L. Sanchez Law Office

L. Sanchez Law Office Law Office, Realty and Brokerage

Standard Minimum Attorney's Fees Schedule
08/05/2026

Standard Minimum Attorney's Fees Schedule

โ€œI find no basis for a charge against this man.โ€  - Pontius PilateThis Season of Lent, may we reflect on the Passion and...
02/04/2026

โ€œI find no basis for a charge against this man.โ€ - Pontius Pilate

This Season of Lent, may we reflect on the Passion and Suffering of Christ, when justice, though present in form, may be used without mercy and truth. May this inspire us not only to be just, but also to always act with compassion.

11/03/2026

The (SC) ๐˜Œ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค has upheld the validity of a Department of Justice (DOJ) circular that raised the standard of proof in preliminary investigations and inquest proceedings from probable cause to prima facie evidence with reasonable certainty of conviction.

In a Decision written by written by Associate Justice Japar B. Dimaampao, the SC ๐˜Œ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค ruled that Department Circular No. 15, series of 2024 containing the 2024 ๐˜‹๐˜–๐˜‘-๐˜•๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ด (๐˜‹๐˜–๐˜‘ ๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด), is a valid exercise of the DOJโ€™s authority over prosecutorial processes.

Under the DOJ Rulesโ€™ new standard of proof in preliminary investigations and inquest, prosecutors must ensure that the evidence to charge a person with a crime must sufficiently establish all the elements and consequently warrant a conviction.

Atty. Hazel L. Meking questioned the DOJ Rules before the SC, claiming that the DOJ encroached on the SCโ€™s constitutional authority to promulgate rules of pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts. She argued that the DOJ Rules effectively revised Rule 112, Section 3(a) of the ๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜Š๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ, which provides that the quantum of evidence in preliminary investigations is probable cause.

The SC dismissed her petition and reiterated its ruling in ๐˜ˆ.๐˜”. ๐˜•๐˜ฐ. 24-02-09-๐˜š๐˜Š, which recognized the DOJโ€™s authority to promulgate its own rules on preliminary investigations and inquest proceedings.

The SC held that the DOJ Rules govern only the conduct of preliminary investigations and inquests by prosecutors, which are executive functions. These Rules, however, do not extend to judicial proceedings as the power to promulgate rules of procedure over them remains under the authority of the Supreme Court.

The SC noted it had already recognized preliminary investigation as the exclusive domain of prosecutors when it revised the Rules of Criminal Procedure in 2005.

In 2024, through ๐˜ˆ.๐˜”. ๐˜•๐˜ฐ. 24-02-09-๐˜š๐˜Š, the SC also ordered the repeal of provisions in Rule 112 which are inconsistent with the DOJ Rules to harmonize them.

The SCโ€™s constitutional rule-making authority over judicial proceedings remains supreme, as well as its power to correct grave abuse of discretion in any prosecutorial rule or action that violates constitutional rights.

Read the full text of the press release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=161871

Read the full text of the Decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=161853

Read the Concurring Opinion of Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=161858

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIOโ€™s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution

09/03/2026

We'll be posting case digests to keep this page updated with new content and to provide helpful resources for students and enthusiasts.

[Case Digest]
Patotoy v. People โ€” March 4, 2025, GR 257910

Key Takeaway:
The chain of custody rule does not apply to fi****ms and ammunition, since they are unique and readily identifiable pieces of evidence. Their admissibility may be established through proper identification by witnesses with personal knowledge of the seizure.

Facts:
On April 9, 2018, PO3 Tan and PO1 Reputas were conducting a patrol when they chanced upon Alfonso Patotoy drinking a bottle of Red Horse (RH) beer near the railroad tracks in Tondo.

The officers approached Patotoy and informed him that he was violating Ordinance No. 5555, which prohibits the consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places. PO3 Tan seized the beer bottle and returned to the police station to mark it.

Meanwhile, PO1 Reputas conducted a frisk and instructed Patotoy to raise his shirt. During the search, the officer discovered a loaded firearm with five live bullets tucked in Patotoyโ€™s waistband.

On June 8, 2018, the Philippine National Police Fi****ms and Explosives Office issued a certification stating that Patotoy was not a registered or licensed firearm holder.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) subsequently convicted Patotoy for illegal possession of a firearm and upheld the validity of the warrantless arrest and search conducted by the police officers. Patotoy appealed to the Court of Appeals, but the appellate court affirmed the conviction.

