a future date.

🟡 COUNTERFEIT DOCUMENTS

Counterfeiting involves the fabrication of fraudulent documents in imitation of genuine documents. Counterfeiting involves making a copy of a legal or financial document without authority or a right to such a copy for the purpose of benefiting oneself at the expense of others. It generally involves money or securities but can include other items such as counterfeit credentials. Modern computers and color photocopiers make it possible to counterfeit many types of documents from gift certificates to counterfeit identification documents.

🟡 INTERDELINEATION OF LINES

Problems sometimes arise involving commingled writing. It may be necessary
to determine which writing was placed on the document first. Lines that intersect can be studied to ascertain the sequence of writing. This includes written material and/or typed and computer-generated documents.

🟡 INDENTED WRITING

Occasionally document examiners are confronted with cases involving indented writing. Indented writing is created when sheets of paper sitting under the original page receive the impression from the pressure of the writing instrument. While ink adheres only to the first page, indentations may affect
three or four subsequent pages of writing.
The impression of writing on a page may need to be deciphered. It may be possible to sidelight the document and photograph it, or place it on an Electro­ static Detection Apparatus (ESDA) to reveal the indentations.

🟡 INSERTIONS

Material is sometimes fraudulently added to a contract or other legal document after it has been signed. This material can drastically change the intent of the document. It is more difficult to detect additions that are skillfully added to a document than erasures. It becomes the task of the document examiner to determine if the addition or alteration was made after the document was executed.

🟡 CUT AND PASTE

Modern photocopiers enable one to cut and paste a document and copy it so that any insertions or substitutions cannot be detected from the altered document. Genuine signatures are glued to fraudulent documents and the photocopy is presented as authentic. Without an original document, it is difficult to determine if a fraudulent alteration or insertion has taken place.

🟡 ELECTRONIC ALTERATIONS

Original signatures can be scanned into computers and printed onto other documents, thereby making the printed signatures appear to be genuine original signatures to the naked eye. Documents of all kinds are scanned into computers, data is manipulated, and new documents are printed and presented as authentic. Document examiners can identify computer-generated documents.

🟡 IDENTITY THEFT

Identity theft is the fraudulent use of another person's good name and reputation. For example, the unscrupulous are stealing the reputation of victims by impersonating the victim when applying for credit. The thieves steal information about a person's family, credit history and financial status in order to use that person's identity to steal from banks, credit card companies, or merchants. Some perpetrators are giving the victim's identification when arrested for criminal activity. When these criminals are sentenced, they often destroy the victim's reputation.

🟡 OTHER TYPES OF FRAUD

Any type of document can be forged. While forgers concentrate primarily on legal documents and financial obligations, they also falsify college diplomas, letters of recommendation, and identity papers. Legal documents include wills, deed, contracts, and agreements. Financial documents that impart an obligation involve checks, credit card transactions, letters of credit, securities, gift certificates, and refunds.

🟡 OPPORTUNITY

Opportunity is the catalyst that propels individuals into white collar crime. Many individuals take advantage of an opportunity to forge a will or raise the amount on a check. Many cases that fall under the document examiners purview involve opportunists.

12/11/2024

Courtesy:
@⁨+92 334 1898989⁩
کسی بھی قانون کو پڑھنے سے پہلے ان الفاظ کو سمجھیں ، اگر ان الفاظ کی سمجھ آگئی تو آپکو کوئی بھی قانون آسانی سے سمجھ اجائے گا۔

سب سے پہلے جو تقریباً ہر قانون میں آتی ہے وہ ہے

𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐜𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐚𝐰 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞

اسکو Non obstante Clause بھی کہتے ہیں.
اسکا مطلب ہے کہ جب بھی کسی بھی قانون کے کسی بھی سکیشن کے ساتھ یہ Clause آجائے تو اس کلاز کے بعد والے الفاظ کو پہلے کیے گئے باتوں کو یا کسی اور قانون میں اس چیز پر بات ہوئی ہو تو اسکو ترجیح دی جائے گی۔۔۔

مثال کے طور پر

اگر کہیں لکھا ہے کہ
Ali will teach Math,
یا
Ali will also teach biology.
پھر لکھا ہے

𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐜𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐚𝐰 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞 , Ali will teach Law.
تو مطلب کیا ہوا ،
کہ بے شک لکھا گیا ہو کہ علی میتھ پڑھائے گا ، علی بیالوجی پڑھائے گا لیکن جو Notwithstanding anything کے بعد لکھا گیا ہو اسکو فوقیت اور ترجیحی دی جائے گی ان تمام باتوں پر جو اس علی کے بارے میں پہلے کی گئی ہوں گی۔۔۔۔۔
مطلب یہ ہوا ک چاہے علی بیالوجی پڑھتا ہے
مگر یہاں یہ بات prevail کرے گی کہ علیLAW ہی پڑھائے گا۔

اب دوسرا فقرا جو کہ تقریباً ہر قانون میں کہیں نہ کہیں ملتا ہے آپکو جوکہ یہ ہے
𝐒𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝٫ means

this law will be effective unless, in a given circumstance, some other existing law directly prescribes a different result.
یعنی یہ قانون اس وقت تک موثر رہے گا، جب تک کہ کسی مخصوص صورت حال میں، کوئی دوسرا موجودہ قانون براہ راست کوئی مختلف نتیجہ پیش نہ کرے۔
مثال کے طور پر اگر کہیں لکھا ہے کہ

Ali will teach Labour law at some institute.
پھر کہیں لکھا ہے کہ
Ali will teach Contract law at some institute
پھر کہیں اور لکھا ہے کہ
𝐒𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝, Ali will teach Constitutional law at Punjab university.

مطلب کیا ہوا کہ علی کے بارے میں پہلے جو کچھ بیان ہوا ہے وہ بھی رہے گا، اور اس کلاز (𝐒𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝) کے بعد جو بیان ہوا ہے وہ بھی رہے گا، یعنی save as otherwise provided
کے بعد والے الفاظ کو فوقیت حاصل نہیں ہوگی۔۔۔

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance ( VIII of 1961 ) --- --- S . 7 - Talaq --- Powers of Chairman Union Council --- Scope --- C...
19/10/2023

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance ( VIII of 1961 ) --- --- S . 7 - Talaq --- Powers of Chairman Union Council --- Scope --- Chairman Union Council is only conferred with the power of bringing about reconciliation between the parties and issue a certificate of effectiveness of talaq --- Powers are not extended to declare as to whether a talaq has been pronounced . validly or otherwise which is a function reserved for a court of competent jurisdiction۔

04/10/2023

کمپنی کا ورکر کو سیلری ادا نہ کرنے کی صورت میں لیگل نوٹس کا فورمٹ
LEGAL NOTICE FORMAT TO COMPANY FOR NON-PAYMENT OF SALARY AND OTHER INTEREST AND ALLOWANCES
Ref. No……………. Dated ____, __________
REGD.A.D.
SUB.: LEGAL NOTICE
To,
XYZ. Company Private Limited
Through its Managing Director
Mr. ABC
Sir/Madam,
Pursuant to the instructions from and on behalf of my client ___________________, resident of _________________ I do hereby serve you with the following Legal Notice: –
1. That my client ______ was appointed by your offer letter dated _______ and the salary of my client ______ was fixed at Rs.______ per month.
2. That the offer letter dated _____, stated the joining date as ______ which my client ______ duly followed.
3. That my client did her duty diligently, regularly and with utmost punctuality and sincerity, and with full devotion in accordance with the well-settled provisions of the law. You issued the offer letter in the name of my client and got printed the visiting cards also in the name of my client along with the Identity Card.
4. That on _________, when my client went to attend her duty; then your office abruptly refused to allow to my client to attend her duty and told that services of my client are no more required by your office and thus the services of my client have been terminated by you in a most illegal and unlawful manner without any reasonable rhyme and cause. At the time of termination of the services of my client, you did not pay the salary for the month of ___and __ days salary for the month of _________ which comes to Rs. ______/- to my said client.
5. That my client visited your office from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. from time to time and spent a huge amount of Rs. ____/- on the charges of travelling but you refused to pay and also the amount of Rs. ______- my client spent while doing fieldwork for your company. Lastly ____th Month, year you clearly refused to pay the salary amount of Rs. _____/- to my client along with travelling charges and amount spend on fieldwork.
6. That you did not provide me statutory benefits i.e. Providential Fund. etc. You also did not pay the of bonus and other service benefits which totally comes to Rs. _____/-
I, therefore, call upon you through this Notice, to make the payment of the Rs. ______/- to my client along with interest up to date, under intimation to me, within the period of 15 days, failing which my client has given clear instructions to me to file criminal as well as the civil suit and Suit for Recovery in the competent court of law and in that event you will be fully responsible for all costs, risks, responsibilities, expenses and consequences thereof. Please note well.
A copy of this Notice is kept in my office for record and further necessary action and you are also advised to keep the copy safe as you would be asked to produce in the court.

