Norling Law

Norling Law We resolve commercial disputes and get business owners paid promptly!

Insolvency appointments are running at their highest year-to-date level since 2011, and construction alone has shed over...
09/09/2026

Insolvency appointments are running at their highest year-to-date level since 2011, and construction alone has shed over 500 companies in the past year. For law firms without a dedicated insolvency or restructuring practice, that volume is starting to show up as referral pressure: clients with matters that need specialist handling, arriving faster than usual.

We work with a number of firms on exactly this basis, taking on insolvency, restructuring, and director-risk matters as a referral partner rather than a competitor for the firm's broader relationship. That includes shareholder disputes that surface out of a distressed business, tax debt negotiations that sit outside a general practice's usual scope, and formal insolvency processes that need a team who does this work daily.

For firms managing an increasing number of these referrals, having a specialist partner who can pick up a matter cleanly, and hand it back cleanly, matters more this year than it has in some time.

If your practice is fielding more insolvency-adjacent matters than usual, we're glad to talk about how a referral relationship might work.

Get in touch: norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

Last June, personal finance research site MoneyHub published a comprehensive guide to IRD tax debt for New Zealand busin...
07/09/2026

Last June, personal finance research site MoneyHub published a comprehensive guide to IRD tax debt for New Zealand business owners, developed in partnership with our tax debt negotiation team.

The guide walks through how a missed GST or PAYE payment compounds through penalties and use-of-money interest, why GST and PAYE are treated as trust money with personal liability implications for directors, and what options exist before IRD's enforcement powers come into play.

It's the kind of detail we work through with clients directly, now available as a standalone resource for any business owner wanting to understand their position before picking up the phone.

Read the guide: https://www.moneyhub.co.nz/tax-debt.html

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

New Zealand's construction sector lost 551 companies over the past year, and the fourth quarter of 2025 recorded the hig...
04/09/2026

New Zealand's construction sector lost 551 companies over the past year, and the fourth quarter of 2025 recorded the highest quarterly failure rate since sector tracking began in 2022. Construction now accounts for roughly 30% of all liquidation appointments nationally, a disproportionate share for an industry that makes up a much smaller slice of the economy.

Consolidation of this scale rarely happens cleanly. When a construction business closes, unwinds, or restructures, the people left holding unresolved positions are often co-owners: shareholders who built the business together and now disagree about what happens next. Should the remaining assets be split, sold, or wound down. Does one shareholder buy the other out. Who carries what's left of the liability.

These situations are rarely about who's right. They're about which options are still realistically open, given the state of the business, the relationship between the parties, and how much time is left before a decision gets made for them by creditors or the market.

We work with shareholders navigating exactly this: not adjudicating blame, but mapping the practical options that remain (buyout, wind-down, restructuring, or a negotiated exit) and helping clients choose the one that protects their position.

If your business is part of a shareholder relationship under this kind of pressure, it's worth understanding your options before others decide for you.

Talk to us:
norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

5 Signs Your Business Has an IRD Problem1. GST or PAYE payments are being delayed to cover other costs.2. You've stopped...
02/09/2026

5 Signs Your Business Has an IRD Problem

1. GST or PAYE payments are being delayed to cover other costs.
2. You've stopped opening or responding to IRD correspondence.
3. Use-of-money interest and penalties are growing faster than you're paying them down.
4. You're relying on next month's revenue to cover last month's tax.
5. You haven't discussed a repayment arrangement with IRD, or your accountant, in the last quarter.

Any one of these on its own isn't unusual. Together, they tend to describe a business heading toward a harder conversation that needs to be had.
GST and PAYE are collected on behalf of the Crown, which changes the risk profile for directors specifically, not just the business.

If this sounds familiar, we're happy to talk through the options.

Book a consultation: norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

Budget 2026 added a further $15 million a year to IRD's debt-compliance activity, on top of increases in Budget 2024 and...
31/08/2026

Budget 2026 added a further $15 million a year to IRD's debt-compliance activity, on top of increases in Budget 2024 and Budget 2025. That's the third consecutive year of investment in the same direction, not a one-off enforcement push.