Issues:
Whether the warrantless arrest of Patotoy was valid.
Whether the warrantless search conducted by the police officers was valid.
Whether the prosecution failed to prove an unbroken chain of custody over the seized firearm.

Ruling
1. Validity of the Warrantless Arrest

Yes, the warrantless arrest was valid.

A warrantless arrest is lawful when the person is caught in flagrante delicto, meaning:

The person performs an overt act indicating that he has just committed, is committing, or is attempting to commit a crime; and

The act is done in the presence or within the view of the arresting officer.

In this case, Patotoy was caught drinking beer in a public place, which violated Ordinance No. 5555. Since the offense was committed in the presence of the police officers, the warrantless arrest was valid.

2. Validity of the Warrantless Search and Seizure

Yes, the warrantless search and seizure were valid.

A person who is lawfully arrested may be searched without a warrant for dangerous weapons or items related to the offense. This is known as a search incidental to a lawful arrest.

The lawfulness of the arrest determines the validity of the search. Because Patotoyโ€™s arrest was valid, the search conducted by the police officers was likewise valid.

The Court distinguished the ruling in Ridon v. People, where it held that violating an ordinance punishable only by a fine cannot justify a warrantless search incidental to arrest. In such cases, there is no basis for custodial arrest.

However, Ordinance No. 5555 imposes both a fine and imprisonment as penalties. Thus, the police officers were authorized to make a custodial arrest, which in turn justified the warrantless search and seizure.

3. Applicability of the Chain of Custody Rule

No. The chain of custody rule does not apply to fi****ms.

The chain of custody rule is primarily applied in illegal drug cases to ensure the integrity and identity of confiscated substances.

The Supreme Court clarified that the rule has not been extended to other objects such as fi****ms and ammunition. If the object is unique, identifiable, and relatively resistant to alteration, strict compliance with the chain of custody rule is not required.

Nevertheless, a witness must still identify the object in court with certainty.

In this case, fi****ms and ammunition are readily identifiable objects, and the police officers were able to positively identify the seized firearm and ammunition. The Court therefore found that the integrity and evidentiary value of the evidence were preserved.

LOTS 168 sqm & 145 sqm, TOTAL LOT SIZE 313 sqm.MR. SUEDE TAN HOUSE Is Here! PHASE 2 LOT 7 & 9( 2 TITLE )LIVING AREA IS 2...
29/02/2024

LOTS 168 sqm & 145 sqm, TOTAL LOT SIZE 313 sqm.

MR. SUEDE TAN HOUSE Is Here!
PHASE 2 LOT 7 & 9
( 2 TITLE )
LIVING AREA IS 242 SQM, 2 LOT (168sqm & 145) TOTAL IS 313 SQM
@ Corona Del Mar, Pooc, Talisay City Cebu.

โญ๏ธBUYERS PROMOโญ๏ธ
Only On Pre-Selling
1. Brand New Double Door Refrigerator
2. Brand New Stove W/ Oven
3. Rangehood
4. Coffee Nooks
๐Ÿค—
MR. SUEDE TAN ๐Ÿ‘HOUSE
โ€ข5 Bedrooms Including Guest
โ€ข1 Master Bathroom W/ Closet
โ€ข2 Common Bathroom
โ€ขShow Kitchen With Quartz Counter top
โ€ขAuxiliary Kitchen
โ€ขCoffee Nook
โ€ขDining Room
โ€ขLiving Room
โ€ขRecessed Lights/LED
โ€ขOutdoor Light Fixture
โ€ขComplete Kitchen Cabinets
โ€ข2 Car Garage Or MORE
โ€ขGarden Area
โ€ขPlay Area
โ€ขBalcony

๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ˜Š
โ€ข PRE SELLING @ 17.380 MILLION
โ€ข 100K RESERVATION AND NON REFUNDABLE.
โ€ข 35% DOWN / CASH
โ€ข REMAINING BALANCE CAN BE BANK FINANCING OR CASH.

๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ‘‰ SAMPLE COMPUTATION
โ€ข 17,380,000 Million
โ€ข 6,083, 000 Million (35% Down)
โ€ข 11,297,000 Million (Balance)
โ€ข 100K Down And None Refundable
โ€ข Buyer Pays All Fees
๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ‘‰
โ€ข 11,297,000M / 20 Years (240 Months) = 47,070.83 Per Month + Bank Rates.
โ€ข 11,297, 000M / 15 Years (180 Months) = 62,761.11 Per Month + Bank Rates.
โ€ข 11,297,000M / 10 Years (120 Months) = 94, 141.68 (Per Month + Bank Rates.
โ€ข 11,297,000M / 5 Years (60 Months) = 188,283.33; Per Month + Bank Rates.

