04/09/2026
Construction contracts usually contain detailed provisions about scope, payment, variations, time and risk. Yet the process for addressing disagreement is sometimes considered only after the relationship has already deteriorated.
By that stage, positions may be entrenched, project teams may be under pressure and every delay can add further cost.
Dispute Review Boards offer a more proactive approach for suitable medium- and long-term projects. Usually established at the beginning of a contract, a board becomes familiar with the project and remains available throughout its delivery.
When concerns emerge, the board can assist informally or provide recommendations or decisions, depending on the parties’ agreement. This can help address issues while the project is still moving, rather than allowing them to accumulate until completion.
The broader lesson applies to projects of every size: dispute-resolution planning is part of sound contract and risk management.
A clear pathway can help parties understand when to raise an issue, who will consider it and how the project can continue while the matter is addressed.
The goal is not to assume that conflict is inevitable. It is to ensure that if disagreement arises, the project already has a practical route towards resolution.
Learn more → https://buildingdisputestribunal.co.nz/process-options/