12/04/2023

🖋ایف آئی آر درج کرواتے ھوئے مندرجہ ذیل باتوں کا خاص خیال رکھیں

🖋تاریخ وقوعہ

🖋وقت ( وقت کو ہمیشہ تقریبا لکھنا چاہیئے مثلا صبح تقریبا 8 بجے یا شام تقریبا 6 بجے )

🖋الزام علیہ یا الزام علیہان کی تعداد

🖋نوٹ: اصل ملزم کے علاوہ کسی دوسرے شخص کو بلاوجہ بطور ملزم نہ لکھیں کیونکہ اکثر دیکھنے میں آیا ہے اگر FIR میں اصل ملزم کے ساتھ کسی دوسرے شخص کو بلاوجہ نامزد کیا جائے تو پھر ٹرائل میں اصل ملزم بھی اس تضاد کی وجہ سے عدالت میں سزا سے بچ جاتا ہے

🖋اگر ملزم یا ملزمان نامعلوم ہیں تو ان کا حلیہ لکھیں اور ساتھ یہ لکھیں کہ سامنے آنے پر انھیں پہنچانا جاسکتا ھے

الزام علیہ کے پاس ہتھیار

⬅اگر الزام علیہ 1 سے زیادہ ہیں تو ان تمام کے پاس ہتھیاروں کی اقسام

⬅وقوعہ کا ذکر اور وقوعہ میں ملزمان کا عملی کردار مثلا کس نے لوھے کا راڈ مارا یا کس نے پتھر مارا وغیرہ

⬅اگر مدعی نے کوئی مال اس وقوعہ میں کھویا ھے تو اس کی مالیت

⬅گواھوں کے نام ولدیت سکنہ

⬅اگر گواھوں کی تعداد زیادہ ھو تو کوشش کریں کہ جو ضروری گواہ ہیں صرف ان کا نام لکھیں کیونکہ گواھوں کی زیادہ تعداد بعد میں ٹرائل کے وقت Cross Examination کے وقت کچھ مسائل درپیش آتے ہیں اس لئے صرف ضروری گواھوں کا نام شامل کریں

وقوعہ میں جرم کی نوعیت

وجہ عناد

⬅اگر ایف آئی آر کی درخواست دینے میں کچھ دیر ھوئی ھے تو اس دیر کی وجہ
میڈیکل رپورٹ
الزام علیہ کے خلاف FIR درج کرنے کی استدعا
درخواست دہندہ کا نام ولدیت قوم سکنہ وغیرہ
درخواست دہندہ کے دستخط یا نشان انگوٹھا اور اس کے نیچے تاریخ اور کوشش کریں کہ درخواست دینے کا وقت بھی لکھ دیں تو بہتر ھوگا

شناختی کارڈ کی کاپی اور موبائل نمبر

✔ایک بات یاد رکھیں کہ ایف آئی آر مقدمہ کی بنیاد ہوتی ہے ایک مظبوط ایف آئی آر ملزمان کا سزا کرسکتی ہے اور ایک کمزور ایف آئی آر ملزمان کو باعزت بری بھی کرسکتی .

21/01/2023

فوجداری مقدمے کی کارروائی کے اقدامات
1-ایف آئی آر 154 یا براہ راست شکایت 200
2-تفتیش 156 یا انکوائری 202۔
3-بیان اور اعتراف کا ریکارڈ 161،164
(4) جسمانی یا پولیس ریمانڈ 167 ، ، ، 344…)
(5) مندرجہ ذیل طریقوں کے تحت ، 173 کے چالان جمع کرانے؛
دفعہ 169 - جب ثبوت کی کمی ہو تو ملزم کی رہائی
دفعہ 170-کیس مجسٹریٹ کو ارسال کیا جائے جب شواہد کافی ہوں تو ملزم کی عدم موجودگی میں شواہد کا 512 ریکارڈ

