Workplace Conferencing NZ

Workplace Conferencing NZ Workplace Conferencing NZ uses restorative conversations to address harmful behaviour in workplace settings.

Fiona and her colleagues have extensive experience using restorative processes for harmful sexual behaviour in a wide range of settings.

22/01/2026

Proud of our team and our work in this space. As a founding member and still working their twenty years later couldn’t ask for more

For anyone interested in the work that I do.
07/04/2024

For anyone interested in the work that I do.

The failings of mainstream Western criminal justice systems in dealing with sexual violence cases, including the potential revictimization and retraumatization, are well established. Accordingly, d...

Interesting way to respond toAccusations of r**e 📸 Look at this post on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/share/i8UKi6kL...
16/01/2024

Interesting way to respond to
Accusations of r**e

📸 Look at this post on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/share/i8UKi6kLdFG6ZcDz/?mibextid=WC7FNe

Some of you may have seen the Ridley Scott film The Last Duel and wondered how true the story is.

On December 29, 1386, before a huge crowd headed by French King Charles VI, former friends Jean de Carrouges and Jacques Le Gris met on a field for a highly publicised duel. Jean de Carrouges’ wife, Marguerite, who had accused Le Gris of ra**ng her, watched from the crowd; her husband’s defeat would be seen as proof that she had lied not only about the attack but also during the trial. Her husband’s death during the duel would not only vindicate her violator but would also ensure her ex*****on by burning at the stake for the crime of bearing false witness. But how did these two friends come to face each other in a trial by combat?

The two had met while both in the service of Count Pierre d’Alencon; Carrouges was from a noble Norman family, and Le Gris was lower-born. Carrouges was elevated to higher positions, while Le Gris, a favourite of Count Pierre, rose within his service. The friends fell out when Carrouges petitioned the King for the return of lands that had once belonged to the father of his new bride, Marguerite. The lands had been bought by Count Pierre, and Le Gris was heavily involved with the proceedings. After three years of legal struggles, Carrouges petition was denied, and he was isolated from the court. Angry and frustrated, Le Gris became the focus of his ire.

Jean de Carrouges departed on a campaign to Scotland in 1385 as part of France's Auld Alliance with Scotland, returning a year later, knighted but ill and bankrupt. A confrontation took place between the two friends, but it is not known over what or what was said. An angry Carrouges left for Paris.

According to the testimony, with her husband in Paris, Marguerite was left alone with just one maidservant. On January 18th, she opened the door to find Louvel, a servant of Le Gris. He had asked to be let in to warm himself by the fire. Louvel reportedly told her that "The squire loves you passionately; he will do anything for you, and he greatly desires to speak to you." Marguerite attempted to rebuke Louvel, only to turn around and see Le Gris, who had entered through the unlocked door. The encounter turned violent, with Louvel restraining her while Le Gris assaulted her. After the attack, she claimed he told her:
"Lady, if you tell anyone what has happened here, you will be dishonoured. If your husband hears of it, he may kill you. Say nothing, and I will keep quiet, too."

When Carrouges returned home three or four days after the attack, she waited until the two were alone before revealing what had happened and urging her husband to seek vengeance against Le Gris.

Medieval law treated r**e as a horrific crime on par with other capital offences. But conceptions of r**e varied widely, with some commentators arguing that women enjoyed being taken by force and others accusing survivors of falsely accusing men in order to trick them into marriage.

It was viewed as a property crime against the victim’s husband or guardian, and the perpetrators often avoided harsh penalties by paying a fine to the man in question. The burden of proof lay almost entirely on the victims, who had to prove they’d resisted their attacker’s advances while recounting their testimony in precise detail. Even a small mistake, such as misstating the day the attack happened, could result in the case being thrown out and the victim being punished for perjury. Women did not bring these sorts of cases to the public's attention lightly.

Initially, Carrouges brought Marguerite’s case to Count Pierre. Given the count’s strong relationship with Le Gris and combative past with Carrouges, he was quick to dismiss the claim, even arguing that Marguerite "must have dreamed it." Undeterred, Carrouges raised an appeal with the King.

French law stipulated that noblemen appealing their cause to the King could challenge the accused to a judicial duel or trial by combat. Known as the "judgement of God," these ordeals were thought to have a divinely ordained outcome, with the loser proving his guilt by the very act of defeat.

After hearing both parties, a duel was authorised.
Although there is no official account of the duel itself, several contemporary accounts from some of those present do survive.
The duel started on horseback; at the first and second charges, their lances each struck the other's shield but did not cause significant damage. On the third charge, the lances shattered, and the knights closed on one another with battle axes drawn and traded furious two-handed blows. Le Gris' axe severed the spine of Carrouges' horse. Carrouges barely leapt clear of the falling horse and thrust his own axe's pike deep into the stomach of Le Gris' steed. Le Gris was thrown off and lost his axe. He rose and drew his longsword, turning to meet Carrouges, who was already advancing on him, sword also drawn. They traded blows, and Le Gris' superior strength gave him an advantage, pushing Carrouges back before thrusting his blade through his opponent's thigh. Perhaps overconfident, Le Gris stepped back to watch his wounded enemy and was thrown to the ground when the desperate Carrouges hurled himself forward. Although Le Gris' plate armour was too thick to allow Carrouges' weapon to pe*****te, it was also so heavy that he could not get back on his feet. Stranded on the ground, Le Gris struggled as Carrouges straddled him and used his sword to smash open the lock on Le Gris' faceplate. As the crowd watched in silence, Carrouges shouted at Le Gris to confess his crime before death or face Hell. Le Gris replied so all could hear, "In the name of God, and on the peril and damnation of my soul, I am innocent of the crime." Enraged, Carrouges drew his misericorde and thrust it through Le Gris' throat, killing him instantly.

