25/07/2026
Call to Action | Hapū Tikanga-Led Restorative Justice vs Family Dispute Resolution
TÄnÄ tÄtou e te whÄnau, aiga šŗ
What if Aotearoa gave greater space for tikanga-led restorative processes alongside Family Court proceedings where appropriate?
This is a question I have been reflecting on deeply through my own lived experience.
I currently have an active Family Court matter concerning the care and wellbeing of our three tamariki, mokopuna. While those proceedings continue, both parents have expressed a willingness to participate in a hapÅ« tikanga-led hui to explore whether issues can be resolvedāor at least meaningfully narrowedābefore the final hearing.
For me, this is about far more than resolving a legal dispute.
It is about asking whether we can restore whanaungatanga, strengthen communication, rebuild trust where possible, and place the oranga of our tamariki ahead of ongoing parental conflict.
I recognise that restorative justice is not a substitute for the Family Court, nor should it be. The Court has an essential role in determining legal issues and protecting the rights and safety of all involved.
However, I believe there is an opportunity to ask a broader question:
Can a tikanga-led restorative process complement the Court by creating a culturally safe, trauma-informed space where respectful dialogue, shared responsibility, and child-centred decision-making can occur?
Our whÄnau, aiga have experienced the complexities of prolonged litigation involving multiple agencies and legal processes. Those experiences have strengthened my conviction that tikanga MÄori offers more than cultural symbolismāit provides practical principles for restoring relationships, protecting mana, and supporting sustainable outcomes.
If assessed as appropriate, I believe a tikanga-led restorative process should be grounded in:
šæ Manaakitanga ā caring for the dignity and wellbeing of all participants.
šæ Whanaungatanga ā strengthening relationships and shared responsibilities.
šæ Tika ā ensuring fairness and integrity throughout the process.
šæ Pono ā encouraging honesty, accountability, and transparency.
šæ Aroha ā approaching one another with compassion and respect.
Ultimately, our tamariki, mokopuna deserve more than prolonged conflict.
They deserve adults who are prepared to seek understanding before division, restoration where possible, and decisions that uphold their mana, identity, whakapapa, and long-term wellbeing.
My hope is that this conversation contributes to a wider discussion across the legal profession, restorative justice practitioners, whÄnau, hapÅ«, iwi, marae, policymakers, and our communities.
Could tikanga-led restorative justice become a stronger complement to Family Court processes in Aotearoa, where it is safe, voluntary, and appropriate?
I welcome respectful whakaaro from those working in restorative justice, tikanga MÄori, Family Court practice, child advocacy, social work, mediation and Indigenous justice.
šāļøš