(6) ایف آئی آر کا خاتمہ… 561 A)
(7) ادراک 190
(8) 204،204 عمل جاری کرنا ،
(9) ناقابل ضمانت 496 غیر ضمانت 497 ..
(10) 221 سے 240 تک چارج کی فریمنگ ..
(11) تیز بری 249 اے ، 265 کے ، ، 561 اے…
پراسیکیوٹر اور ملزم کے وکیل کی سماعت کے بعد اور وجوہات ریکارڈ کیئے جائیں ..)
(12) قصور وار… .. 243 ،،،، 265 ای…
استغاثہ کے ثبوتوں کا آغاز…
(1) ملزم کا امتحان 342 ……
دفاعی ثبوتوں کا آغاز ..340
ثبوت پیش کرنا….
فیصلہ…
(2) 245 / 265H بری…
یا سزا 245 (2) ، 265 ایچ (2)
اپیل
(1) اسسٹنٹ سیشن جج یا جوڈیشل مجسٹریٹیو سیکشن 408 کے ذریعہ منظور شدہ سزا کے خلاف عدالت کے سیشن میں اپیل
(2) سیشن یا ایڈیشنل سیشن جج سیکشن 410 کے ذریعہ منظور شدہ سزا کے خلاف ہائی کورٹ میں اپیل ....

میڈیکل بورڈ کی تشکیل اور اسکی زخم کے بارے میں رائے کہ"Possibility  of  fabrication cannot be  ruled  out " کی قانونی حیث...
05/12/2022

میڈیکل بورڈ کی تشکیل اور اسکی زخم کے بارے میں رائے کہ
"Possibility of fabrication cannot be ruled out "
کی قانونی حیثیت کے بارے میں سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان کا انتہائی اھم فیصلہ

The first medical examination was protected by statutory presumption of being genuine under Article 129(e) of the Qanun-e-Shahdat Order, 1984as well as under Article 150 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Such formidable statutory protectionscannot be summarily dismantled on the whims of an accused struggling to ward offconsequences of criminal prosecution, therefore, a Magistrate must insist for tangible and sufficient grounds to plausibly justify exposure of a person already wronged to the inconvenience and embarrassment of a re-examination,

Even otherwise, observation By Medical Board that possibility of fabrication/fall cannot be ruled out is a judgment resting upon the brink of hypothetical possibilitythat by itself cannot override positive findings earlier unanimously recorded by the medical officerswho attended the injured; possibilities are infiniteand cannot dislodge proof.The opinion is also devoid of any objective finding and, thus, we do not feel inclined to receive the half-cookedhypothesis of fabrication/fall as a fresh ground in circumstances.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
(AppellateJurisdiction)

PRESENT:
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed

Criminal Petition No.540 of 2020
(Against the order dated 20.05.2020 passed by the Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench Rawalpindi in Crl. Misc.No.719-B/2020)

Muhammad Ejaz...Petitioner(s)

Versus

The State& another...Respondent(s)

For thePetitioner(s):Mr. Ghulam Farooq Awan, ASC

Mr. Muhammad Sharif Janjua, AOR

For theRespondent(s):N.R.

Date of hearing:07.07.2020.

ORDER

Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.-Accompanied by co-accused, the petitioner thrashed Sohail Ikram PWwithin the precincts of District Courts Rawalpindi, where he was present to record his statement as a witness against the assailants; he endured multiple injuries that included a nasal fracture. Petitioner’s plea for bail was withdrawn and dismissed as such on 2.4.2020. After his failure throughout, the petitioner again approached the Court for admission to bail on the ground that findings recorded by a medical boardhad furnished him a new groundfor release on bail as the injury suffered by the complainant was viewed as possibly fabricated.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a medical board comprisingfour experts unanimously opined as under:

“After having gone through examination the Board is of unanimous opinion that regarding injury No.4, possibility of fabrication/fall cannot be ruled out”

The above unanimity of opinion according to the learned counsel not only constituted a fresh ground but also squarely brought petitioner’s case within the remit of further probe.

3.Heard. Record perused.

4.Occurrence took place on 10.12.2019 and the injured was examined same day when the medical officer notedas many as four injuries on his personand categorically ruled out possibility of their fabrication; he kept the injuries under observation and referred the examinee for radiographic examinationwherefrom he was further referred for CT scanwhich confirmed fracture of nasal bone. The accused, however,moved learned Area Magistrate on 18.1.2020 for re-examination of the injured on the grounds that“medical report 2564/19 is totallyfalse and fake and is being obtained by the complainant and other person while in connivance with medical officerand if, there is any injury on the body of the abovementioned person then the same is result of self-fabrication and concocted one”. The learned Magistrate without taking the injured on boardor recording argument of ADPP, marked present during the proceedings, directed medical examinationby the Standing Medical Board. It is in this backdrop, the Board assembled on 4.3.2020 to re-examine the complainant. It evaluated the nature of injuries on the basis of opinion recorded by the Radiologist Dr. Umm-e-Kalsum whom the injured was referred for C.T. Scan by Dr. Rida Arshad CMO and it ison the basis of findings recorded by the above medical officers that the Board rendered its opinionbeing relied upon by the petitioner.

