JSR Corporate Law Company

JSR Corporate Law Company Lawyers & Legal Consultant

15/02/2023

*No party can be allowed to lead evidence on a fact which has not been specifically pleaded nor can any evidence be looked into which is outside the scope of pleadings .*
*2023 SCMR 344*

30/01/2023

Technicalities of procedure ought to be avoided and matter should be decided on Merits.
*2023 YLR 37*

06/01/2023

The power vested in the Supreme Court to transfer a case from one High Court to another High Court is discretionary, to be exercised in the interest of justice.The term interest of justice is not a defined term under the Constitution but is a constitutional safeguard to ensure that a fair and just opportunity/fairness and equity in proceedings is given to a party to pursue remedy under the law and to protect the interests of the party to meet the ends of justice.
*PLD 2023 SC 27*

Procedure for ex*****on of a decree/order is provided in Order XXI of the C.P.C. However, in case there is any resistanc...
03/01/2023

Procedure for ex*****on of a decree/order is provided in Order XXI of the C.P.C. However, in case there is any resistance in the ex*****on process, the Court is empowered to proceed under Rule 98 to Order XXI of the C.P.C.

As per provisions reproduced above, the learned executing Court was at the most empowered to detain the judgment debtor or the person who was resisting or obstructing in the ex*****on process and that too after such fact having been proved as a result of inquiry. The executing Court in the instant case instead of holding any inquiry only relied upon the report of the bailiff and passed the impugned order which is not sustainable in any manner. The Court even did not record statement of the bailiff in order to verify the report submitted by him and passed the impugned order on the basis thereof.

It is also to be noted that the warrant of possession was executed and the resistance was not continuing. However, as per law in case of resistance the executing Court was to direct the applicant (decree holder) to be put into possession of the property and if there was still resistance or obstruction, the Court was to proceed further and that too at the instance of the applicant, but in the instant case the impugned action has been taken without appreciating the law on the subject at the instance of bailiff of the Court.

Another alarming fact proved beyond any shadow of doubt is that while issuing warrant for possession the SHO concerned was also directed to provide police aid to the bailiff so that ex*****on thereof can be executed without there being any unpleasant incident. However, while passing the impugned order the learned executing Court did not even bother to summon the SHO concerned or call for his report in order to satisfy itself about the correctness or otherwise of the report of bailiff and passed the order impugned herein, which is not sustainable in the eye of law.

It is a settled principle that a Judge has to be very cautious and should examine the report of the bailiff and scrutinize the same deeply and not cursorily before passing any order but in the instant case no steps have been taken in order to determine the correctness or otherwise of the report relied upon before passing the impugned order. The Court even did not call upon the bailiff to submit affidavit to verify the correctness of his report and passed the impugned order.

Writ Petition-Criminal Proceedings-Registration of Case.
5777-22
KOUSAR BIBI NIAZI VS THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE ETC
Mr. Justice Safdar Saleem Shahid
01-11-2022
2022 LHC 8611

The perception and discernment of the expression “further inquiry” is a question which must have some nexus with the res...
03/01/2023

The perception and discernment of the expression “further inquiry” is a question which must have some nexus with the result of the case and it also pre-supposes the tentative assessment which may create doubt with respect to the involvement of accused in the crime. The raison d'etre of setting the law into motion in criminal cases is to make an accused face the trial and not to punish an under trial prisoner or let him rot behind the bars. It is a well settled principle of the administration of justice in criminal law that every accused is innocent until his guilt is proved and this benefit of doubt can be extended to the accused even at the bail stage, if the facts of the case so warrant. The basic philosophy of criminal jurisprudence is that the prosecution has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and this principle applies at all stages including pre-trial and even at the time of deciding whether accused is entitled to bail or not which is not a static law but growing all the time, moulding itself according to the exigencies of the time. In order to ascertain whether reasonable grounds exist or not, the Court should not probe into the merits of the case, but restrict itself to the material placed before it by the prosecution to see whether some tangible evidence is available against the accused person(s). Reasonable grounds are those which may appeal to a reasonable judicial mind, as opposed to merely capricious, irrational, concocted and/or illusory grounds. However, for deciding the prayer of an accused for bail, the question whether or not there exist reasonable grounds for believing that he has committed the alleged offence cannot be decided in a vacuum.

The cause of death of the exhumed dead body was undetermined. Reasonable grounds are those which may appeal to a reasonable judicial mind, as opposed to irrational or illusory grounds. The expression “further inquiry” pre-supposes the tentative assessment which may create doubt to the involvement of accused.

