Waqar And Waqar Law Associates

24/08/2026

False FIR can cost more than you think. ⚖️

Can a person recover compensation for being subjected to a false/malicious criminal case?

Watch till the end to see how much was recovered/awarded in the case.

⚖️ Know your rights. Know the law.


law

20/08/2026

13/08/2026

🇵🇰 Happy Independence Day | 14 August 2026

On this proud occasion of Pakistan’s Independence Day, we celebrate the vision, sacrifices and determination that gave us an independent homeland.

For us in the legal profession, independence carries a special responsibility: to uphold the Constitution of Pakistan, rule of law, justice, equality and fundamental rights. A strong and prosperous Pakistan can only flourish where the law is respected and justice is accessible to all.

At Waqar & Waqar Law Associates, Islamabad, we remain committed to providing professional legal representation and advisory services in Corporate Law, Civil Litigation, Family Law, Criminal Law, Property Law, Constitutional Law and Cyber Crime matters before the courts of Pakistan.

May Allah Almighty bless Pakistan with peace, stability, justice and prosperity.

Pakistan Zindabad! 🇵🇰

Waqar Ahmad
Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan
Waqar & Waqar Law Associates — Islamabad
🌐 waqarandwaqar.com

08/08/2026

2026 MLD 320
Fraud vitiates the most solemn proceedings and any edifice so raised on the basis of such fraudulent transaction, stands automatically dismantled and any ill-gotten gain achieved by fraudster cannot be validated under any norms of law

06/08/2026

2026 MLD 320

In the event of conflict of judgements, findings of appellate court are to be preferred and respected, unless it is shown from record that such finding are not supported by evidence.

15/06/2026

2026 CLC 328
Suit for recovery of Rs. 6,70,00,000/---Failure to produce evidence---Dismissal of suit---Principle---Appellant/plaintiff was aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit for failure to produce evidence---Validity---As per record, the case had been adjourned for recording evidence of the appellant until 18.11.2024, for more than one year after framing of issues---The appellant availed sufficient opportunities for producing and recording her evidence but remained unable to do so---The Trial Court granted ample opportunities, and even an absolute last and final opportunity was granted to her with a warning, i.e., if evidence was not produced, her right to produce evidence would be closed, and before passing the impugned order, cost was imposed in the presence of the appellant with said warning---During that span, the statement of even a single witness could not be recorded---No other option was left with the Trial Court except to invoke the penal jurisdiction of O.XVII, R.3, C.P.C.---From the bare perusal of said facts and referred provisions of law, it became crystal clear that the Trial Court had given a specific warning and imposed cost; therefore, once the final opportunity was granted along with a clear warning, the Court must enforce its order strictly and without exception---Lis of the present matter remained pending before the Trial Court for more than three years, and the other party kept facing the agony of the trial for such a long period---The appellant could not produce her evidence before the Trial Court despite availing reasonable opportunities---Lis was prolonged on one pretext or another despite clear orders of the Trial Court---Cases must be decided promptly; otherwise, it causes heavy backlogs of controversies between the parties, which amounts to abuse of the legal system and a hurdle in the fair and timely disposal of cases---In such circumstances, the case of the appellant squarely fell within the mischief of the provision of O.XVII, R.3, C.P.C., and the appellant's suit was rightly dismissed by the Trial Court after affording reasonable and justified opportunities to produce her evidence---The appeal, beingb devoid of any force and substance, was dismissed in limine

Call now to connect with business.