We have gone through the entire record of the case. The first medical officer has unambiguously ruled out possibility of any foul play,however,the learned Magistrate readily obliged the defence without affording opportunity of hearing to the injured; even the Law Officer is shown present as a silent spectatorto the proceedings. The application moved on behalf of the accused is not only stereotype and slipshod but also self-destructiveas well; on the one hand,it is asserted that the impugned medical report was totally false and fake with the alternate allegation of injuries being self suffered and fabricated in case these are noted during examination by the Board. There was no occasion for the learned Magistrate to hurriedly exercise ex-parte jurisdiction to the detriment of prosecution/injuredin the face of allegationsvague and non-specific.The first medical examination was protected by statutory presumption of being genuine under Article 129(e) of the Qanun-e-Shahdat Order, 1984 as well as under Article 150 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Such formidable statutory protectionscannot be summarily dismantled on the whims of an accused struggling to ward off consequences of criminal prosecution, therefore, a Magistrate must insist for tangible and sufficient grounds to plausibly justify exposure of a person already wronged to the inconvenience and embarrassment of a re-examination, a consideration conspicuously missing in the present case.While an accused is certainly entitled to “Due Process of Law”and a meaningful opportunity to contest indictment with a view to vindicate his position, the prosecution and its witnesses alsodeserve protection of law so as to prosecute the case with least inconvenience and without unnecessary hardship; equality before law without equal protection is a travesty; scales must be held strictly in balance.Performance of medical board is no less dismaleither.It miserably failed to take stockof findings recorded by Dr. Rida Arshad, CMO, reproduced as below:

“Suspicious radiolucencyis seen on nasal surface. Medico legal C.T. scan nasal bone is suggested.

No bony injury is seen in (L) orbit and face.”

She referred the examinee for C.T. scan conducted by Dr. Umm-e-Kalsum that conclusively confirmed fracture of the nasal bone; her findingisreproduced below:“

Fracture nasal bone viewed.”

The members of the medical board not only ignored the above findings, they went a step further in their inconsequential opinion to add the possibility of a fall as well, a case never agitated even by the accused. Even otherwise, observation that possibility of fabrication/fall cannot be ruled out is a judgment resting upon the brink of hypothetical possibilitythat by itself cannot override positive findings earlier unanimously recorded by the medical officerswho attended the injured; possibilities are infiniteand cannot dislodge proof.The opinion is also devoid of any objective finding and, thus, we do not feel inclined to receive the half-cookedhypothesis of fabrication/fall as a fresh ground in circumstances. Petition fails. Leave declined. Observations being issue specific will not cast their shadows upon the outcome of trial to be settled essentially upon the strength of prosecution evidencealone, expected to be concluded with all convenient dispatch.

04/12/2022

فیملی کورٹ براہ راست کاروائی اجرا دوسرے ضلع میں نہ بھجوا سکتی ھے۔ دفعہ 25A فیملی کورٹ 1964 کے مطابق اجرا کو صرف ہایئکورٹ کے ذریعہ ہی دوسرے ضلع میں بھجوایا جاسکتا ھے
ڈسٹرکٹ جج اپنے ضلع میں میں ایک فیملی کورٹ سے دوسری فیملی کورٹ اجرا منتقل کر سکتا ھے۔
جبکہ سپریم کورٹ ایک صوبہ سے دوسرے صوبہ اجرا منتقل کرنے کی مجاز ھے
2022 MLD 1280

In future, ex*****on proceedings / ex*****on petition, arising out of decree passed by learned Judge Family Court, would be transferred keeping in view the spirit of Section 25-A of the Act of 1964 as well as observations recorded hereinabove. Copy of this judgment be sent to all District & Sessions Judges in the Punjab for its further circulation amongst all Judicial O fficers.

