24/04/2026
Estate Tax a.k.a. Inheritance Tax in the Philippines - A Boon or Bane for the Heirs?
There are two things certain in this life: Death and Taxes, so they say. This means, not breathing would not exempt you from taxes.
When you die, your estate cannot be “officially” inherited by your heirs. You, through your heirs, have to settle it judicially or extrajudicially. But this comes with a price - costs for estate tax, transfer tax, capital gains, documentary stamps tax, publication fees, and other expenses.
If you are one of the heirs and you find yourself in this situation, be wary of these costs at different stages — the BIR level; the local government level; and at the Registry of Deeds level.
Even before beginning the estate settlement, you incur notarial fees for the document of conveyance.
The BIR imposes 6% as estate tax based on the assessed value, market value, or zonal value of the inherited property, whichever is higher. If there is a sale, donation or specific waiver included in the estate settlement, the BIR may also impose 7.5% on the value of the property for the capital gains tax (6%) or donor’s tax (6%) accompanied by documentary stamps tax (1.5%).
On top of these, the local government where the property is located will charge you transfer taxes (50% of 1%) of the market or zonal value, whichever is higher.
The Registry of Deeds would also use the assessed value, market value, or zonal value, whichever is higher - to determine the registration fees to be computed.
Apparently, it is not just the amounts and rates of the taxes that you should bear in mind. Be careful, too, with the deadlines to meet so surcharges and interests would not be imposed.
Estate tax should be paid on or before the first death anniversary of the decedent. Meaning, there is a one year lead time for estate tax.
However, it is different for local transfer tax - with only 60 days of lead time from the date of death.
Why the disparity? Why the LGU has a shorter lead time than the BIR?
We say, BIR is kinder than the LGU. So, where is this policy coming from? Apparently, from the Local Tax Code. But, what is the wisdom behind this?
Don’t they know that most of the time, prior to the death of a decedent, he or she was ill or hospitalized, thereby the family had incurred medical costs?
Don’t they know that even after 60 days from the decedent’s death, the heirs are still grieving that estate settlement is still being set aside as a troublesome obligation?
Don’t they know that after the death of decedent, the heirs are indecisive on what to do or how to go about the estate settlement?
Don’t they know that there are situations where even the heirs are not ready to receive the estate just yet?
Don’t they know that, rather than settle the estate, heirs would start quarreling over the distribution of estate and most often would result to a long court battle?
Don’t they know that regardless of how vast the estate, initial costs (in cash) for estate settlement should be expended not by the decedent but by the heirs with the expectation of reimbursement?
Conversely, not all heirs have enough funds to cover in the meanwhile the estate tax and other costs especially if same would require a large amount, and selling the property to finance the estate settlement is also difficult.
So, why the 60-day period only for transfer tax compliance?