Saif Law chamber

Saif Law chamber Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Saif Law chamber, Lawyer & Law Firm, Dera Ismail Khan.

13/01/2021
01/05/2017

آج کل اکثر خواتین شوہر کے خلاف تنسیخ نکاح کا کیس کر کے شوہر کا فرضی ایڈریس لکھ کر یا پیآ دا عدالت سے ملی بھگت کر کے یکطرفہ ڈگری تنسیخ حاصل کر لیتی ہے ۔۔جب کے شوہر کو اس بات کا علم بھی نہیں ہوتا ۔۔سو آج ہم تنسیخ نکاح کی یکطرفہ ڈگری کی قانونی و شرعی حثیت کا جایزہ لینگے اور یہ بھی دیکھیںگے کہ اس صورت میں شوہر کے پاس کیا چارہ کار ہے ۔۔.
شریعت میں خلع کے لیے شوہر کی رضا مندی ضروری ہے .دوسری بات یے یکطرفہ ڈگری ہے .فیملی کورٹس ایکٹ 1964 کی دفہ 9 (7) کے تحت عدالت یکطرفہ ڈگری کی صورت میں شوہر کے ایڈریس پر ڈگری کی نقل بھیجے گی .تاکے اسے ڈگری کا علم ہو سکے ..مزید کوئی بھی پارٹی یکطرفہ ڈگری کی صورت میں مذکورہ قانون کی دفہ 9(6) کے تحت درخواست منسوخی ڈگری گزر سکتی ھے .جس مے عدالت یکطرفہ ڈگری منسوخ کر سکتی ہے .اس کے علاوہ بھی اگر ڈگری یکطرفہ نا بھی ہو تو بھی تنسیخ کی ڈگری ایک طلاق شمار ہوتی ھے .مذکورہ قانون کی دفہ 21(ب) کے تحت فیملی کورٹ ڈگری کی نقل فریقین کی متعلقہ یونین کونسل میں بھیجے گی .جو دونو ن فریقین کے درمیان راضی نامہ کروانے کی کوشش کرے گی .ناکامی کی صورت مین 90 دن بعد یونین کونسل تنسیخ /طلاق کا سرٹیفکیٹ جاری کرے گی .یے ضروری ہے .ہائی کورٹ ملتا ن بینچ نے اپنے ایک حالیہ فیصلہ میں طلاق سرٹیفکیٹ نا ہونے کی بنا پر خاتون کے دوسرے نکاح کو void قرار دے کر اس کے شوہر کی ضمانت خارج کر دی .اور قرار دیا کے صرف تنسیخ نکاح کی ڈگری سے نکاح ختم نہی ہوتا ..اس کے علاوہ بھی اگر سرٹیفکیٹ بھی جاری ہو جائے پھر بھی دونو ن کے درمیان کسی بھی وقت راضی نامہ ہوسکتا ہے .مگر دونو کو دوبارہ نکاح کرنا پرے گا کیو ں کے تنسیخ ڈگری کی صورت میں حلالہ کی ضرورت نہی ..حلالہ صرف شوہر کی طرف سے دی گیی طلاق کی صورت میں ہوتا ہے .is اہم قانونی نقطہ پر علی عدالتی نظیر بھی موجود ہیں ..ملھذا ہو ..
Pld 2013 lah 88 ..
Pld 2014 fsc 43 ..
تاہم مناسب یہ ہے کے اگر تنسیخ نکاح کی ڈگری یکطرفہ بھی ہو گیی ہو اور راضی نامہ ہو جائے تو فیملی کورٹ میں ایک درخواست دے کے اس کو منسوخ کروا لیا جائے ..

23/03/2017

_____=_______________=_____________
IMPORTANT CASE LAWS OF 2015
_____=_______________=_____________

PLD 2015 SC 242
PLD 2015 SC 66
PLD 2015 SC 250
Filing of private complainant is no ground to grant bail in state case even the proceeding has been stopped in state case.

2015 SCMR 1077
Sentencing policy of Narcotics is not relevant at bail stage.

2015 SCMR 735
If the quantity of Narcotics is more than one K.G but less the 10 k.G, punishment should be for a period of greater than seven years to anything less than fourteen years

2015 SCMR 56
If the accused is summoned to face trial in private complaint, court required to direct him to execute bound for his appearance.

2015 SCMR 423
No one should be convicted and sentenced to death on a capital charge merely if he plead guilty to the charge but some evidence must be recorded in support for conviction.

2015 SCMR 1142
2015 P.Cr.R 99
Rule of consistency should be fallowed in final decision of the case in conviction or acquittal.

2015 SCMR 1570
Convict/accused should be surrendered for imprisonment before filing of appeal and suspension.

PLD 2015 SC 15
Section 35 & 397 Cr.P.C conviction of several offences at one trial or different trial. How run?