15/11/2022

معزز جج بابر ستار صاحب کا بچہ گود لینے پہ ایک فیصلہ

R.F.A No. 620/2022
ملک محمد رفیق وغیرہ بنام عوام الناس وغیرہ

مذکورہ کیس میں اپیل کنندہ گان کی گزارش یہ تھی کہ انہوں نے عثمان کو 1986 میں گود لیا تھا یا adopt کیا تھا۔ لہذا اپیل کنندہ گان/ دونوں میاں بیوی کو عثمان کے (adoptive)والدین قرار دیا جائے. اور عثمان کو ان کا گود لیا بچہ قرار دیا جائے۔
اس حد تک دونوں میاں بیوی نے عثمان کے حقیقی ماں باپ کے ساتھ 2021 میں ایک دستاویز بھی بنا لی جس کے مطابق حقیقی ماں باپ نے اپیل کنندگان کو اپنا بچہ سونپ دیا تھا اور اس میں یہ ذکر کیا کہ یہ معاہدہ دونوں فریق کے درمیان 1986 میں زبانی کلامی ہوا تھا۔ لہذا عثمان اپیل کنندہ گان کا گود لیا ہوا بیٹا ہے۔

سول عدالت میں یہ کیس آیا تو عدالت نے کہا کہ یہ کیس زائد المیعاد ہے اور دونوں میاں بیوی قریباً 35 سال کے بعد عدالت آۓ ہیں جب کہ مذکورہ کیس دائر کرنے کے لیے 6 سال کا عرصہ مقرر ہے اس کے بعد کیس دائر نہیں کیا جاسکتا۔ لہذا کیس کو خارج کر دیا گیا۔

میاں بیوی نے ہائی کورٹ میں اپیل دائر کی اور مذکورہ اپیل معزز جج بابر ستار صاحب نے سنی اور اس پہ تفصیلی فیصلہ دیتے ہوئے اپیل کو خارج کر دیا یہ کہ کر کہ اپیل کنندہ گان کے پاس کوئی بناء دعویٰ (cause of action) نہیں تھا جس سے مذکورہ کیس کی معیاد گننی جاسکے۔

یہ بھی کہ مذکورہ کیس دونوں فریق کے درمیان ملی بھگت کا کیس ہے حقیقت میں عثمان کو اپیل کنندہ گان نے 1986 میں گود نہیں لیا تھا ۔یہ غلط بیانی ہے۔ اس حوالے سے دونوں فریق کوئی شہادت بھی پیش نہ کرسکے جس سے ثابت ہو کہ اپیل کنندہ گان نے 1986 میں عثمان کو گود لیا تھا۔
عدالت نے کہا کہ صرف دونوں فریق کے کہنے سے یہ نہیں مانا جاسکتا کہ عثمان کو 1986 میں گود لیا گیا تھا بلکہ فریقین کو اس حوالے سے شہادت بھی دینی پڑے گی۔
لہذا عدم شہادت اور زائد المیعاد ہونے کی وجہ سے مذکورہ اپیل بھی خارج کر دی گئی۔

میں اس فیصلے کو تین بار پڑھ چکا ہوں۔ لیکن یہ سمجھنے سے قاصر ہوں کہ دونوں فریق اگر کہ رہے ہیں کہ انہوں نے 1986 میں بچہ گود لیا تھا اور فریق ثانی نے اپنا بچہ فریق اول یعنی اپیل کنندہ گان کو دیا تھا اور اس بابت انہوں نے 2021 میں ایک دستاویز بھی لکھی رکھی ہے تو عدالت کو مزید شہادت کی ضرورت کیوں پڑی ؟

جب دونوں فریق ایک چیز کو مان رہے ہیں اور اقرار کر رہے ہیں تو عدالت کیوں ان سے شہادت طلب کر رہی ہے جبکہ اس سے کسی کی حق تلفی بھی نہیں ہورہی؟

اس طرح کے کیسز میں جہاں ایک فریق کسی بچے کو گود لینا چاہتا ہو اور دوسرا فریق یعنی حقیقی ماں باپ راضی ہوں تو ممکنہ بناۓ دعویٰ (cause of action ) کیا ہوسکتا ہے جو عدالت طلب کر رہی ہے ؟

نوٹ یہ سوالات سمجھنے کے لیے کیے گیے ہیں اسے اعترضات نہ گردانا جائے

01/11/2022

Retrospective /Prospective

ججمنٹس کی دوبنیادنی اقسام اور ان کی ایگزیکیوشن کے متعلق فیصلہ

2022 S C M R 1691

Judgments of the Supreme Court---Prospective/retrospective effect---Scope---Judgments of the Supreme Court operate prospectively, however, they could operate retrospectively if so declared---Consequently, there is no binding rule that all judgments issued by the Court take effect only from the date of pronouncement.

Address

Office No. 5, Second Floor, AAA Plaza, Balla Road G_10 Markaz
Islamabad
440001

Telephone

03335152023

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when BAIG Law Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share