Monserate Donesa Magallanes Magallanes Monserate and Feliciano Law Office

Monserate Donesa Magallanes Magallanes Monserate and Feliciano Law Office Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Monserate Donesa Magallanes Magallanes Monserate and Feliciano Law Office, Lawyer & Law Firm, Iloilo City.

Have a blessed Holy Week! โœ๏ธ๐Ÿ’œPlease be informed MADMMMF Law Office will be closed for March 28-31, 2024.
25/03/2024

Have a blessed Holy Week! โœ๏ธ๐Ÿ’œ

Please be informed MADMMMF Law Office will be closed for March 28-31, 2024.

25/03/2024

SC: One-Year Appointment Ban on Losing Candidates Applies to Contracts of Service |

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitutional prohibition on the appointment to government positions within one year from the election applies to all losing candidates, regardless of the position and the place or jurisdiction of the office where they are appointed.

In a Decision penned by Associate Justice Jose Midas P. Marquez, the Supreme Court En Banc denied the petition for certiorari under Rule 64, in relation to Rule 65, of the Rules of Court filed by Raul F. Macalino (Macalino). The petition challenged the rulings of the Commission on Audit (COA) disallowing the payment of Macalinoโ€™s wages and allowances as Legal Officer II of the Municipal Government of Mexico, Pampanga.

In denying Macalinoโ€™s petition, the Court stressed that Article IX-B, Section 6 of the Constitution is clear that those who lost in the election are prohibited from being appointed to any government position within one year of such election.

Section 94(b) of the LGC likewise states that except for losing candidates in barangay elections, no candidate who lost in any election, within one year after such election, shall be appointed to any office in the government or any government-owned or controlled corporations (GOCCs) or in any of their subsidiaries.

The Court added that such prohibition is โ€œa recognition of political willโ€”it means that the people rejected the losing candidate and did not want him or her to occupy a public office. Thus, the electorateโ€™s volition will be flouted if a candidate is immediately appointed to an office in the government after losing an election bid.โ€

The Court also rejected Macalinoโ€™s arguments that (1) the prohibition does not apply to contracts of service and (2) there was no violation because he was appointed as Legal Officer II in Mexico, Pampanga, and not in San Fernando City, Pampanga, where he ran and lost as vice mayor.

The Court stressed that both the Constitution and the LGC explicitly use the phrase โ€œany office in the Government or any [GOCCs] or in any of their subsidiaries.โ€

Read more at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-one-year-appointment-ban-on-losing-candidates-applies-to-contracts-of-service/. Read G.R. No. 253199 at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/253199-raul-f-macalino-vs-commission-on-audit/.

25/03/2024

SC: LGU Legal Officers May Not Represent Local Government Officials Before the Ombudsman |

Due to conflict of interest, legal officers of local government units (LGUs) may not represent public officials of the LGUs they are serving in cases filed against such officials before the Ombudsman.

Thus ruled the Supreme Courtโ€™s Second Division in a Decision penned by Associate Justice Antonio T. Kho, Jr. as it reprimanded a provincial legal officer for unauthorized practice of law, in violation of the then Code of Professional Responsibility.

Under Section 7(b)(2) of Republic Act No. 6713, or the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, public officials and employees are prohibited from engaging in private practice of their profession unless authorized by the Constitution or law, provided that such practice will not conflict or tend to conflict with their official functions.

The Court found that there is no proof that the lawyer possessed an authority to practice law outside of his duties as provincial legal officer. Thus, his act of representing Gov. Degamo in the criminal and administrative cases against the latter constitutes unauthorized practice of law.

The lawyerโ€™s argument that he was simply performing his official duties as provincial legal officer was also rejected by the Court, stressing its ruling in the 2016 case of Fajardo v. Atty. Alvarez, that a basic conflict of interest exists when a government lawyer represents another public official before the Ombudsman.

Read more at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-lgu-legal-officers-may-not-represent-local-government-officials-before-the-ombudsman/. Read A.C. No. 13219 in full at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/13219-in-re-g-r-nos-226935-228238-and-228325-vs-atty-richard-r-enojo/.

๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜: ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ โ€“ ๐—–๐—ฆ๐—–A government employee who is call...
12/01/2022

๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜: ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ โ€“ ๐—–๐—ฆ๐—–

A government employee who is called as a witness for the prosecution in an administrative or criminal case may avail of the automatic leave of absence.

In Resolution No. 2000897, the Civil Service Commission (CSC) defines automatic leave of absence as a leave that government workers may avail of should they qualify as a government employee-witness. This may be availed by a government employee-witness regardless of his or her status and length of service.

To qualify to avail said leave, the government employee must be identified and called as a witness for the prosecution in a pending administrative or criminal case, and the government employee as an identified witness is at the risk of being harassed and/or his/her life or limb may be put in danger.

Read the full story: http://www.csc.gov.ph/new-updates/2289-government-employees-called-as-witness-may-avail-of-automatic-leave-%E2%80%93-csc.html

29/12/2021

Art. 151 of Family Code, which requires as a condition precedent that suits between family members must first be subject to earnest efforts to compromise, does not apply in petitions challenging the validity of a reconstituted duplicate certificate of title even when filed against a family member. (Ty v. Chua, G.R. No. 212598, 29 Sept 2021)

29/11/2021

"[P]arties are not required to obtain a judicial declaration of absolute nullity of a void ab initio first and subsequent marriages in order to raise it as a defense in a bigamy case. The same rule now applies to all marriages celebrated under the Civil Code and the Family Code." (Pulido v. People, G.R. No. 220149. July 27, 2021, per Hernando, J., En banc)

11/10/2021

SC Affirms Conviction of Psychologically Abusive Husband

06/09/2021

Rosanna L. Tan-Andal Vs. Mario Victor M. Andal
G.R. No. 196359. May 11, 2021

Address

Iloilo City
5000

Opening Hours

Monday 8:30am - 5pm
Tuesday 8:30am - 5pm
Wednesday 8:30am - 5pm
Thursday 8:30am - 5pm
Friday 8:30am - 5pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Monserate Donesa Magallanes Magallanes Monserate and Feliciano Law Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Monserate Donesa Magallanes Magallanes Monserate and Feliciano Law Office:

Share