Bail Before Arrest/Others
Crl.P.167-K/2022
Fahad Hussain & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh
Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
28-12-2022

28/12/2022

نادرا آرڈینینس 2000 دفعہ 30 پاکستان کا جعلی شناختی کارڈ بنانا، ایک سنگین جرم ہے۔ ضمانت خارج ہوئی۔
(2016 PCrLJ 951).
ملزم پر فیس بک ID ہیک کرکے، انٹرنیٹ پر بلا اجازت ذاتی تصاویر اپ لوڈ کرنے کا الزام تھا۔
ضمانت خارج ہوئی۔
(2016 PCrLJ 1916).
الیکٹرانک ٹرازیکشن آرڈیننس 2002 دفعہ 37&36 جعلی ڈگری اور ڈپلومہ جات کی آن لائن فروخت۔ دوران تفتیش ملزم سے ہونے والی برآمدگی اسے جرم سے Conntect کرتی تھی۔
ملزم ضمانت کا حقدار نہ ہے۔
(2016 PCrLJ 1371).
ملزم پر، مدعیہ کی فیس بک ID بنانے اور مدعیہ کی مرضی کے بغیر، اس پر مدعیہ کی تصویر اپ لوڈ کرنے کا الزام تھا۔ ضمانت خارج ہوئی۔
(PLD 2017 PESH 10)
فیس بک پر عورت کی برہنہ تصویر اپ لوڈ کرنے کی دھمکی دے کر بلیک میل کرنے کا الزام تھا ملزم اس بناء پر ضمانت کا حق دار نہ ہے کہ جرم ممنوعہ کلاز میں فال نہ کرتا ہے۔
(2019 PCrLJ 769).

28/12/2022

*In cases relating to dowry articles,the lists seldom prepared and receipts very rarely kept intact as everyone made arrangements for marriage of one’s Daughter with the hope and prayer that she would lead a happily married life.*
*2013 CLC 698*
*2022 MLD 2077*

28/12/2022

واپڈا نےمیٹر ٹیمپر کا بہانہ بنا کر میٹر اتار دیا،عدالت نے واپڈا کا عمل غیر قانونی قرار دے کے کنکشن بحال کرنے کا حکم دیا۔
2003 CLC 598

28/12/2022

دعویٰ سامان جہیز کا فیصلہ کرتے وقت دلہن کے والدین کے ذرائع آمدن کو مد نظر رکھنا ضروری ہے.
2020 YLR 282.
رواج کے مطابق والدین اپنی بیٹیوں کو اپنی حیثیت سے زائد سامان جہیز دیتے ہیں.
2019 YLR 1862.
اگر خاوند سامان جہیز لینا تسلیم کرے تو سامان جہیز کی لسٹ تیار کرنا اور سسرال کے دستخط حاصل کرنا ضروری نہ ہے.
2020 YLR 332.
سامان جہیز اور شادی پر ملنے والے تحائف دلہن کی ملکیت ہوں گے. خاوند کلیم نہیں کر سکتا.
2020 SCMR 269.
2020 YLR 2350.
دعویٰ سامان جہیز اور طلائی زیورات کے لئے 3 سال کی معیاد مقرر ہے.
2016 CLC 313.

28/12/2022

*Gift is a personal action which can be performed by the owner himself only and the agent cannot transfer property of the principal/owner through gift based on any power of attorney, even if the power of attorney contains the power to transfer the property through gift.*
*2022 CLC 1973*
*2021 SCMR 1298*

17/09/2022
17/09/2022

♦️Our Services♦️
- NTN/STRN Registration
- Annual Income Tax Filing
- Monthly Federal Sales Tax Return Filing
- Monthly Service Sales Tax Return Filing
- Partnership or AOP Registration
- Private Limited Company Registration
- Single Member Company Registration
- Limited Liability Partnership Registration (LLP)
- Trademark Registration
- Copyright Registration
- Patent & Design Registration

Feel free
Contact Us now
0304-1921034

Address

Office 2nd Floor 255, 256 Fatima Jinnah Chambers Gujranwala
Gujranwala
52250

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 21:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 21:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 21:00
Thursday 09:00 - 21:00
Friday 09:00 - 21:00
Saturday 09:00 - 21:00

Telephone

+923041921034

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when JSR Corporate Law Company posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to JSR Corporate Law Company:

Share