The effect is already visible in the numbers. IRD referred 650 cases to the Court for liquidation orders this year, a 49% increase on the year before. Only 13.1% of the country's overdue tax debt sits under an active repayment arrangement, despite IRD setting up over 200,000 instalment arrangements.

Most businesses carrying tax debt are not engaging with it proactively, and the funding increase suggests IRD's patience for that is shortening.

The practical takeaway for a business owner watching from the outside has less to do with IRD becoming more aggressive for its own sake, and more to do with the gap between manageable arrears and formal enforcement closing faster than in previous years. A repayment conversation that would once have been routine now needs to happen sooner to land the same way.

If your business is carrying IRD debt and hasn't reviewed its position against this year's enforcement settings, that's worth doing before IRD does it for you.

Talk to us
https://norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

Only 13.1% of New Zealand's overdue tax debt currently sits under an active repayment arrangement. The rest is either un...
30/08/2026

Only 13.1% of New Zealand's overdue tax debt currently sits under an active repayment arrangement. The rest is either unmanaged or being handled informally, which tends to be the more expensive path once penalties and use-of-money interest compound.

A formal arrangement with IRD isn't the only option, and it isn't always the right one. Depending on the position, a business might be better served by a structured compromise, a short-term restructuring, or, in some cases, an orderly wind-down that protects the director personally.

The right option depends on the numbers, not on which one feels least uncomfortable.

We help business owners work out which path actually fits their position.
Book a consultation: norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

When your business collects GST from customers or deducts PAYE from wages, that money is held on behalf of the Crown, no...
29/08/2026

When your business collects GST from customers or deducts PAYE from wages, that money is held on behalf of the Crown, not the business.

Continuing to trade while unable to pay those amounts is different, legally, as compared to falling behind on a supplier invoice. It can expose directors to personal liability under the Companies Act 1993, separate from whatever happens to the company itself.

This is often the point business owners misunderstand: the tax debt itself is usually the smaller problem. The bigger one is the decision, often made under pressure, to keep trading with money that was never the company's to spend.
If you're unsure where your business sits against this, we can help you look at it clearly.

Book a consultation: norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

Three weeks ago, we flagged that company liquidations had reached a 16-year high, the sharpest increase since 2010. The ...
28/08/2026

Three weeks ago, we flagged that company liquidations had reached a 16-year high, the sharpest increase since 2010. The month since hasn't changed that picture; it's confirmed it.

The latest monthly data from insolvency practitioners shows year-to-date appointments at their highest level for the first seven months of any year since 2011. July alone recorded 299 formal insolvency appointments, ahead of both July 2025 and July 2024.

The composition matters as much as the volume here. More than four-fifths of July's appointments were for liquidation, not administrations or receiverships aimed at rescue. That split tends to reflect businesses reaching a decision point later than they needed to, once restructuring options have already narrowed.

Brent has spoken previously about fielding upwards of 160 consultations a month from business owners in exactly this position. The common thread is rarely bad luck. Usually, it comes down to timing.

Improving macro conditions, easing inflation, rising job ads, don't change this quickly. Insolvency data moves on a lag, and a business that used up its reserves surviving the past two years don’t get them back just because confidence indicators are turning.

If your business is watching this from a position of uncertainty, the conversation is more useful now than it will be once the numbers move again.

Book a consultation: norlinglaw.co.nz/book-a-consultation/

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

The fifth in our series of patterns we see from business owners who call us needing insolvency advice: directors sign pe...
17/08/2026

The fifth in our series of patterns we see from business owners who call us needing insolvency advice: directors sign personal guarantees without full understanding. The company fails. They then discover the limits of “limited liability.”

In theory, incorporating a company gives you limited liability. In practice, many directors do not operate on that basis.

Landlords want a PG. Banks want a PG. Equipment finance wants a PG. Trade suppliers above a credit limit want a PG. Each one, signed alone, feels manageable. Years later, when the company fails, all those guarantees crystallise at once.

