06/09/2026
SHE PAID. SHE MOVED IN. SHE IMPROVED THE PROPERTY. BUT DID SHE BECOME THE OWNER?
This is the story of Winifreda Ursal.
In 1985, Ursal agreed to buy a 333-square-meter house and lot in Basak, Cebu City from Spouses Jesus and Cristita Moneset for ₱130,000.
She paid ₱50,000 as down payment, made several monthly installments, took possession of the property, and even introduced improvements.
Everything seemed to be going well.
But there was one important provision in their agreement:
The sellers would execute the Deed of Absolute Sale only after full payment of the purchase price.
Ursal later stopped paying because the sellers allegedly failed to deliver the title.
Then things took a painful turn.
Without her knowledge, the property was sold to another person, later transferred again, and eventually mortgaged to Rural Bank of Larena.
Ursal went to court.
She argued that because she had already paid a substantial amount, possessed the property, and made improvements, she should be recognized as the owner. She also claimed that the bank should have investigated because she was visibly occupying the property.
The case eventually reached the Supreme Court.
The Court ruled: Ursal was NOT yet the owner.
Why?
Because the agreement was a CONTRACT TO SELL, not a contract of sale.
Under a contract to sell, the seller retains ownership until the buyer fully pays the purchase price.
Full payment is a positive suspensive condition.
Until that condition is fulfilled, the seller’s obligation to transfer ownership does not arise.
Ursal had possession.
She had made partial payments.
She had improved the property.
But she had not fully paid the purchase price, nor had she properly tendered and consigned the remaining balance.
Therefore, ownership never passed to her.
But the Supreme Court also gave an important reminder to banks.
Banks cannot blindly rely on a clean certificate of title.
Because banking is impressed with public interest, banks are expected to exercise a higher degree of diligence and investigate the actual condition and possession of property offered as collateral.
Still, the bank’s lack of sufficient inquiry did not make Ursal the owner because she herself had never acquired ownership under the contract.
The sellers, however, were held liable for their fraudulent acts and damages.
In a contract to sell, ownership remains with the seller until full payment of the purchase price.
No full payment = no obligation to transfer ownership.
Possession, partial payments, and improvements alone do not make the buyer the owner when the contract expressly reserves ownership in the seller.
Ursal v. Court of Appeals
G.R. No. 142411, October 14, 2005
509 Phil. 628
Before buying property on installment, always determine whether the agreement is a contract of sale or merely a contract to sell. The distinction can determine who legally owns the property.