09/02/2017
plea of Alibi
2012 SCMR 707
S.302---Qatl-e-amd---Bail, grant of---Plea of alibi ---Accused pressed into service plea of alibi and contended that he was employee of transport company and was at place "S" and not at his house at place "J" at the
2011 SCMR 116
S. 302(b)--- Qatl-e-amd--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.203F(2B)---Ocular evidence against the accused was independent, unbiased and un-impreachable---Accused had been apprehended at the spot---Eye¬witnesses had no
2011 SCMR 45
Ss.97 / 99/ 302 / 324 / 334 / 337-F (iii) / 337-T---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 117 & 120--- Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e¬amd, Itlaf-e-udw, ghayr jaifah, Arsh for fingers---Re-appraisal of
2011 SCMR 1354
Alibi , plea of-Proof-Such plea being a distinct plea would require to be substantiated by accused by adducing cogent and concrete evidence.
2008 SCMR 1184
S. 302(b)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Appeal against acquittal---Plea of alibi taken by accused, no doubt, was not established being belated and inconsistent, but the statements of
2008 SCMR 866
Ss. 302(b)/34 & 324/34---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Contentions were that ocular evidence was contradictory, that the occurrence having taken place during the dead hours of the
2006 PLD 602 SC
Arts. 212(3) & 185(3)---Constitutional jurisdiction of Supreme Court---Scope---Whenever there is a pure question of law, it can be raised at any time, either by the party or taken up by the Court
2006 SCMR 1707
--S. 302/34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.59---Reappraisal of evidence---Plea of alibi ---Proof---Report of Finger Print Expert---Two accused were acquitted by Trial Court while other two were
2002 SCMR 1611
Pakistan Penal Code ----Ss. 302/149---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188---Review against Supreme Court judgment---All the contentions raised on behalf of the accused had been dilated upon by
2001 SCMR 25
Pakistan Penal Code ----S.302---Implicating innocent person in the cases---Effect---Growing tendency to rope as many members of the family of an accused as possible deprecated as such practice often