30/01/2024

FOR SALE

Titled Beach Lot
Location: Basdiot, Moalboal
Area: 2.9 Hectares/ 29,000 sqm.

Price: Php 6,000 per sqm/ Php 174,000,000.00 (Net of Taxes)

09/01/2024
29/11/2023

๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ซ ๐—–๐—ข๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง | ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐——๐—ข๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—จ๐—  ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ง๐—” ๐—˜๐—ก๐—š๐—”๐—ก๐—ข
๐‘ถ๐’˜๐’ ๐’‚ SOHO unit ๐’‡๐’๐’“ ๐’‚๐’” ๐’๐’๐’˜ ๐’‚๐’” ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ฝ 6,900+ ๐’‘๐’†๐’“ ๐’Ž๐’๐’๐’•๐’‰!
โœจ๐—•๐—จ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐— ๐—ข
๐‘ต๐’ ๐‘ด๐’๐’—๐’† ๐’Š๐’ ๐‘ญ๐’†๐’†
โœจ๐—™๐—˜๐—”๐—ง๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—”๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฆ
๐‘ป๐’๐’˜๐’†๐’“ 1 ๐‘ณ๐’๐’ƒ๐’ƒ๐’š ๐’‚๐’• ๐‘ฎ๐’“๐’๐’–๐’๐’… ๐‘ญ๐’๐’๐’๐’“
๐‘ป๐’๐’˜๐’†๐’“ 2 ๐‘ณ๐’๐’ƒ๐’ƒ๐’š ๐’‚๐’• ๐‘ฎ๐’“๐’๐’–๐’๐’… ๐‘ญ๐’๐’๐’๐’“
๐‘บ๐’‘๐’‚๐’„๐’Š๐’๐’–๐’” ๐‘ณ๐’๐’ƒ๐’ƒ๐’š ๐’‚๐’• ๐‘จ๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’Š๐’•๐’š ๐‘ญ๐’๐’๐’๐’“
๐‘ฒ๐’Š๐’…๐’…๐’Š๐’† ๐‘ท๐’๐’๐’ & ๐‘ฐ๐’๐’‡๐’Š๐’๐’Š๐’•๐’š ๐‘ท๐’๐’๐’
๐‘ฎ๐’š๐’Ž
๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’“๐’…๐’†๐’ ๐‘ซ๐’†๐’„๐’Œ
๐‘ญ๐’–๐’๐’„๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ ๐‘น๐’๐’๐’Ž
๐‘ช๐’๐’Ž๐’Ž๐’†๐’“๐’„๐’Š๐’‚๐’ ๐‘บ๐’‘๐’‚๐’„๐’†๐’”
๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐‘น๐’๐’๐’Ž
โœจ๐—ฆ๐—”๐— ๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก
๐‘ป๐’๐’•๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’•๐’“๐’‚๐’„๐’• ๐‘ท๐’“๐’Š๐’„๐’†: ๐‘ท๐’‰๐’‘ 4,381,922.00
๐‘น๐’†๐’”๐’†๐’“๐’—๐’‚๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ ๐‘ญ๐’†๐’†: ๐‘ท๐’‰๐’‘ 20,000
๐‘ฌ๐’’๐’–๐’Š๐’•๐’š: ๐‘ท๐’‰๐’‘ 6,969.87/๐’Ž๐’๐’๐’•๐’‰ ๐’‡๐’๐’“ 60 ๐’Ž๐’๐’๐’•๐’‰๐’”

20/11/2023

LOOKING FOR

1. Lot Only within Cebu City (Budget 2Million)

2. House and Lot within Metro Cebu (Budget 5Million); preferably not within any subdivision

Send us a message.

Peek into the Frontier of Progress - Mantawi Residences Own a Luxury Condo in the Address of those who wants the BEST of...
31/10/2023

Peek into the Frontier of Progress - Mantawi Residences

Own a Luxury Condo in the Address of those who wants the BEST of everything.

Send us message for more details.

31/10/2023

Family, Business, Leisure
No compromise
Have it all here at Mantawi Residences
Location: Mandaue City, Cebu
Interested DM us now

Address

2F The Cafe Project, 40 Tan Suching Bldg. Pelaez Street Brgy. Kamagayan
Cebu City
6000

Telephone

+639087703106

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when L. Sanchez Law Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to L. Sanchez Law Office:

Share