The Juris Doctrine

Directions Website

The Juris Doctrine "Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few." BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!

⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 17 ⚖️Police Officer 1 Jun Dragon (PO1 Dragon) saw Don violating a traffic rule by driving i...
11/10/2026

⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 17 ⚖️

Police Officer 1 Jun Dragon (PO1 Dragon) saw Don violating a traffic rule by driving in the opposite direction on a one-way street. When PO1 Dragon attempted to stop Don, the latter hurriedly drove away but later fell from his motorcycle.

Don stood up, he reached for his waist, which prompted PO1 Dragon to grab him while the other police officers pointed their guns at Don. The police officers restrained and frisked Don, and in the course thereof, PO1 Dragon found an unlicensed fi***rm. Don was then arrested and charged with illegal possession of fi***rm. The prosecution contended that the fi***rm is admissible in court because it was found during a search incidental to a lawful arrest.

May the fi***rm be admitted in evidence against Don? Explain.

✍️📝 Save this post for your next Legal Discovery! 📝✍️

"Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few."

BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!





⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 16 ⚖️Babes and Nitoy were charged with robbery with homicide, and destructive arson. When a...
04/10/2026

⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 16 ⚖️

Babes and Nitoy were charged with robbery with homicide, and destructive arson. When arraigned, Nitoy pleaded not guilty. The prosecution sought to discharge Nitoy to become a state witness. His intended testimony shows that he and Babes were househelpers of the Kim family. While the Kim family was on vacation, the house was left with their relative, Mr. Park. One evening, Nitoy went to the dining room and saw Babes holding a bloodstained knife, while Mr. Park was lying on the floor, bloodied and lifeless. He exclaimed to Babes, "You killed him!" Upon Babes's order, Nitoy left before the former could set the house on fire to hide the crime.

May Nitoy qualify as a state witness? Explain.

✍️📝 Save this post for your next Legal Discovery! 📝✍️

"Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few."

BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!





⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 15 ⚖️To raise capital for his real estate business, Alfie borrowed money from Deng in the t...
27/09/2026

⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 15 ⚖️

To raise capital for his real estate business, Alfie borrowed money from Deng in the total amount of PHP 6 million, for which he issued six (6) postdated checks worth PHP 1 million each as payment. Upon presentment for payment, the checks were dishonored. Alfie issued another six (6) postdated checks each for the same amounts as replacement, which unfortunately likewise bounced, and were never paid.

Deng sued Alfie before the Regional Trial Court for collection of sum of money, which was ruled in her favor in a Decision that eventually became final and executory. Subsequently, Deng filed a complaint for violation of the Anti-Bouncing Checks Law (Batas Pambansa Blg. 22) before the Municipal Trial Court (MTC), which acquitted Alfie and declared that the "facts from which civil liability may arise did not exist."

Alfie opposed all attempts by the sheriff to execute the money judgment, citing the MTC's ruling that he was not civilly liable for the six (6) postdated checks. Is Alfie correct? Explain.

✍️📝 Save this post for your next Legal Discovery! 📝✍️

"Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few."

BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!





⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 14 ⚖️1. Anit filed a case for carnapping and estafa against Momo. After the prosecution pre...
20/09/2026

⚖️ BAR QUESTION EXERCISE NO. 14 ⚖️

1. Anit filed a case for carnapping and estafa against Momo. After the prosecution presented its evidence, Momo filed a demurrer to evidence which the trial court granted, leading to the dismissal of the case. Dissatisfied with the ruling, Anit filed a Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court before the Court of Appeals (CA) without first filing a Motion for Reconsideration and without obtaining the conformity of the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG). Momo then filed a Comment/Opposition to the Petition, citing lack of authority or imprimatur from the OSG.

Subsequently, the CA issued a Resolution dismissing the Petition on the ground that Anit failed to serve a copy of the petition to Momo at her address, resulting in the court's failure to acquire jurisdiction over Momo's person under Rule 46, Section 4 of the Rules of Court.

Did the CA acquire jurisdiction over the person of Momo? Explain.

✍️📝 Save this post for your next Legal Discovery! 📝✍️

"Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few."

BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!





16/09/2026

✍️📝2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS📝✍️

⚖️REMEDIAL LAW, LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES⚖️

September 13, 2026 📅

CONGRATULATIONS BAR TAKERS FOR FINISHING THE 2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS!!! 🤝🤝🤝

PROUD OF YOU ALL! 🫶 🫶 🫶





✍️📝2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS📝✍️⚖️REMEDIAL LAW, LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES⚖️September 13, 2026 📅CONGR...
16/09/2026

✍️📝2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS📝✍️

⚖️REMEDIAL LAW, LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES⚖️

September 13, 2026 📅

CONGRATULATIONS BAR TAKERS FOR FINISHING THE 2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS!!! 🤝🤝🤝

PROUD OF YOU ALL! 🫶 🫶 🫶





15/09/2026

✍️📝2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS📝✍️

⚖️CRIMINAL LAW⚖️

September 13, 2026 📅

CONGRATULATIONS BAR TAKERS FOR FINISHING THE 2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS!!! 🤝🤝🤝

PROUD OF YOU ALL! 🫶 🫶 🫶





✍️📝2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS📝✍️⚖️CRIMINAL LAW⚖️September 13, 2026 📅CONGRATULATIONS BAR TAKERS FOR FINISHING THE 2026 BAR EXA...
15/09/2026

✍️📝2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS📝✍️

⚖️CRIMINAL LAW⚖️

September 13, 2026 📅

CONGRATULATIONS BAR TAKERS FOR FINISHING THE 2026 BAR EXAMINATIONS!!! 🤝🤝🤝

PROUD OF YOU ALL! 🫶 🫶 🫶





⚖️ DOCTRINE OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE  ⚖️**1987 Constitution, Article III, Section 2:**“The right of the people to be secure...
14/09/2026

⚖️ DOCTRINE OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE ⚖️

**1987 Constitution, Article III, Section 2:**

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.”

✍️📝 Save this post for your next Legal Discovery! 📝✍️

"Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few."

BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!





🔍📖 LEGAL MAXIM OF THE DAY 📖🔍" Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet "English Translation:No one can give what he does not have.Pronunc...
13/09/2026

🔍📖 LEGAL MAXIM OF THE DAY 📖🔍

" Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet "

English Translation:
No one can give what he does not have.

Pronunciation:
NAY-mo dat kwod non HAB-et

Meaning:
A person cannot transfer a better right or title than what he possesses.

✍️📝 Save this post for your next Legal/English word discovery! 📝✍️

"Legal knowledge belongs to all people, not just the privileged few."

BE INFORMED, LEARN YOUR RIGHTS!







Address

62126
Manila
2126

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Juris Doctrine posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category