PLD 2015 SC 41
Second bail application needs fresh ground if earlier was withdrawn after arguments at some length. (reliance PLD 2014 SC 241)

PLD 2015 SC 145
Principle of falsus in uno falsus omnibus is not applicable in Pakistan

PLD 2015 SC 77
Implementation of Qisas & Deyat in Murder case. (Detail judgment on section 299, 302,304,306,307,308.311 PPC)

PLD 2015 SC 50
PLD 2015 SC 145
Principle of expectancy of life in no ground to convert death sentence into life imprisonment if delay is caused in ex*****on.

PLD 2015 Lah 272(M)
Right of fair trial under Article 10-A of Constitution. Basic Ingredients.

PLD 2015 Lah 213
Exhumation without the consent of legal heirs/family is not allowed.

PLD 2015 Lah 93
Taking of cognizance is not commencement of trial, it commences when the charge framed.

PLD 2015 Lah 1
Appeal filed by the accused who had absconded after suspension of his sentence, could be decided on merits by the appellate court even in his absence.

PLD 2015 Lah 426
Conviction could be based on the testimony of single witness even in murder case.

PLD 2015 Lah 512
Section 544-A of Cr.P.C qualifying victim of r**e or so**my to entitle for compensation.

PLD 2015 Lah 84
Deletion or insertion of any offence falls within the exclusive domain of the investigation police agency and District Public Prosecutor.

PLD 2015 Lah 231
Information through SMS is validly accepted U/A 73 & 164 QSO.

2015 P.Cr.R 1249
Deyat of prevailing year is applicable when the decision is passed.

2015 P.Cr.R 721
There is no provision of law which required the sending the whole recovered narcotics for chemical analysis.

PLD 2015 Isl 85 (e)
2015 P.Cr.R 230
Prosecution is not bound to produce all witnesses. Material and nature witnesses are sufficient.

PLD 2015 Isl 85 (c)
Press clipping could be considered and looked into as corroborated material in the presence of some other direct impeachable and confidence inspiring evidence but their own strength, press clipping were not enough to prove the existence of certain fact.

( AfraSiab Mohal Advocate )
Advocate Lahore High Court
0345-4644423

07/03/2017

2017 SCMR 279

Effect of previous criminal record of accused is not relevant to disposing off bail petition,
Bail allowed.

12/02/2017

(2017.SCMR.77)

Bail before arrest.

Confirmation of
Section..498.crpc..
Sections..420.468.&471.ppc..

That if prima facie transpired that possibility of false involvement of accused with the commission of offence is available on part of the complainant if he did not attributed any direct allegation upon him...

10/02/2017

2016 P.L.R 342

Matter of pecuniary jurisdiction was always determined on the basis of value of the suit as mentioned in the plaint and not on the basis of subject matter involved

10/02/2017

Jurisdiction of High Court in Service matters: -

2010 PLC (CS) 876 and
2008 PLC (CS) 186
“where proceedings initiated against employees with mala fides or in violation of statutory provisions or of any other law. High Court can exercise jurisdiction for redressing wrong.

09/02/2017

plea of Alibi
2012 SCMR 707
S.302---Qatl-e-amd---Bail, grant of---Plea of alibi ---Accused pressed into service plea of alibi and contended that he was employee of transport company and was at place "S" and not at his house at place "J" at the

2011 SCMR 116
S. 302(b)--- Qatl-e-amd--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.203F(2B)---Ocular evidence against the accused was independent, unbiased and un-impreachable---Accused had been apprehended at the spot---Eye¬witnesses had no

2011 SCMR 45
Ss.97 / 99/ 302 / 324 / 334 / 337-F (iii) / 337-T---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 117 & 120--- Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e¬amd, Itlaf-e-udw, ghayr jaifah, Arsh for fingers---Re-appraisal of

2011 SCMR 1354

Alibi , plea of-Proof-Such plea being a distinct plea would require to be substantiated by accused by adducing cogent and concrete evidence.


2008 SCMR 1184

S. 302(b)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Appeal against acquittal---Plea of alibi taken by accused, no doubt, was not established being belated and inconsistent, but the statements of

2008 SCMR 866

Ss. 302(b)/34 & 324/34---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Contentions were that ocular evidence was contradictory, that the occurrence having taken place during the dead hours of the

2006 PLD 602 SC

Arts. 212(3) & 185(3)---Constitutional jurisdiction of Supreme Court---Scope---Whenever there is a pure question of law, it can be raised at any time, either by the party or taken up by the Court

2006 SCMR 1707

--S. 302/34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.59---Reappraisal of evidence---Plea of alibi ---Proof---Report of Finger Print Expert---Two accused were acquitted by Trial Court while other two were

2002 SCMR 1611

Pakistan Penal Code ----Ss. 302/149---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188---Review against Supreme Court judgment---All the contentions raised on behalf of the accused had been dilated upon by

2001 SCMR 25

Pakistan Penal Code ----S.302---Implicating innocent person in the cases---Effect---Growing tendency to rope as many members of the family of an accused as possible deprecated as such practice often

09/02/2017

Address

Dera Ismail Khan

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Saif Law chamber posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share