Worse yet, directors sign terms that include guarantees without reading and understanding the full extent of their exposure. We have sat with directors who genuinely thought they had limited liability, who couldn’t give us a list of PGs signed. The total personal exposure was often a multiple of their net wealth.

The maths can be brutal. A five-year commercial lease PG can be hundreds of thousands. A bank PG is often unlimited. And the family home is usually in the firing line, sometimes with proper spousal consent, sometimes without.

TIP: Get advice on spousal consent to personal guarantees.

We understand it. Refusing to sign a PG can cost you the deal. Landlords won’t lease, banks won’t lend, suppliers won’t extend credit. In the early years, signing them can often be the only way to operate.

Another issue: PGs are signed, then the director resigns (or is removed), and the company continues to trade for years, but the guarantee remains. The demand that follows can come as quite a surprise.

So what should you actually be doing?

Read what you are signing. The amount, the duration, the trigger, and what assets are exposed. Negotiate caps and sunsets; many PGs can be capped at a dollar amount, limited to a term, or released when the company hits a financial threshold. Many directors never ask.

Keep a register. Every PG you sign, with counterparty, amount, and trigger. If you resign as director, seek to deal with PGs and remove or renegotiate them before you lose control of the company.

The directors we never see in distress aren’t the ones who refused to sign. They are the ones who signed knowing exactly what they were on the hook for, and managed the exposure deliberately.

Norling Law is a specialist Litigation and Dispute Resolution Law firm with a core focus on Insolvency and Restructuring.

The fourth in our series of patterns we see from business owners who call us needing advice in distress: two co-founders...
14/08/2026

The fourth in our series of patterns we see from business owners who call us needing advice in distress: two co-founders started a business together — often mates or family. They didn’t paper things properly. Years later, when things got hard, or one wanted out, or wanted to be paid more, or to grow in a different direction, the relationship couldn’t survive the absence of structure.

By the time a dispute resolution lawyer gets involved, the business is being consumed by a shareholder dispute that eats the value out of it.

When two or more people start a business together, the dynamic at the start is almost always positive. Shared optimism, shared workload, shared upside. Nobody is thinking about deadlock, one is wanting out, or one stops contributing. Nobody is thinking about death, divorce, illness, or a fundamental disagreement about direction.
That’s understandable. Papering relationships properly at the start can feel premature. Like preparing for a divorce on the wedding day.

But the time to write the shareholder agreement is when you still like each other.

Here is what we see again and again. In the growth stage, things just work. That doesn’t always survive post-growth. One wants to grow aggressively, the other to keep it lean. One starts working less because life happens. One brings in their spouse and the other isn’t comfortable. One wants to sell their share. One dies, and now you’re in business with their estate.

Without a shareholder agreement, the Companies Act 1993 governs what happens next. It is fine as a backstop, but a poor substitute for what could have been agreed five years earlier.

The disputes we deal with often hinge on questions a shareholder agreement would have answered. How do we value shares on exit? Who gets dragged along if the other wants to sell? What happens if we cannot agree? How do we remove or remunerate a shareholder who becomes non-contributing?

Without an agreement, these get answered in mediation if you are fortunate, or in the High Court if you are not.

We get it. Paying a lawyer to draft an agreement about scenarios you cannot imagine feels like overhead. But it is the cheapest insurance you will ever buy.

So what should you be doing? If you started a business with a co-founder, get a shareholder agreement. Not next year. Now, while you still get along. If you signed one five or more years ago, read it again. Agreements that fit at start-up often do not fit at scale.

Build in clear mechanics for the things that destroy relationships under pressure: valuation on exit, pre-emptive rights, tag and drag, deadlock resolution, death, divorce, incapacity, and what constitutes a fundamental breach.

Have the awkward conversation early.

We don’t draft shareholder agreements. We resolve disputes. If you want to avoid talking to a lawyer like us, talk to one who will put this document in place.

Next in the series: personal guarantees, and what directors are actually on the hook for.

Address

Level 1/55 Corinthian Drive
Albany
0632

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5:30pm
Tuesday 9am - 5:30pm
Wednesday 9am - 5:30pm
Thursday 9am - 5:30pm
Friday 9am - 5:30pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Norling Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share