The crowd cheered as the Executioner of Paris took charge of Le Gris’ body. Having been found guilty of his crime, Le Gris’ body was stripped of its armour and clothing and dragged through the streets to the Gibbet of Montfaucon. There, it was strung up alongside the bodies of murderers and thieves to rot before eventually being flung into a common grave.

Not only did Carrouges victory save his and his wife’s lives, it brought him great wealth from the King and fame. Carrouges died roughly a decade after the duel, falling in combat at the Battle of Nicopol. Marguerite’s fate is unknown; those convinced of the falsity of her claims suggest she retired to a convent out of shame.

Picture of a miniature of Le Gris and Carrouges' duel, as depicted in a medieval illuminated manuscript in the British Library

Sources:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com

The Last Duel: A True Story of Crime, Scandal, and Trial by Combat in Medieval France, by Eric Jager, p. 170, 172, 175, 179, 184

https://uts.nipissingu.ca/muhlberger/FROISSART/RELIG3E.HTM

https://www.britannica.com

Found this article about a presentation I did - never seen the article before. Was quite chuffed
14/12/2023

Found this article about a presentation I did - never seen the article before. Was quite chuffed

A Journey of Restorative Justice in Addressing Sexual Harm: Insights from Fiona Landon’s 15-Year Endeavor In a room filled with attentive listeners, Fiona Landon, with over two decades of experience as a Restorative Justice (RJ) facilitator, took the stage. She’s not just any facilitator; she’...

📸 Look at this post on Facebook
09/12/2023

📸 Look at this post on Facebook

The toxic influence of Andrew Tate: How society has failed a generation of young men and boys Author:Author Guest editorPublished: Posted on 8th February 20239th February 2023 By Dr Sophie King-Hill, Senior Fellow, Health Services Management Centre and David Russell, Community Safety & Justice Manag...

08/07/2023

"[Quitting p**n] has helped me to see women as people, instead of objects. To see them as beautiful minds, not just as body parts."

We have been doing some work in this space now for some time. Often the response to disclosure of abuse causes significa...
27/04/2023

We have been doing some work in this space now for some time. Often the response to disclosure of abuse causes significant harm on top of the harm by the abuse itself. Having a vehicle to addres this us really empty l in our experience.

What is a harm after harm service?
Harm after harm is a service that provides a safe and supported space for conversations between those harmed and representatives from organisations and statutory agencies who have caused harm as a result of poor and insensitive responses to survivors following a crime.

This initiative is a great example of the innovation possible when we work from a survivor driven / trauma informed spac...
25/11/2022

This initiative is a great example of the innovation possible when we work from a survivor driven / trauma informed space. We have been doing this work with organisations and churches to help bring about change in the way organisations respond to harm. Most survivors don’t want someone else to experience the pain the have experienced.

SERVICE UPDATE: Secondary Harm Service

The service will offer facilitated restorative conversations between surrogates from the organisations/agencies responsible for the harm and the Person Harmed.

The Purpose is to address and tackle secondary harm - additional trauma experienced by the victims/survivors of sexual harm caused not as a direct result of an offence, but via the responses to it (e.g. court, police, social works, NHS, third sector, etc.).

With the aim to create awareness about secondary harm, encourage understanding, acceptance, accountability and responsibility from the organisations responsible for the harm, tackle the low report ratings and fear of re-victimisation during the Criminal Justice Process, rebuild trust in the criminal justice system and its organisations and promote change towards the prevention of Secondary Harm.

We are doing this work here in NZ with good outcomes reported
17/11/2022

We are doing this work here in NZ with good outcomes reported

The Government is examining options for an inquiry into schools run by the Spiritan order, with almost 80 members of the order now the subject of abuse allegations.

It’s important to remember taking something that seems minor can be an issue as you just don’t know what someone has bee...
31/10/2022

It’s important to remember taking something that seems minor can be an issue as you just don’t know what someone has been through in the past. That’s why is so important to have specialist services drink with sexual harassment in the workplace.

"It was that real sense of suffering [in] silence."

Great podcast on the justice system coming up
06/07/2022

Great podcast on the justice system coming up

This 5-part podcast hosted by Tommy Doran and Ana Chaya-Scotney will highlight the alternative solutions that already exist, and explore what a decolonised, rehabilitative justice system can look like, if we choose it.

Address

Auckland

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Workplace Conferencing NZ posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Workplace Conferencing NZ:

Share

Category