Your Backyard Lawyer

Your Backyard Lawyer Legal Talks, Consultation, Advice, Corporate and Property Management and General Matters

12/05/2026
May I seize this medium to appreciate our friends and followers who have stayed put despite the lengthy period of drough...
08/03/2026

May I seize this medium to appreciate our friends and followers who have stayed put despite the lengthy period of drought contentwise.

Henceforth, we shall take deliberate steps to bring you useful legal tips and contents to enrich and guide you in your daily, business and social life.

Thank you for the show of love and support.

We're Your Backyard Lawyer and always at your service.

17/01/2026

Since yesterday, the social media has been replete and awash with several posts on the propriety or otherwise of the Order of the Rivers State High Court made by Hon. Justice Fiberisima.

Surprisingly, most of the opinions were offered by commentators who are neither lawyers nor learned.

Many proponents are of the opinion that a Court of law cannot restrain the legislature from carrying out their constitutional responsibility, and to that extent, they argue vigorously that the said Order is a nullity.

However, I think it's important to state that ordinarily, a Court of law will not and ought not interfere with the activities of the legislature, but it's noteworthy that the jurisdiction of the Court is not ousted from so doing, hence in appropriate circumstances, when it's established that the proper course or procedure has not been adhered to in carrying out legislative duties, the Court of law would make the necessary Order by restraining the legislature from taking further action/step, and in extreme cases, the Court will make an Order expunging, annulling or setting aside whatever the law makers must have done.

Assuming without conceding that the Courts have no jurisdiction to restrain the legislature from taking certain actions, it's important to critically look at the Order under discourse; the Order is not directed to the Rivers State House of Assembly. Rather, it is directed to the Chief Judge of the State, restraining him from doing certain things. Consequently, it's submitted that the learned Judge acted wisely and properly handed down the Order since she did not restrain the lawmakers from doing anything.

Further to the above, the RSHA should proceed with the impeachment proceeding if they think it's practicable without the Chief Judge doing what's needed of him in impeachment proceedings.

Let me add that, even if the Order of Court is directed to the lawmakers, and they strongly feel that it's a nullity, they still have no choice than to obey the Order until it's set aside on appeal or by a superior Court.

Your Backyard Lawyer.

17/01/2026

For the record, Fiberisima, J. did not restrain the RSHA. My Lord only restrained his learned brother, the CJ. So, let Wike boys go ahead with their impeachment😂😂

01/01/2026

Happy New Year to everyone of you.
Thank you for 2025.
Let's do it in a better way in 2026.
God bless you all❤️

Address

128 Abuloma Road
Port Harcourt

Telephone

+2348106629229

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Your Backyard Lawyer posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Your Backyard Lawyer:

Shortcuts

Share

Category